06-05-2019 Regional Planning Regular Meeting Packet
Hall County Regional
Planning Commission
Wednesday, June 5, 2019
Regular Meeting Packet
Commission Members:
Judd Allan Hall County
Tony Randone Grand Island
Derek Apfel Grand Island
Hector Rubio Grand Island
Leonard Rainforth Hall County
Carla Maurer Doniphan
Dean Kjar Wood River
Robin Hendricksen Grand Island
Jaye Monter Cairo Vice Chairperson
Pat O’Neill Hall County Chairperson
Greg Robb Hall County
Leslie Ruge Alda Secretary
Regional Planning Director: Chad Nabity
Planning Technician:
Rashad Moxey
Administrative Assistant:
Norma Hernandez
6:00 PM
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 1 / 136
Call to Order
Roll Call
A - SUBMITTAL OF REQUESTS FOR FUTURE ITEMS
Individuals who have appropriate items for City Council consideration should complete the Request for
Future Agenda Items form located at the Information Booth. If the issue can be handled administratively
without Council action, notification will be provided. If the item is scheduled for a meeting or study
session, notification of the date will be given.
B - RESERVE TIME TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS
This is an opportunity for individuals wishing to provide input on any of tonight's agenda items to reserve
time to speak. Please come forward, state your name and address, and the Agenda topic on which you will
be speaking.
DIRECTOR COMMUNICATION
This is an opportunity for the Director to comment on current events, activities, and issues of interest to
the commission.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 2 / 136
Hall County Regional Planning
Commission
Wednesday, June 5, 2019
Regular Meeting
Item A1
Agenda
Staff Contact:
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 3 / 136
AGENDA AND NOTICE OF MEETING
Wednesday, June 5, 2019
6:00 p.m.
City Hall Council Chambers — Grand Island
1.Call to Order - This is a public meeting subject to the open meetings laws of the
State of Nebraska. The requirements for an open meeting are posted on the wall in
this room and anyone who would like to find out what those are is welcome to read
through them.
The Planning Commission may vote to go into Closed Session on any Agenda Item
as allowed by State Law.
The Commission will discuss and may take action on any item listed on this agenda.
The order of items on the agenda may be reorganized by the Chair to facilitate the
flow of the meeting to better accommodate the public.
2.Minutes of the May 1, 2019.
3.Request Time to Speak.
4.Public Hearing- Hall County One & Six year Road Plan - concerning adoption of the 1
& 6 year street improvement plan, for Hall County, Nebraska for 2020-2025 (C-27-
2019HC).
5.Public Hearing – Substandard and Blight Study: Concerning a study to determine if the
proposed CRA Area #16 qualifies as substandard and blighted and to forward a
recommendation on the study to the Grand Island City Council. Proposed CRA Area #16
is approximately 569.09 acres of property in northern Grand Island north of State Street
and east of Webb Road including the all of the Central Nebraska Veterans Home property
(C-24-2019GI).
6.Public Hearing – Substandard and Blight Study: Concerning a study to determine if the
proposed CRA Area #29 qualifies as substandard and blighted and to forward a
recommendation on the study to the Grand Island City Council. Proposed CRA Area #29
is approximately 33.18 acres of property in southern Grand Island south of Wildwood Drive
and east of U.S. Highway 281 including the former Lewis Greenscape property (C-25-
2019GI).
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 4 / 136
7.Public Hearing – Text Amendment-Grand Island Concerning proposed amendments to
Section 36-70 (B-3) Heavy Business Zone relative to the required setbacks Section 36-
102 Landscaping Requirements relative to the R-3SL Medium Density Small Lot Zone, B-3
Heavy Business Zone and additions and enlargements of existing improvements in any
zoning district. (C-26-2019GI)
Consent Agenda:
8.Preliminary Plat – Ellington Pointe- Grand Island- A Tract of Land Consisting of all of
Lot 2 Hanover Second Subdivision and all of Lot 4 Hanover Third Subdivision all in Grand
Island, Hall County, Nebraska. Located south of 13th Street and west of North Road.
9.Final Plat – Five-H Ranch Subdivision Hall County- A Tract of Land consisting of part of
the Southeast Quarter (SE ¼) of Section Thirty Two (32), Township Eleven (11) North,
Range Eleven (11) West of the 6th P.M, Hall County, Nebraska. West of 130th Road and
north of Schimmer Drive.
10.Final Plat – Peters Ventures Subdivision Hall County- A Tract of Land consisting of
part of the Northeast Quarter (NE ¼) of Section Twenty Eight (28), Township Twelve (12)
North, Range Ten (10) West of the 6th P.M, Hall County, Nebraska. West of Monitor
Road and south of White Cloud Road.
11.Budget
12.Directors Report
13.Next Meeting July 3, 2019.
14.Adjourn.
PLEASE NOTE: This meeting is open to the public, and a current agenda is on file at the
office of the Regional Planning Commission, located on the second floor of City Hall in
Grand Island, Nebraska.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 5 / 136
Staff Recommendation Summary
For Regional Planning Commission Meeting
June 5, 2019
4.Public Hearing – One and Six Year Road Plan – Hall County – Public
hearing and action on Hall County’s 2020 to 2025 road improvement plan.
Hall County Engineer Steve Riehle will present the plan. A motion is in
order. (C-27-2018HC) (Hearing, Discussion, Action)
5.Public Hearing – Substandard and Blight Study: Concerning a study to
determine if the proposed CRA Area #16 qualifies as substandard and
blighted and to forward a recommendation on the study to the Grand
Island City Council. Proposed CRA Area #16 is approximately 569.09
acres of property in northern Grand Island north of State Street and east
of Webb Road including the all of the Central Nebraska Veterans Home
property (C-24-2019GI). See Full Recommendation (Hearing, Discussion
Action)
6.Public Hearing – Substandard and Blight Study: Concerning a study to
determine if the proposed CRA Area #29 qualifies as substandard and
blighted and to forward a recommendation on the study to the Grand
Island City Council. Proposed CRA Area #29 is approximately 33.18
acres of property in southern Grand Island south of Wildwood Drive and
east of U.S. Highway 281 including the former Lewis Greenscape property
(C-25-2019GI). See Full Recommendation (Hearing, Discussion Action)
7.Public Hearing -- Text Amendment to The Grand Island Zoning
Regulations. Concerning proposed amendments to Section 36-70 (B-3)
Heavy Business Zone relative to the required setbacks Section 36-102
Landscaping Requirements relative to the R-3SL Medium Density Small Lot
Zone, B-3 Heavy Business Zone and additions and enlargements of existing
improvements in any zoning district. (C-26-2019GI) See Full
Recommendation (Hearing, Discussion Action)
8.Preliminary Plat – Ellington Pointe- Grand Island- A Tract of Land
Consisting of all of Lot 2 Hanover Second Subdivision and all of Lot 4
Hanover Third Subdivision all in Grand Island, Hall County, Nebraska.
Located south of 13th Street and west of North Road. The property is zoned
both R3 Medium Density Residential and R1 Suburban Density Residential.
All proposed street are 37’ concrete curb and gutter. Sewer and Water will
be extended to serve all lots.
9.Final Plat – Five-H Ranch Subdivision Hall County- A Tract of Land
consisting of part of the Southeast Quarter (SE ¼) of Section Thirty Two
(32), Township Eleven (11) North, Range Eleven (11) West of the 6th P.M,
Hall County, Nebraska. West of 130th Road and north of Schimmer Drive.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 6 / 136
The property is zoned A1 Primary Agriculture. This splits and existing
farmstead from a tract of 20 acre or more.
10.Final Plat – Peters Ventures Subdivision Hall County- A Tract of Land
consisting of part of the Northeast Quarter (NE ¼) of Section Twenty Eight
(28), Township Twelve (12) North, Range Ten (10) West of the 6th P.M, Hall
County, Nebraska. West of Monitor Road and south of White Cloud Road.
This property is zoned A2 Secondary Agriculture. The minimum lot size for a
parcel in the A2 zoning district is 3 acres. This meets the minimum
requirements for a new lot.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 7 / 136
Hall County Regional Planning
Commission
Wednesday, June 5, 2019
Regular Meeting
Item E1
Meeting Minutes
Staff Contact:
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 8 / 136
THE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION OF HALL COUNTY, GRAND ISLAND,
WOOD RIVER AND THE VILLAGES OF ALDA, CAIRO, AND DONIPHAN,
NEBRASKA
Minutes
for
May 1, 2019
The meeting of the Regional Planning Commission was held Wednesday, May 1, 2019, at City
Hall – Grand Island, Nebraska. Notice of this meeting appeared in the "Grand Island
Independent" on April 19, 2019.
Present: Pat O’Neill Leslie Ruge Dean Kjar
Judd Allan Jaye Monter Robin Hendricksen
Carla Maurer Leonard Rainforth Tony Randone
Darrel Nelson Hector Rubio
Absent: Gregg Robb
Other:
Staff: Chad Nabity, Rashad Moxey, Norma Hernandez
Press:
1.Call to order.
Chairman O’Neill called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
O’Neill stated that this was a public meeting subject to the open meetings laws of the
State of Nebraska. He noted that the requirements for an open meeting are posted on
the wall in the room and easily accessible to anyone who may be interested in reading
them.
O’Neill also noted the Planning Commission may vote to go into Closed Session on
any agenda item as allowed by State Law.
The Commission will discuss and may take action on any item listed on this agenda.
The order of items on the agenda may be reorganized by the Chair to facilitate the flow
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 9 / 136
of the meeting to better accommodate the public.
2. Minutes of the April 3, 2019 meeting.
A motion was made by Hendricksen and seconded by Rubio to approve the
minutes of the April 3, 2019 meeting.
The motion carried with nine members in favor (O’Neill, Nelson, Ruge, Maurer,
Monter, Rubio, Hedricksen, Randone and Rainforth) and two members abstaining
(Allan, Kjar).
3.Request Time to Speak.
The following requested time to speak during discussion: Karen Bredthauer,
940 S. North Road, Grand Island, NE; Item # 7
4.Public Hearing - Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Concerning a change to the
Future Land use map for the City of Grand Island for lots 11-14 of Lambert’s
Subdivision located between Congdon Avenue and Willow Street north of 4th Street
from Manufacturing to Low to Medium Residential in Grand Island, Hall County,
Nebraska. (C-20-2019GI)
5. Public Hearing – Zoning Change – Concerning a request to rezone lots 11-14 of
Lambert’s Subdivision located between Congdon Avenue and Willow Street north of
4th Street from M2 Heavy Manufacturing to R-3SL Medium Density Small Lot
Residential in Grand Island, Hall County, Nebraska. (C-21-2019GI)
6.Public Hearing – Redevelopment Plan – Starostka Contracting LLC. – Concerning
an amendment to the redevelopment plan for CRA Area No. 1 to allow for
redevelopment Lots 11, 12, and parts of lots 13 and 14 of Lambert’s Subdivision in
Grand Island, Nebraska for the development of 20 single family residential lots
including acquisition, grading and demolition and installation necessary utilities and
streets. (C-19-2019GI)
O’Neill opened the public hearings on items 4, 5 and 6.
Nabity stated the proposal is to amend the future land use map of the City of Grand
Island in the Comprehensive Plan. The property that is under consideration a portion of
the property is planned for manufacturing and a portion for Low to Medium
Residential. It makes sense to change it so that it’s all Low to Medium Residential. The
north portions of the property are already Low to Medium Residential even though they
are zoned Manufacturing. The proposal is to rezone all of it to R3-SL zone. The R3-SL
zone allows smaller lot sizes, 1 unit per 3,000 square feet unless it’s a townhome. The
lots that they are proposing are all in the 4,500 to 9,000 square feet depending on the
size and shape of the lot. If the comprehensive plan is amended the property can be
rezoned to R3-SL Medium Density Residential Zone, which will allow residential
development.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 10 / 136
Nabity stated that the redevelopment plan and TIF would be used for the demolition of
the existing structures, for site grading, and to pay for streets and sewer and water.
O’Neill closed the public hearing.
A motion was made by Randone and seconded by Rainforth to approve a change to the
Future Land use map for the City of Grand Island for lots 11-14 Lambert’s Subdivision.
The motion carried with eleven members in favor (O’Neill, Nelson, Allan, Ruge,
Maurer, Monter, Rubio, Rainforth, Hendricksen, Randone and Kjar) and members
voting no.
A motion was made by Ruge and second by Rainforth to approve the zone change on
lots 11-14 of Lambert’s Subdivision located between Congdon Avenue and Willow
Street from M2 Heavy Manufacturing to R-3SL Medium Density Small Lot
Residential.
The motion carried with eleven members in favor (Nelson, Allan, O’Neill, Ruge,
Maurer, Rubio, Monter, Rainforth, Hendricksen, Randone and Kjar) no members
voting no.
A motion was made by Rainforth and second by Randone to approve redevelopment
plan concerning an amendment to the redevelopment plan for CRA Area No. 1 to allow
for redevelopment lots 11, 12 and parts of lots 13 and 14 of Lambert’s Subdivision
along with resolution 2019-09.
The motion was carried with eleven members in favor (Nelson, Allan, O’Neill, Ruge,
Maurer, Rubio, Monter, Rainforth, Hendricksen, Randone and Kjar) no members
voting no.
7.Public Hearing – Zoning Change – Concerning a request to rezone a portion of lot 1
Hanover Second Subdivision and portion of lot 4 Hanover Third Subdivision located
west of north road and south of 13th Street from R1 – Suburban Density Residential to
R-3 Medium Density Residential in Grand Island, Hall County, Nebraska.
(C-22-2019GI)
O’Neill opened the public meeting
Nabity explained the proposal is to rezone the center section of the property from R1 to
R-3. It will leave a strip of R1 along the large lot residential immediately to the south.
It will also leave the lots immediately against North Road as R1 and will allow them to
build some duplexes and townhome units in the center portion of the property. A
preliminary and final plat will be coming forward for the June meeting. The area is
planned Low to Medium Density Residential and this change is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan. Nabity recommends approval.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 11 / 136
Karen Bredthauer, 940 S. North Road, Grand Island, NE; Item # 7, Karen asked
why the south part was not being rezoned. Nabity explained that it was not
being rezoned so that larger lots would back onto the existing lots on Driftwood
and houses similar to those on Driftwood could be built there.
O’Neill closed the public meeting
A motion was made by Ruge and second by Nelson to approve the request to rezone a
portion of lot 1 Hanover Second Subdivision and portion of lot 4 Hanover Third
Subdivision.
The motion was carried with eleven members in favor (Nelson, Allan, O’Neill, Ruge,
Maurer, Rubio, Monter, Rainforth, Hendricksen, Randone and Kjar) no members
voting no.
8.Public Hearing – Adoption of the Grand Island Zoning Map. Public
Hearing to re-adopt the City of Grand Island Zoning Map, with proposed
changes as produced changes using the Hall County Geographic Information
System. This map will serve to give notice to all parties that the zoning
districts, Grand Island City limits, and 2- mile extraterritorial zoning jurisdiction
are as shown on the zoning map. A copy of the proposed changes will be
available at the Hall County Regional Planning Department office located at the
Grand Island City Hall. (C-23-2019GI)
O’Neill opened the public hearing.
Nabity explained that periodically the Grand Island zoning map is re-adopted
incorporating all the changes that have been made since time it was adopted. The last
time it was adopted was February 2018. The proposal is to send it to council in June
meeting so it will be adopted and effective in July 1, 2019. All of annexations that are
currently under way will be included which are: Lewis Acres on Hwy 281 and
Wildwood Road, Part of the Veteran’s Home property (immediately to the west of
Eagle Scout Lake), Hanover Subdivision, Hanover Second Subdivision, Rowe’s
Second Subdivision, Knuth Subdivision, Gard Subdivision, Reif Acres Subdivision. All
zoning changes adopted since the last map was adopted will be included. One change to
be proposed to be incorporated to this map is to change the Rhoades Subdivision from
R-3 and R-2 to R-2.
O’Neill closed the public hearing.
A motion was made by Monter and second by Nelson to adopt the proposed changes to
the Grand Island Zoning Map.
The motion was carried with eleven members in favor (Nelson, Allan, O’Neill, Ruge,
Maurer, Rubio, Monter, Rainforth, Hendricksen, Randone and Kjar) no members
voting no.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 12 / 136
Consent Agenda:
9.Final Plat – Orchard Subdivision Grand Island – A Tract of Land Consisting of all
of Lot 1, Lincoln Heights Subdivision, part of lots 2,3,4,5 and 8 of Norwood
Subdivision and the part of the east half of the Northwest Quarter of (E ½ NW ¼ ) of
Section Ten (10), Township Eleven (11) North, Range Nine (9) West of the 6th P.M., all
in Grand Island, Hall County, Nebraska. 65 lots and 2 outlots zoned R3-SL, Peach
Street will be built at 32 foot wide. All other streets will be 37 foot wide connections
will be made to the north into Lassonde Third Subdivision and on 14th Street.
10.Preliminary and Final Plat – Fifth Street Subdivision Grand Island- A Replat of
Lots 11 and 12 and parts of lots 13 and 14 of Lambert’s Subdivision in the City of
Grand Island, Hall County, Nebraska. Proposed for rezoning to R3-SL 3.3 acres, 20
lots one new street 32 foot width with offset driveways.
11.Final Plat – Thelen Fifth Subdivision Wood River- A Tract of Land Consisting of
Part of the Northwest Quarter (NW ¼) of Section Nineteen (19), Township Ten (10)
North, Range Eleven (11) West of the 6th P.M, in Wood River Hall County, Nebraska.
Zoned R9, 1.667 acres, 14 lots.
12. Final Plat – Virgil Powell Subdivision Alda- A Tract of Land Comprising a part of
the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (SE ¼ SE ¼ ) of Section Thirty Two
(32), Township Eleven (11) North, Range Ten (10) West of the 6th P.M., Hall County,
Nebraska. One lot 4.51 acres zoned BG Highway Commercial Zone.
13.Final Plat – JRMorton Farm Subdivision Hall County – A Tract of Land consisting
of part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼ SW ¼) of Section
Twenty Three (23), Township Ten (10) North, Range Nine (9) West of the 6th P.M.,
Hall County, Nebraska. One lot 3.541 Acres zoned AGV this splits an existing
farmstead from a tract of 20 acres or more.
14.Final Plat – Crossroads Subdivision – A Replat of parts of Block 5 of Golden Age
Subdivision in the City of Grand Island, Hall County, Nebraska. 2 Lots, 0.992 Acres,
zoned RO Residential Office. The school board was notified of this pending
subdivision in February 2019.
A motion was made by Rainforth and second by Allan to approve all items on the
consent agenda.
The motion was carried with eleven members in favor (Nelson, Allan, O’Neill, Ruge,
Maurer, Rubio, Monter, Rainforth, Hendricksen, Randone and Kjar) no members
voting no.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 13 / 136
15.Director’s Report
Nabity mentioned the Community Beautification Award was not done last year. Nabity
asked members if it should be done this year. Member’s decided it should be done this
year.
16.Adjourn.
O’Neill adjourned the meeting at 6:27 p.m.
Next Planning Commission meeting June 5, 2019
___________________________________________
Leslie Ruge, Secretary
By Norma Hernandez
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 14 / 136
Hall County Regional Planning
Commission
Wednesday, June 5, 2019
Regular Meeting
Item F1
Public Hearing - Hall County One & Six Year Road Plan
Staff Contact:
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 15 / 136
2019-2020
ONE AND SIX YEAR
ROAD PROGRAM
HALL COUNTY,
NEBRASKA
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 16 / 136
NC40(171)-1C40(372)C40(373)C40(340)C40(340)C40(432)C40(475)
C40(474)C40(470)C40(469)C40(472)C40(473)C40(468)C40(471)C40(462)C40(467)Grand IslandRegular Meeting - 6/5/2019Page 17 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 11 Report of Previous Year
Highway or Street Improvement
Year Ending: Fiscal Year End June 30, 2020 Sheet 1 of 1
County:
HALL
City:
Village:
PROJECT
NUMBER
LENGTH
(Nearest
Tenth)
UNIT OF
MEASURE
PROJECTED
COST
(Thousands)
CONTRACT
PROJECT
OWN
FORCES
DATE
COMPLETED
(Actual or
Estimated)
C40(340) 0.1 MILE 250 X Delay 1 year
C40(372) 0.1 MILE 250 x X Delay 1 year
C40(373) 0.1 MILE 150 x X Delay 1 year
C40(432) 0.1 MILE 15 X Delay 1 year
C40(434) 0.2 MILE 115 X Move to 6 yr
C40(435) 0.1 MILE 105 X Move to 6 yr
C40(449) 2.0 MILE 50 X 11-2018
C40(462) 0.1 MILE 15 X Delay 1 year
C40(463) 0.1 MILE 15 X 02-2019
C40(464) 0.1 MILE 15 X Move to 6 yr
C40(465) 0.1 MILE 15 X 3-2019
C40(466) 0.1 MILE 85 X Move to 6 yr
TOTAL 1080
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 11, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 18 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 8 Summary of One-Year Plan
Year Ending: Fiscal year end June 30, 2020 Sheet 1 of 1
County:
C40 - Hall County
City:
Village:
PRIORITY
NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER LENGTH
(Nearest Tenth)
UNIT OF
MEASURE
ESTIMATED COST
(Thousands) REMARKS
1 C40(340) 0.1 MILE 94 BRIDGE-CBMPl
2 C40(372) 0.2 MILE 250 BRIDGE-LOCAL
3 C40(373) 0.1 MILE 150 CBC-COLECTOR
5 4C40(432) 0.1 MILE 15 CBC-LOCAL
6 5 C40(462) 0.1 MILE 15 CMP LOCAL
6 C40(171)-1 0.1 MILE 724 BRIDGE-FED AID
7 C40(467) 0.1 MILE 40 DRAINAGE STUDY
8 C40(468) 2.0 MILE 20 DRAINAGE STUDY
9 C40(469) 2.3 MILE 360 ASPHALT OVERLAY
10 C40(470) 2.0 MILE 230 ASPHALT OVERLAY
11 C40(471) 1.0 MILE 180 ASPHALT OVERLAY
12 C40(472) 1.5 MILE 220 ASPHALT OVERLAY
13 C40(473) 1.0 MILE 150 ASPHALT OVERLAY
14 C40(474) 1.0 MILE 150 ASPHALT OVERLAY
15 C40(475) 1.0 MILE 150 ASPHALT OVERLAY
COUNTY 1979
STATE 119
OTHER 90
FEDERAL 580
TOTAL 2768
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 8, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 19 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C40 - Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
On 70th Road between Highway 2 and Airport Road; Between Section 31 & 32, T-12-N, R-10-W of the
6th P.M., Hall County, NE
70th Road 24U3
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Gravel and timber Bridge
Average Daily Traffic:
2008 = 56, 2028 = 100
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
Table 2-001.03J Surfacing Thickness:
3"
Width:
24'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
84"
Length:
38'
Type:
Triple CMP
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Replace existing 20' x 28' timber bridge with Triple 84" X 38' CMP's with Headwalls & wingwalls
Bridge bullt in 1970
NDOR Structure Number C004022715
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
47 47 94
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.1 mile
Project No.:
C40(340)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 20 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
Sky Park Road between Chapman Road and Prairie Road, between Section 10 and Section 11,
T 12 N, R 9 W.
County mile: 6Y 05
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Gravel and Steel Pony Truss Bridge 20' x 52'
Average Daily Traffic:
2008 = 95, 2038 = 115
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
Triple 2-0001.03J Surfacing Thickness:
2"
Width:
20'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
30'
Length:
81'
Type:
Conc. Precast Panel
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Replace 3 span concrete precast panel bridge. County to remove old bridge and perform channel work,
backfill, roadway grading and Contractor to build new bridge. Built in 1935
C004024325
Posted 8 Ton
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
250 250
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.2 Mile
Project No.:
C40(372)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 21 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
Intersection of Engleman Road, Airport Road and Nebr. State Hwy. No. 2. NW 1/4 of Section 2, T 11 N,
R 10 W
County Bridge No. 18-T-9
County mile: 18T, 37J, & 37H
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Asphalt and Steel Girder Bridge
Average Daily Traffic:
2008 = 1000, 2028 = 1500
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
NFC: Rural Minor Collector, SFC: Collector
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
Table 2-001.03i Surfacing Thickness:
6"
Width:
24'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
12'
Rise:
10'
Length:
48'
Type:
Concrete Box
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Replace 25.5' X 50' Steel Girder Bridge with concrete box culvert. Reconstruct south intersection of
Engleman Road and Airport Road with Nebr. State Hwy. No. 2 to improve angle of the approach and
raise Engleman Road grade to accommodate Central Platte NRD drainage project for Silver Creek.
Bridge built in 1972.
NDOR Sructure Number C004013311
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
100 50 150
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.1 Mile
Project No.:
C40(373)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 22 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
Rosedale Road between Sections 26 and 35, T-9-N, R-11-W between 90th Road and Schauppsville
Road
County Bridge No. 3P5
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Asphalt, 3' x 5' x 24' CBC
Average Daily Traffic:
2014 = 300, 2034 = 500
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
SFC: Other Arterial, NFC: Rural Major Collector
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
Table 2-001.03H Surfacing Thickness:
Width:
'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
5'
Rise:
3'
Length:
40'
Type:
CBC
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Add on to 3' rise x 5' span x 24' long Concrete Box Culvert to meet Horizontal Clear Zone standards.
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
15 15
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.1 Mile
Project No.:
C40(432)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 23 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
North of Capital Avenue on Burwick Road, between Section 4 and Section 5, Township 11 North,
Range 11 West.
County Bridge No. 34 T 1
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Wood 12' x 20' Bridge
Average Daily Traffic:
2018 = 70, 2038 = 90
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
Table 2 001.03J Surfacing Thickness:
2"
Width:
20'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
TBD
Length:
TBD
Type:
CMP
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Replace wood bridge built in 1936 w/ CMP's
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
15 15
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.1 Mile
Project No.:
C40(462)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 24 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
On a north and south road between Section 27 & 28, T-12-N, R-10-W of the 6th P.M., Hall County, NE
Monitor Road 20 V 9
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Gravel and Bridge
Average Daily Traffic:
2008 = 25, 2028 = 45
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local-Fed Aid
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
Surfacing Thickness:
Width:
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
30'
Length:
102'
Type:
conc slab
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Replace existing 16' x 46' Truss Bridge
*COUNTY SHARE $15,000 OF NON PARTICIPATING FEDERAL AID
* 72,000 WILL BE FUNDED BY SOFT MATCH CREDITS
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
72 72 580 724
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.1
Project No.:
C40(171) BRO7040(25)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 25 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
DRAINAGE STUDY: IN COOPERATION WITH THE CENTAL PLATTE NRD FOR POSSIBLE
FLOOD CONTROL MEASURES ALONG SILVER CREEK TO PROTECT PROPERTIES ALONG
AIRPORT RD AND NORTH ROAD
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
N/A FLOOD CONTROL
Average Daily Traffic:
20 = N/A, 20 = N/A
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
N/A
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
N/A Surfacing Thickness:
Width:
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
POSSIBLE CLEANING OF THE SLOUGH FROM NORTH ROAD TO U.S. HWY 281.
BERM WORK ALONG RIGHT BANK OF SILVER CREEK BETWEEN THE BNSF RAILROAD TRACKS
AND AIRPORT ROAD.
STUDY OF OVERFLOWS FROM DRY CREEK AT PRAIRIE CREEK INTO SILVER CREEK FOR
POSSIBLE LEVEE.
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
20 20 40
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
N/A
Project No.:
C40(467)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 26 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
6 N STUHR ROAD
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
DRAINAGE STUDY AND POSSIBLE DITCH CLEANOUT DOWNSTREAM OF FARMSTEAD SUB TO
CONCRETE BOX CULVERT TO US HWY 34 EAST OF STUHR ROAD
Average Daily Traffic:
2019 = N/A, 20 =
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
N/A
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
N/A Surfacing Thickness:
N/A
Width:
N/A
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
T.B.D.
Length:
T.B.D.
Type:
T.B.D.
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
20 20 40
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
N/A
Project No.:
C40(468)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 27 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City: Village:
Location Description:
31 N & 31 P OLD POTASH HIGHWAY
BETWEEN SECTIONS 14 & 23 AND SECTIONS 13 & 24, T-11-N, R-11-W
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
ASPHALTIC CONCRETE, LAST OVERLAYED IN 1999 WITH 2" OF TYPE C MIX. ORIGINAL
CONSTRUCTION PERFORMED BY THE ARMY IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF
CAAP.
Average Daily Traffic:
2019 = 800, 2039 = 1080
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
LOCAL
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
TABLE 2-001.03J Surfacing Thickness:
2-1/2" - 3"
Width:
24'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type:
Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type:
Culvert Diameter: Length: Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
RESURFACE EXISTING 24' WIDE ROADWAY WITH 2-1/2" TO 3" OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
360 360
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
2.3 MILE
Project No.:
C40(469)
Signature: Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 28 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
33 J & 33 K 13TH STREET, BETWEEN SECTION 8 & 17 AND SECTIONS 9 & 16, T-11-N, R-10-W
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
ASPHALTIC CONCRETE, LAST OVERLAYED 3" OF TYPE B MIX IN 1987. CONSTRUCTION
PERFORMED IN 1987 WITH 2" TYPE "BC" MIX
Average Daily Traffic:
2019 = 200, 2039 = 270
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
LOCAL
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
TABLE 2-001.03J Surfacing Thickness:
2"
Width:
24'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
MILL EXISTING 24' WIDE ROADWAY APPROXIMATELY 1/2" TO 3/4" DEEP AND SURFACE WITH 2"
OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
230 230
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
2.0 MILE
Project No.:
C40(470)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 29 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
MEADOW LANE SUBDIVISION
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
3-1/2" TO 4" OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE WAS PLACED THE 1970'S. SOME OF THE ROADS
WERE RESURFACED WITH 2" OF MIX IN 1997.
Average Daily Traffic:
2019 = 200, 2039 = 240
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
LOCAL
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
TABLE 2-001.03J Surfacing Thickness:
2-1/2"-3"
Width:
24'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
RESURFACE EXISTING 24'WIDE ROADWAYS WITH 2-1/2" -3" OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE
CONSIDER CONRAD DRIVE FROM GRAVEL TO PAVED ROAD AS PART OF THE PROJECT
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
180 180
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
1.0 MILE
Project No.:
C40(471)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 30 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
25 G & 25 H SCHIMMER DRIVE BETWEEN SECTION 35, T-11-N, R-10-W AND SECTION 36, T-
10-N, R-10-N.
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
ASPHALTIC CONCRETE-THE MILE OF SCHIMMER DR BETWEEN ENGLEMAN ROAD AND
NORTH RD WAS CONVERTED FROM GRAVEL TO ASPHALT WITH 5-1/2" OF TYPE "B" MIX IN
1994. SCHIMMER DR BETWEEN NORTH ROAD AND US HWY 34/281 WAS CONVERTED FROM
GRAVEL TO ASPHAL WITH 5-1/2" TYPE "A" MIX IN A JOINT PROJECT WITH THE CITY OF G.I. IN
2004
Average Daily Traffic:
2019 = 250, 2039 = 340
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
LOCAL
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
TABLE 2-001.03J Surfacing Thickness:
2-1/2"-3"
Width:
24'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
RESURFACE EXISTING 24'WIDE ROADWAYS WITH 2-1/2" -3" OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE
DO AS A COOPERATIVE PROJECT WITH THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND'S 1-1/2 MILE PROJECT
WHEN RESURFACING OF THEIR SCHIMMER DRIVE AND 1/2 MILE WEST OF BLAINE TO HWY
34/281.
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
220 220
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
1.5 MILE
Project No.:
C40(472)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 31 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
16 M NORTH ROAD, BETWEEN SECTIONS 1 & 2, T-10-N, R-10-W
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
ASPHALTICE CONCRETE CONVERTED FROM GRAVEL WITH 5-1/2" OF TYPE "A" IN 2004
Average Daily Traffic:
2019 = 250, 2039 = 340
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
LOCAL
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
TABLE 2-001.03J Surfacing Thickness:
2-1/2"-3"
Width:
24'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
RESURFACE EXISTING 24'WIDE ROADWAYS WITH 2-1/2" -3" OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
150 150
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
1.0 MILE
Project No.:
C40(473)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 32 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
18 U ENGLEMAN ROAD, BETWEEN SECTIONS 34 & 35, T-12-N, R-10-W
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
ASPHALTICE CONCRETE CONVERTED FROM GRAVEL WITH 5-1/2" OF TYPE "B" IN 2002
Average Daily Traffic:
2019 = 287, 2039 = 386
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
LOCAL
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
TABLE 2-001.03J Surfacing Thickness:
2-1/2"-3"
Width:
24'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
RESURFACE EXISTING 24'WIDE ROADWAYS WITH 2-1/2" -3" OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
150 150
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
1.0 MILE
Project No.:
C40(474)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 33 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
14 U WEBB ROAD, BETWEEN SECTION 36, T-12-N, R-10-W AND SECTION 32, T-9-N, R-9-W
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
ASPHALTICE CONCRETE CONVERTED FROM GRAVEL WITH 5-1/2" OF TYPE "B" IN 2002
Average Daily Traffic:
2019 = 456, 2039 = 615
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
LOCAL
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
TABLE 2-001.03J Surfacing Thickness:
2-1/2"-3"
Width:
24'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
RESURFACE EXISTING 24'WIDE ROADWAYS WITH 2-1/2" -3" OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
150 150
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
1.0 MILE
Project No.:
C40(475)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 34 / 136
NC40(135)C40(300)-2C40(367)C40(371)C40(389)C40(391)C40(392)C40(135)C40(371)C40(467)C40(389)C40(391)C40(392)C40(376)C40(376)C40(422)C40(422)C40(424)C40(425)C40(425)C40(121)-2C40(121)-2C40(427)C40(464)C40(426)C40(435)C40(435)C40(434)C40(434)C40(461)C40(461)C40(476)C40(466)Grand IslandRegular Meeting - 6/5/2019Page 35 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 9 Summary of Six-Year Plan
Six-Year Period Ending: June 30, 2025 Sheet 1 of 1
County:
C40 - Hall County
City:
Village:
PRIORITY
NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER LENGTH
(Nearest Tenth)
UNIT OF
MEASURE
ESTIMATED COST
(Thousands) REMARKS
1 C40(121)-2 4.0 MILE 1,100 PAVING-LOCAL
2 C40(135) 0.25 MILE 150 BRIDGE-LOCAL
3 C40(464) 0.1 MILE 15 CMP-LOCAL
4 C40(300)-2 2.0 MILE 550 PAVING-LOCAL
5 C40(367) 0.1 MILE 150 BRIDGE - LOCAL
6 C40(371) 0.1 MILE 200 BRIDGE - LOCAL
7 C40(376) 0.1 MILE 100 BRIDGE-LOCAL
8 C40(379) 0.1 MILE 85 BRIDGE - LOCAL
9 C40(389) 0.1 MILE 85 BRIDGE - LOCAL
10 C40(391) 0.1 MILE 200 BRIDGE - LOCAL
11 C40(392) 0.1 MILE 300 BRIDGE - LOCAL
12 C40(422) 0.1 MILE 50 CONC BOX-
LOCAL
13 C40(424) 0.1 MILE 30 CONC BOX-LOCAL
14 C40(425) 0.1 MILE 30 CONC BOX-LOCAL
15 C40(426) 1.0 MILE 225 PAVING-LOCAL
16 C40(427) 1.0 MILE 225 PAVING-LOCAL
17 C40(461) 0.1 MILE 20 BRIDGE-LOCAL
18 C40(467) 0.1 MILE 50 CMP-LOCAL
19 C40(466) 0.1 MILE 85 BRIDGE-LOCAL
20 C40(434) 0.2 MILE 115 CBC-LOCAL
21 C40(435) 0.1 MILE 105 CBC-LOCAL
22 C40(476) 3.0 MILE 900 ASPHALT CONST
23
TOTAL 4740
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 9, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 36 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C40 - Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
On an east and west road beginning at the southwest corner of Section 13, T-12-N, R-11-W; thence
easterly 4.0 miles to the southwest corner of Section 15, T-12-N, R-10-W
One-R Road 43K, L, M & N
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Gravel and Culverts
Average Daily Traffic:
2013 = 175, 2033 = 350
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Other Arterial
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
ROA-3 Surfacing Thickness:
6"
Width:
24.0
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
5" x 24' Asphalt or 6" X 24' Concretet
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
1,100 1,100
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
4.0 miles
Project No.:
C40(121)-2
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 37 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C40 - Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
On an east and west road between Section 7 & 18, T-11-N, R-11-W of the 6th P.M., Hall County,
NE
13th Street 33 T 6
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Gravel and Bridge
Average Daily Traffic:
2008 = 45, 2028 = 90
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
RL-3 Surfacing Thickness:
Width:
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
30'
Length:
60'
Type:
Conc Slab
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Replace existing 16' x 40' truss bridge, channel change and straighten road
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
150 150
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.25 mile
Project No.:
C40(135)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 38 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
East of St. Paul Road on Loup River Road, north side of Section 2, Township 12 North, Range 9 West,
Hall-Howard County Line.
County Bridge 49 B 6
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Wood 18' x 24' Bridge
Average Daily Traffic:
2018 = 45, 2038 = 65
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
Table 2-001.03J Surfacing Thickness:
2"
Width:
20'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
TBD
Length:
TBD
Type:
CMP
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Replace 18' x 24' bridge w/CMP's
Built 1949
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
15 15
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.1 Miles
Project No.:
C40(464)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 39 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C40 - Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
On a north and south road beginning at the intersection of Engleman Road and Abbott Road; thence 2
miles north.
Engleman Road 18 V & 18 W
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Gravel and bridge
Average Daily Traffic:
2013 = 200, 2033 = 400
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
RL-1 Surfacing Thickness:
6"
Width:
24.0
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
5" x 24' Asphalt or 6" X 24' Concrete
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
550 550
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
2.0 miles
Project No.:
C40(300)-2
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 40 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
190th Road between Old Military Road and Holling Road. Section 32, T 10 N, R 12 W.
County mile: 48G 08
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Gravel and Thru Truss Bridge
Average Daily Traffic:
2008 = 75, 2028 = 175
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
RL-2 Surfacing Thickness:
Width:
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
30'
Length:
60'
Type:
Conc. Slab
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Replace 61' thru truss bridge with 60' X 30' prestressed concrete slab bridge.
C004000310
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
150 150
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.1 Mile
Project No.:
C40(367)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 41 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
60th Road between Wildwood Drive and Guenther Road. Section 9, T 10 N, R 10 W
County mile: 22L 06
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Gravel and Thru Truss Bridge
Average Daily Traffic:
2008 = 55, 2028 = 75
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
RL-2 Surfacing Thickness:
2"
Width:
20'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
30'
Length:
70'
Type:
Conc. Slab
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Replace 71' thru truss bridge with 70' X 30' prestressed concrete slab bridge.
C004012910
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
200 200
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.1 Mile
Project No.:
C40(371)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 42 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
Schauppsville Road between Capital Avenue and 13th Street. Section 11, T 11 N, R 11 W.
County mile: 30S 04
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Gravel and I-beam bridge
Average Daily Traffic:
2013 = 175, 2033 = 225
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Collector
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
RC-2 Surfacing Thickness:
2"
Width:
20'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
30'
Length:
30'
Type:
Conc. Slab
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Replace 33' X 18.5' - 15" I-beam bridge with 30' X 30' prestressed concrete slab bridge.
C004012115
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
100 100
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.1 Mile
Project No.:
C40(376)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 43 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
70th Road between Barrows Road and Rosedale Road. 0.3 miles North of SE Corner of Section 31, T-
9-N, R-10-W.
County Mile: 24A 03
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Gravel, steel bridge
Average Daily Traffic:
2008 = 35, 2008 = 55
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
RL-3 Surfacing Thickness:
Width:
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
30'
Length:
30'
Type:
Precast Conc. Slab
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Replace steel bridge with 30' X 30' precast concrete slab bridge.
Bridge built in 1968.
C004002703
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
85 85
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.1
Project No.:
C40(379)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 44 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
13th street between Schauppsville Road and 110th Road
0.1 mile west of NE corner, Section 15, T-11-N, R-11-W.
County Mile: 33Q1
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Gravel and a 15" I Beam Bridge
Average Daily Traffic:
2012 = 60, 2032 = 80
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
RL-2 Surfacing Thickness:
Width:
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
30'
Length:
30'
Type:
Precast Conc. Slab
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Replace 15" I beam bridge with 30' X 30' precast concrete slab bridge.
C004001815
Bridge built in 1931
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
85 85
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.1
Project No.:
C40(389)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 45 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
Old Potash Highway between Cameron Road and McGuire Road.
0.9 mile west of the NE corner. Section 22. T-11-N. R-12-W.
County Mile: 31W09
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Gravel, concrete box I and beam bridge combination.
Average Daily Traffic:
2008 = 100, 2008 = 125
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
RL2 Surfacing Thickness:
2"
Width:
24'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
30'
Length:
42'
Type:
concrete steel
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Replace 41' concrete box and steel I beam combination bridge
C004002005
Bridge built in 1928 and 1942
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
200 200
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.1 mile
Project No.:
C40(391)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 46 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
Schimmer Drive between Bluff Center Road and 190th Road.
0.7 mile west of NE corner section 5. T-10-N. R-12-W
County Mile: 25Y07
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Gravel, I Beam and timber combination bridge.
Average Daily Traffic:
2008 = 35, 2008 = 55
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
RL-3 Surfacing Thickness:
Width:
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
30'
Length:
64'
Type:
concrete steel
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Replace 64' steel I beam and timber combination bridge.
C004002605
Bridge built in 1941
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
300 300
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.1 mile
Project No.:
C40(392)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 47 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
On an east and west road between Sections 14 and 23, T-12-N, R-9-W of the 6th P.M., Hall County,
Nebraska on One-R Road between Quandt Road and Sky Park Road.
County Road 43B 03
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Existing 12' span by 6' rise concrete box culvert built in 1930 on a gravel road.
Average Daily Traffic:
2013 = 45, 2033 = 55
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
RL-3 Surfacing Thickness:
Gravel
Width:
22'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Triple 8'
Rise:
5'
Length:
36'
Type:
CBC
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Replace existing narrow concrete box culvert with Triple 8' X 5' X 36' precast concrete box sections
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
50 50
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.1
Project No.:
C40(422)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 48 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
South Locust Street, between Cedarview Road and Giltner Road, between Sections 3 and 4, T-9-N, R-
9-W, Hall County, Nebraska
County Mile: 8F 09
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Asphalt Road Surface
Existing structure is 12' X 4' Concrete Box in good condition
Average Daily Traffic:
2013 = 1000, 2033 = 1500
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Other Arterial
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
ROA-1 Surfacing Thickness:
Width:
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Twin 6'
Rise:
4'
Length:
48'
Type:
Twin Conc. Box
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Addition of twin 6' X 4' X 48' precast concrete box culvert sections along side existing 12' X 4' Concrete
Box Structure to increase drainage capacity.
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
30 30
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.1
Project No.:
C40(424)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 49 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
Cedarview Road, between South Locust Street and Stuhr Road, on the north side of Section 3, T-9-N,
R-9-W, Hall County, Nebraska
County Mile: 13C 09
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Gravel Road Surface
Existing structure is Twin 8' X 4' Concrete Box in good condition
Average Daily Traffic:
2013 = 100, 2033 = 150
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
RL-2 Surfacing Thickness:
Width:
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Twin 6'
Rise:
4'
Length:
40'
Type:
Twin Conc. Box
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Addition of twin 6' X 4' X 48' precast concrete box culvert sections along side existing Twin 8' X 4'
Concrete Box Structure to increase drainage capacity.
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
30 30
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.1
Project No.:
C40(425)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 50 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
60th Road between Wildwood Drive and U.S. Hwy. No. 30. Section 4, T 10 N, R 10 W.
County mile: 22M
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Gravel and culverts
Average Daily Traffic:
2013 = 387, 2033 = 550
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
RL-1 Surfacing Thickness:
6"
Width:
24'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
5" x 24' Asphalt or 6" X 24' Concrete.
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
225 225
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
1.25 Miles
Project No.:
C40(426)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 51 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C40 - Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
On Stolley Park Road between Shady Bend Road and Gunbarrel Road and along the north line of
Section 25, T11-N-, R-9-W of the 6th P.M., Hall County, NE
Stolley Park Road 29A
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Gravel, culverts and bridge
Average Daily Traffic:
2013 = 146, 2033 = 175
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Other Arterial
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
ROA-3 Surfacing Thickness:
6"
Width:
24.0
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
5" x 24' Asphalt or 6" X 24' Concrete
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
225 225
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
1.0 Miles
Project No.:
C40(427)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 52 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
Rehabilitate timber bridge on Nine Bridge Road just north of Elm Island Road. In the northeast 1/4 of
Secton 29, T-10-N, R-9-W in Hall County, Nebraska.
County Bridge Number 10 1/2 H 9
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Timber bridge on gravel county road.
Average Daily Traffic:
2017 = 15, 2037 = 20
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
RL-1 Surfacing Thickness:
2"
Width:
20'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
22.1
Length:
32
Type:
Rehab Timber Bridge
New Bridge Roadway Width:
'
Length:
'
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Rehabilitate exisitng 32' long by 22.1' clear roadway width timber bridge with new backwall for abutment
number 2. Replace stringers as needed and re-deck as needed.
Bridge built in 1940.
NDOR Structure Number C004023710P
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
20 20
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.1
Project No.:
C40(461)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 53 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
1/4 Mile South of Binfield Road on Wiseman Road on the Hall - Buffalo County Line, Section 18,
Township 9 North, Range 12 West, Hall County, NE
Hall County Bridge No. 50 D 8
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
4' x 12' x 20' Concrete Box Culvert
Average Daily Traffic:
2018 = 60, 2038 = 75
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
Table 2-001.03J Surfacing Thickness:
2"
Width:
20'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
TBD
Length:
TBD
Type:
CMP
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Replace 4' x 12' x 20' CBC w/CMP's Built in 1934.
1/2 Hall Structure No. C004024325
1/2 Buffalo
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
25 25 50
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.1 Mile
Project No.:
C40(467)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 54 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
North of Chapman Road on Quandt Road, between Section 11 and Section 12, Township 12 North,
Range 9 West.
Bridge 4 Y 7
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
3 Span 30' x 70' Precast Concrete Deck Bridge
Average Daily Traffic:
2018 = 85, 2038 = 105
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
Table 2-001.03J Surfacing Thickness:
NA
Width:
NA
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
30
Length:
70
Type:
Replace Panels
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
Rise:
Length:
Type:
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Replace existing concrete precast panels on bridge.
Built 1983
Structure No. C004024520
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
85 85
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.1 Mile
Project No.:
C40(466)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 55 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
Burwick Road between Cedarview Road and Holling Road between Sections 32 & 33, T-10-N, R-11-W
County Bridge No. 34-G-3
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Gravel, steel beam, concrete deck bridge Built 1932
Existing bridge is a steel beam 40' x 15'
Average Daily Traffic:
2018 = 85, 2038 = 105
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
Table 2-001.03J Surfacing Thickness:
2"
Width:
20'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
'
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
TBD
Rise:
TBD
Length:
TBD
Type:
CONCRETE
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Replace Fracture Critical steel girder bridge that is posted 9 ton with a cast in place CBC
Built 1932
NDOR STRUCTURE NO. C004011710
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
115 115
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.2 Mile
Project No.:
C40(434)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 56 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
C-40 Hall County
City:
Village:
Location Description:
Cedarview Road between NE Hwy 11 and Burwick Road between Section 32, T-10-N, R-11-W and
Section 5. T-9-N, R-11-W
County Bridge No. 13-S-3
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
Gravel and transverse joist girder bridge
Average Daily Traffic:
2014 = 35, 2034 = 50
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
Local
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
Table 2-001.03J Surfacing Thickness:
2"
Width:
20'
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
'
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
TBD
Rise:
TBD
Length:
TBD
Type:
CONCRETE
Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
Remove 18' x 45' steel girder bridge built in 1971 and replace with a cast in place CBC
Posted 16 Ton
NDOR STRUCTURE NO. C004003805
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
105 105
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
0.1 Mile
Project No.:
C40(435)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 57 / 136
Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards
Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan
Highway or Street Improvement Project
County:
HALL
City:
Village:
Location Description:
MILE 8A, 8B, & 8C- SOUTH LOCUST STREET, FROM LEPIN ROAD SOUTH TO BARROWS ROAD
AT THE HALL-ADAMS COUNTY LINE.
BETWEEN SECTIONS 33 & 34, SECTIONS 27 & 28, AND SECTIONS 21 & 22, T-9-N, R-9-W
Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge)
GRAVEL-CONVERT TO PAVED ROAD WITH 6" ASPHALTIC CONCRETE.
Average Daily Traffic:
2019 = 155, 2019 = 210
Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map)
RURAL MAJOR COLLECTOR (COUNTY)
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
Design Standard Number:
Surfacing Thickness:
Width:
Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting
Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments ..............................................................
Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing ..............................................................
Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks ..............................................................
Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
New Bridge Roadway Width:
Length:
Type:
Box Culvert Span:
10'
Rise:
9'
Length:
50'
Type:
TRIPE
LE Culvert Diameter:
Length:
Type:
Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending
Other Construction Features:
ESTIMATED COST
(in Thousands)
OPTIONAL
COUNTY CITY STATE FEDERAL OTHER TOTAL
900 900
Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)
3.0
Project No.:
C40(476)
Signature:
Title:
Hall County Engineer
Date:
June 25, 2019
NBCS Form 7, Jul 96
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 58 / 136
Hall County Regional Planning
Commission
Wednesday, June 5, 2019
Regular Meeting
Item F2
Public Hearing - Substandard and Blight Study CRA Area #16
Staff Contact:
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 59 / 136
City of Grand Island, NE
Blight and Substandard Study
Area #16
April 2019
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 60 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • August 2014 Page 1
PPUURRPPOOSSEE OOFF TTHHEE BBLLIIGGHHTT AANNDD SSUUBBSSTTAANNDDAARRDD SSTTUUDDYY
The purpose of completing this Blight and Substandard study is to examine existing conditions
within the city of Grand Island as well as surrounding conditions. This study has been
commissioned by the Community Redevelopment Authority in order to analyze the possibility of
declaring the area as blighted and substandard.
The City of Grand Island, when considering conditions of Blight and Substandard, will be looking
at those issues and definitions provided for in the Nebraska Community Redevelopment Law as
found in Chapter 18, Section 2104 of the Revised Nebraska State Statutes, as follows:
“The governing body of a city, to the greatest extent it deems to be feasible in
carrying out the provisions of Sections 18-2101 to 18-2144, shall afford maximum
opportunity, consistent with sound needs of the city as a whole, to the rehabilitation
or redevelopment of the community redevelopment area by private enterprises. The
governing body of a city shall give consideration to this objective in exercising its
powers under sections 18-2101 to 18-2144, including the formulation of a workable
program, the approval of community redevelopment plans consistent with the
general plan for the development of the city, the exercise of its zoning powers, the
enforcement of other laws, codes, and regulations relating to the use and
occupancy of buildings and improvements, the disposition of any property acquired,
and providing of necessary public improvements”.
The Nebraska Revised Statutes §18-2105 continues by granting authority to the governing body
for formulation of a workable program. The statute reads,
“The governing body of a city or an authority at its direction for the purposes of the
Community Development Law may formulate for the entire municipality a workable
program for utilizing appropriate private and public resources to eliminate or prevent
the development or spread of urban blight, to encourage needed urban
rehabilitation, to provide for the redevelopment of substandard and blighted areas,
or to undertake such of the aforesaid activities or other feasible municipal activities
as may be suitably employed to achieve the objectives of such workable program.
Such workable program may include, without limitation, provision for the prevention
of the spread of blight into areas of the municipality which are free from blight
through diligent enforcement of housing, zoning, and occupancy controls and
standards; the rehabilitation or conservation of substandard and blighted areas or
portions thereof by replanning, removing congestion, providing parks, playgrounds,
and other public improvements by encouraging voluntary rehabilitation and by
compelling the repair and rehabilitation of deteriorated or deteriorating structures;
and the clearance and redevelopment of substandard and blighted areas or
portions thereof.”
Blight and Substandard are defined as the following:
“Substandard areas means an area in which there is a predominance of buildings or
improvements, whether nonresidential or residential in character, which, by reason of
dilapidation, deterioration, age or obsolescence, inadequate provision for
ventilation, light, air, sanitation, or open spaces, high density of population and
overcrowding, or the existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire
and other causes, or any combination of such factors, is conducive to ill health,
transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency, and crime, (which
cannot be remedied through construction of prisons), and is detrimental to the
public health, safety, morals, or welfare;”
“Blighted area means an area, which (a) by reason of the presence of a substantial
number of deteriorated or deteriorating structures, existence of defective or
inadequate street layout, faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility,
or usefulness, insanitary or unsafe conditions, deterioration of site or other
improvements, diversity of ownership, tax or special assessment delinquency
exceeding the fair value of the land, defective or unusual conditions of title,
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 61 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • August 2014 Page 2
improper subdivision or obsolete platting, or the existence of conditions which
endanger life or property by fire and other causes, or any combination of such
factors, substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the community, retards
the provision of housing accommodations, or constitutes an economic or social
liability and is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present
condition and use and (b) in which there is at least one of the following conditions: (i)
Unemployment in the designated area is at least one hundred twenty percent of the
state or national average; (ii) the average age of the residential or commercial units
in the area is at least forty years; (iii) more than half of the plotted and subdivided
property in an area is unimproved land that has been within the city for forty years
and has remained unimproved during that time; (iv) the per capita income of the
area is lower than the average per capita income of the city or village in which the
area is designated; or (v) the area has had either stable or decreasing population
based on the last two decennial censuses. In no event shall a city of the
metropolitan, primary, or first class designate more than thirty-five percent of the city
as blighted, a city of the second class shall not designate an area larger than fifty
percent of the city as blighted, and a shall not designate an area larger than one
hundred percent of the as blighted;”
This Blight and Substandard Study is intended to give the Grand Island Community
Redevelopment Authority, Hall County Regional Planning Commission and Grand Island City
Council the basis for identifying and declaring Blighted and Substandard conditions existing
within the City’s jurisdiction. Through this process, the City and property owner will be attempting
to address economic and/or social liabilities which are harmful to the well-being of the entire
community.
The study area can be seen in Figure 1 of this report. The Redevelopment Plan portion of this
report will contain, in accordance with the law, definite local objectives regarding appropriate
land uses, improved traffic, public transportation, public utilities and other public improvements,
and the proposed land uses and building requirements in the redevelopment area and shall
include:
• The boundaries defining the blighted and substandard areas in question (including existing
uses and conditions of the property within the area), and
• A list of the conditions present which qualify the area as blighted and substandard.
BBLLIIGGHHTT AANNDD SSUUBBSSTTAANNDDAARRDD EELLIIGGIIBBIILLIITTYY SSTTUUDDYY
This study targets a specific area within an established part of the community for evaluation. The
area is indicated in Figure 1 of this report. The existing uses in this area include agricultural,
residential, commercial, and public uses. The portion of the study containing the public uses
contains the Central Nebraska Veterans Home (CNVH) which is slated to be relocated to
Kearney in the coming years. If and when this move takes place, the current site will be vacated
and provides an ideal opportunity for redevelopment in northern Grand Island along the
frontages of Capital Avenue and Nebraska Highway 2.
Some areas within close proximity to the CNVH are currently agricultural lands, some within the
corporate limits and some outside the limits. The thought is these properties may become
developed at the same time the CNVH site gets redeveloped. Therefore, those areas have been
included in the study area; however, those lands outside the corporate limits must be annexed
into the corporate limits prior to the declaration of blight and substandard.
Through the redevelopment process the City of Grand Island can guide future development
and redevelopment throughout the area. The use of the Community Redevelopment Act by the
City of Grand Island is intended to redevelop and improve the area. Using the Community
Redevelopment Act, the City of Grand Island can assist in the elimination of negative conditions
and implement different programs/projects identified for the City.
The following is the description of the designated area within Grand Island.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 62 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • August 2014 Page 3
Study Area
POINT OF BEGINNING IS THE INTERSECTION OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINES OF
BROADWELL AVENUE N AND CAPITAL AVENUE W; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF
CAPITAL AVENUE W TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINES OF CAPITAL AVENUE W AND
HUSTON AVENUE N; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF HUSTON AVENUE N TO THE
CENTERLINE OF STATE STREET W; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF STATE STREET W TO
THE CENTERLINE OF LAFAYETTE AVENUE N; THENCE; NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF
LAFAYETTE AVENUE N TO THE CENTERLINE OF FORREST STREET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID
CENTERLINE OF FORREST STREET TO THE CENTERLINE OF KRUSE AVENUE N; THENCE NORTHERLY
ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF KRUSE AVENUE N TO THE CENTERLINE OF COTTAGE STREET; THENCE
WESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF COTTAGE STREET TO THE CENTERLINE OF HANCOCK
AVENUE; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF HANCOCK AVENUE TO THE CENTERLINE
OF CAPITAL AVENUE W; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF CAPITAL AVENUE W TO
THE SOUTHERLY EXTENDED WEST PROPERTY LINE OF MISCELLANEOUS TRACTS 5-11-9 OTHERWISE
REFERRED TO THE STATE OF NEBRASKA SOLDIERS HOME; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERN
PROPERTY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF A MISCELLANEOUS TRACT 5-11-9 OTHERWISE
REFERRED TO AS THE STATE OF NEBRASKA SOLDIERS HOME (CEMETERY); THENCE WESTERLY ALONG
THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE CEMETERY TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE OF A MISCELLANEOUS TRACT 6-11-9
REFERRED TO AS THE STATE OF NEBRASKA SOLDIERS HOME TO THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF US
HIGHWAY 281; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO THE INTERSECTION
OF THE WESTERN PROPOERTY LINE OF LAND CONTAINING EAGLE SCOUT PARK; THENCE SOUTHERLY
ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE OF EAGLE SCOUT PARK TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
VETERANS BALLFIELD COMPLEX; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE OF SAID
COMPLEX TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER (MOST EASTERLY POINT); THENCE EXTENDING EASTERLY TO
THE CENTERLINE OF BROADWELL AVENUE N; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF
BROADWELL AVENUE N TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
UNIQUE CONDITIONS TO THE STUDY AREA
A portion of this describe area is currently outside the corporate limits of the city. In order for this
specific area to be declared as blighted and substandard, the City Council will need to annex
the property into the corporate limits.
The area is currently owned by the State of Nebraska and is considered part of the Nebraska
Veterans Home property. Currently the ground contains crops but would likely meet the urban
and suburban test. If this property does not become annexed and declared blighted and
substandard, it will be very difficult to declare this area such as a standalone
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 63 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • August 2014 Page 4
Figure 1
Study Area Map
Source: Marvin Planning Consultants 2014
Area currently outside
the Grand Island
corporate limits
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 64 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • August 2014 Page 5
EEXXIISSTTIINNGG LLAANNDD UUSSEESS
The term “Land Use” refers to the developed uses in place within a building or on a specific
parcel of land. The number and type of uses are constantly changing within a community, and
produce a number of impacts that either benefit or detract from the community. Because of
this, the short and long-term success and sustainability of the community is directly contingent
upon available resources utilized in the best manner given the constraints the City faces during
the course of the planning period. Existing patterns of land use are often fixed in older
communities and neighborhoods, while development in newer areas is often reflective of
current development practices.
Existing Land Use Analysis within Study Area
As part of the planning process, a survey was conducted through both in-field observations, as
well as data collection online using the Hall County Assessors website. This survey noted the use
of each parcel of land within the study area. These data from the survey are analyzed in the
following paragraphs.
Table 1 includes the existing land uses for the entire study area. The table contains the total
acres determined per land use from the survey; next is the percentage of those areas compared
to the total developed land; and finally, the third set of data compare the all land uses to the
total area within the Study Area.
The Study Area is predominately residential and undeveloped areas, including an area of
agricultural ground (needing to be annexed). Residential ground made up 59.0% of the
developed area and 20.5% of the total study area. However, vacant/agricultural land made up
65.3% of the total study area. Transportation related uses were 34.9% of the developed area and
12.1% of the total study area.
TABLE 1: EXISTING LAND USE, GRAND ISLAND - 2014
Type of Use Acres Percent of
Developed land
within the Study
Area
Percent of
Study Area
Residential 116.5 59.0%20.5%
Single-family 53.26 27.0%9.4%
Multi-family 63.24 32.0%11.1%
Manufactured Housing 0 0.0%0.0%
Commercial 0 0.0%0.0%
Industrial 0.00 0.0%0.0%
Quasi-Public/Public 11.98 6.1%2.1%
Parks/Recreation 0 0.0%0.0%
Transportation 68.87 34.9%12.1%
Total Developed Land 197.35 100.0%
Vacant/Agriculture 371.74 65.3%
Total Area 569.09 100.0% Source: 2014 Grand Island Blight Study Area 16, Marvin Planning Consultants
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 65 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • August 2014 Page 6
Figure 2
Existing Land Use Map
Source: Marvin Planning Consultants, 2014
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 66 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • August 2014 Page 7
FFIINNDDIINNGGSS OOFF BBLLIIGGHHTT AANNDD SSUUBBSSTTAANNDDAARRDD CCOONNDDIITTIIOONNSS EELLIIGGIIBBIILLIITTYY SSTTUUDDYY
This section of the Eligibility Report examines the conditions found in the study area. The Findings
Section will review the conditions based upon the statutory definitions.
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS
There are a number of conditions that were examined and evaluated in the field and online.
There are a number of conditions that will be reviewed in detail, on the following pages, while
some of the statutory conditions are present, other are not.
Age of Structure
Age of structures can be a contributing factor to the blighted and substandard conditions in an
area. Statutes allow for a predominance of structures that are 40 years of age or older to be a
contributing factor regardless of their condition. The following paragraphs document the
structural age of the structures within the Study Area. Note that the age of structure was
determined from the Appraisal data within the Hall County Assessor’s website data.
Within the study area there is a total of 339 primary structures. After researching the structural
age on the Hall County Assessor’s and Treasurer’s websites, the following breakdown was
determined:
• 254 (74.9%) units were determined to be 40 years of age or older
• 85 (25.1%) units were determined to be less than 40 years in age
The age of the structures would be a direct contributing factor.
Figure 3
Unit Age Map
Source: Marvin Planning Consultants, 2014
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 67 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • August 2014 Page 8
Structural Conditions
Where structural conditions were evaluated, structures were either rated as: Good, Average,
Fair, or badly worn. The data and rating system comes from the Hall County Assessor’s database
and is the same database used to value properties in the area. In addition, our team had to
make some assumptions on the Central Nebraska Veterans Home and Legion/VFW Building
since they are not addressed by the Assessor’s office.
Based upon the data provided to the planning team, the following is the breakdown for
structures in the study area:
• 30 (8.8%) structures rated as good
• 277 (81.7%) structures rated as average
• 31 (9.2%) structures rated as fair
• 1 (0.3%) structure rated as badly worn
Based upon these data, an assumption has been made that average condition and less would
constitute less than desirable conditions due to age and conditions. It is common that that older
a structure gets the more maintenance and upkeep are required in order to maintain a good or
higher condition. Even an average structure will show some signs of deteriorating which in turn
can become a dilapidated structure in the future if it is not addressed over time.
Due to the stated conditions found in the Hall County Assessor’s data, the condition of the
structure is a contributing factor.
Figure 4
Structural Conditions
Source: Marvin Planning Consultants, 2014
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 68 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • August 2014 Page 9
Sidewalk Conditions
The sidewalk conditions were analyzed in the Study Area. The
sidewalks were rated on four categories; adequate,
deteriorating, dilapidating, and missing completely.
Within the study area there is approximately 53,535 lineal feet of
sidewalk possible. After reviewing the conditions in the field, the
following is how the sidewalk conditions breakdown within the
study area:
• 13,738 (25.7%) lineal feet of adequate sidewalk
• 22,832 (42.6%) lineal feet of deteriorating sidewalk
• 16,965 (31.7%) lineal feet of no sidewalk.
• There was no sidewalk deemed to be dilapidated.
Overall, 74.3% of the sidewalks are in either a deteriorating state
or completely missing. Missing sidewalk is as bad as dilapidated
or deteriorating sidewalk since there is no safe place to walk
other than across someone else’s property or in the street. The
safest sidewalks appeared to be along routes that ran north and
south and directly connected into the Senior High School, just
outside the study area. See Figure 5 for the locations of these
sidewalks.
Due to the large amount of deteriorating and missing sidewalk,
the sidewalk conditions would be a direct contributing factor.
Street Conditions
The street conditions were analyzed in the Study Area. The
streets were also rated on four categories; adequate,
deteriorating, dilapidating, and missing completely. The
following is the breakdown for the area.
Within the study area there is approximately 42,562 lineal feet of
street. After reviewing the conditions in the field, the following is
how the street conditions breakdown within the corporate limits:
• 5,795 (13.6%) lineal feet of adequate street
• 25,714 (60.4%) lineal feet of deteriorating street
• 11,053 (26.0%) lineal feet of dirt/gravel/unimproved streets.
• There was no street deemed to be dilapidated.
Overall, 86.4% of the streets are in either a deteriorating state or
were paved with dirt/gravel, thus an obsolete material for an
urban area. See Figure 6 for the locations of these streets.
Due to the large amount of deteriorating and missing street, the
street conditions would be a direct contributing factor.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 69 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • August 2014 Page 10
Figure 5
Sidewalk Conditions
Source: Marvin Planning Consultants, 2014
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 70 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • August 2014 Page 11
Figure 6
Street Conditions
Source: Marvin Planning Consultants, 2014
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 71 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • August 2014 Page 12
Curb and Gutter
Curb and Gutters have a number of direct and indirect roles in
neighborhoods. Their primary functions is to be a barrier that
collects and directs water to be drained away. On a secondary
level, they can help define where the streets start and stop, and
they act as a physical barrier between pedestrian and vehicular
traffic.
Curb and gutter for the Study Area were examined similarily to
streets and sidewalks. The curb and gutter will be graded as
either adequate, deteriorating, dilapidated, or missing. In
addition, curb and gutter will be examined based upon their
location, within the incorporated area or within the county
industrial park.
Within the study area there is approximately 54,408 lineal feet of
curb and gutter possible. After reviewing the conditions in the
field, the following is how the curb and gutter conditions
breakdown within the corporate limits:
• 8,043 (14.8%) lineal feet of adequate curb and gutter
• 27,953 (51.4%) lineal feet of deteriorating curb and gutter
• 18,412 (33.8%) lineal feet of no curb and gutter or rural
section.
• There was no curb and gutter deemed to be dilapidated.
In total, 85.2% of the curb and gutters are in either a
deteriorating state or are missing. See Figure 7 for the locations of
these curb and gutter.
Due to the large amount of deteriorating and missing curb and
gutter, the curb and gutter conditions would be a direct
contributing factor.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 72 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • August 2014 Page 13
Figure 7
Curb and Gutter Conditions
Source: Marvin Planning Consultants, 2014
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 73 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • August 2014 Page 14
Deterioration of site or other improvements
Throughout this Area, there is a large portion of sidewalk that is
either deteriorating or missing. In addition, a large portion of the
curb and gutter has been determined to be either deteriorating
or missing.
Finally, the area has a large amount of deteriorating streets. The
streets have been patched over and over due to large amounts
of cracking that has been occurring in the pavement.
There are numerous apartment complexes within the study area
and nearly all of them have driveways and parking areas that
are deteriorating and in some need of repair. In addition the
parking areas and driveways within the Central Nebraska
Veterans Home and the Legion/VFW have issues with
deteriorating pavement.
Based upon the field analysis, there are sufficient elements
present to meet the definition of deterioration of site and other
improvements in the Study Area.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 74 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • August 2014 Page 15
Figure 8
Deterioration of Site or Other Improvements
Source: Marvin Planning Consultants, 2014
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 75 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • August 2014 Page 16
Dangerous conditions to life or property due to fire or other causes
The conditions within this study area are not the typical “Dangerous conditions to and property
due to fire or other causes” but they are being deemed relevant in this study. Within the study
area there are four major transportation issues that can be dangerous, these are Capital
Avenue, Old Nebraska Highway 2, US Highway 281, and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF)
Railroad mainline. All of these bisect the study area and all are relatively close to one another. In
addition, the proximity in which all of these converge are in a very narrow area which can and
does create congestion and hazardous conditions.
The major thoroughfares create potential hazards regarding the walkability and “bicycle ability”
of the area. The railroad line creates the potential for derailments and potential spills, including
hazardous conditions which can be dangerous to life and/or property.
Based upon the field analysis, there are sufficient elements present to meet the definition of
dangerous conditions within the Study Area.
Figure 9
Dangerous conditions to life or property due to fire or other causes
Source: Marvin
Planning Consultants, 2014
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 76 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • August 2014 Page 17
Improper Platting or Obsolete Platting
The majority of this area was platted, especially south of Capital Avenue, in the late 1800’s and
early 1890’s as the city began to grow. The vast number of the lots, as they are platted today,
will be difficult to redevelop.
Over the years, lots south of Capital Avenue have been allowed to reconfigure, combine
together, or split apart into a fraction of the original layout. Even though they create some issues
with platting, they are not as critical as the following areas:
• The land north of Capital Avenue given to the State of Nebraska for the Central Nebraska
Veterans Home over 100 years ago
• The configuration of land around old Nebraska Highway 2, the BNSF and Broadwell
intersections.
Based upon the review of the plat of the area, there are sufficient elements present to meet the
definition of improper platting or obsolete platting within the Study Area.
Figure 10
Dangerous conditions to life or property due to fire or other causes
Source: Marvin Planning
Consultants, 2014
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 77 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • August 2014 Page 18
Diversity of Ownership
After reviewing the information on the Hall County Assessor’s website, the study area was found
to have 100’s of different property owners. In order for future redevelopment to occur it may
require some of these tracts to get into common ownership.
Based upon the fact, so many individuals, corporations, etc. own property in this area, it is
determined that the high diversity of property ownership could easily be a barrier to
redevelopment.
Combination of factors which are impairing and/or arresting sound growth
Within this study area there are a number of factors that are impairing or arresting sound growth.
A couple of these include:
• The location of the Central Nebraska Veteran’s Home
• The carrying capacity of Capital Avenue
• The BNSF Railroad mainline
• Old Nebraska Highway 2
• The inability to construct grade separated intersections between Broadwell Avenue, old
Nebraska Highway 2 and the BNSF railroad mainline.
• Large tract of undeveloped (agricultural ground) that is surrounded by the corporate limits
and development considered to be urban and suburban in character.
Based upon the review of the area, there are sufficient elements present to meet the definition
of combination of factors which are impairing and/or arresting sound growth within the Study
Area.
BBlliigghhttiinngg SSuummmmaarryy
These conditions are contributing to the blighted conditions of the study area.
Average age of structures is over 40 years of age
o Within the Study Area 74.9% of the structures meet the criteria of 40 years of age or older.
Substantial number of deteriorating structures
o 91.2% of the structures identified within the Study Area, were deemed to be in a state less
than good as defined by the Hall County Assessor’s Office.
Deterioration of site or other improvements
o 74.3% of sidewalk was either in a deteriorated state or missing from properties in the area.
o 26.0% of the public streets and alleys were gravel or dirt.
o 60.4% of the streets in the area were showing signs of deterioration.
o 33.8% of the area had rural section (drainage ditches and no curb and gutter)
o 51.4% of the curb and gutter areas were showing signs of deterioration.
o Several properties in the study area have gravel parking areas, deteriorating parking lots,
and/or deteriorating driveways.
Dangerous conditions to life or property due to fire or other causes
o Major highways and carrying capacity
o BNSF railroad
o Intersection of BNSF, Broadwell Avenue, and old Nebraska Highway 2
Improper Subdivision or obsolete platting
Diversity of ownership
Combination of factors which are impairing and/or arresting sound growth
The other criteria for Blight were not present in the area, these included:
• Unsanitary / Unsafe conditions
• Defective/Inadequate street layouts,
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 78 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • August 2014 Page 19
• Faulty lot layout,
• Defective or unusual condition of title,
• Economic or social liability detrimental to health, safety and welfare,
• Conditions provision of housing accommodations,
• One-half of unimproved property is over 40 years old,
• Inadequate provisions for ventilation, light, air, open spaces or sanitation
These issues were either not present or were limited enough as to have little impact on the
overall condition of the study area.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 79 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • August 2014 Page 20
SSuubbssttaannddaarrdd CCoonnddiittiioonnss
Average age of the residential or commercial units in the area is at least forty years
Age of structures can be a contributing factor to the blighted and substandard conditions in an
area. Statutes allow for a predominance of units that are 40 years of age or older to be a
contributing factor regardless of their condition. Note that the age of structure was determined
from the Appraisal data within the Hall County Assessor’s website data.
Within the study area there is a total of 339 structures. After researching the structural age on the
Hall County Assessor’s and Treasurer’s websites, the following breakdown was determined:
• 254 (74.9%) units were determined to be less than 40 years of age
• 85 (25.1%) units were determined to be 40 years of age or older
There is a predominance of units 40 years of age or older.
SSuubbssttaannddaarrdd SSuummmmaarryy
Nebraska State Statute requires “…an area in which there is a predominance of buildings or
improvements, whether nonresidential or residential in character, which, by reason of
dilapidation, deterioration, age or obsolescence, inadequate provision for ventilation, light, air,
sanitation, or open spaces, high density of population and overcrowding, or the existence of
conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes, or any combination of such
factors, is conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency,
and crime, (which cannot be remedied through construction of prisons), and is detrimental to
the public health, safety, morals, or welfare;”
This Study Area in Grand Island meets the defintion with the average age of the structures being
more than 40 years of age. In addition, the area meets the criteria for the existence of
conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes.
FFIINNDDIINNGGSS FFOORR GGRRAANNDD IISSLLAANNDD BBLLIIGGHHTT SSTTUUDDYY AARREEAA ##1166
Blight Study Area #16 has several items contributing to the Blight and Substandard Conditions.
These conditions include:
Blighted Conditions
• Average age of structures is over 40 years of age
• Substantial number of deteriorating structures
• Deterioration of site or other improvements
• Dangerous conditions to life or property due to fire or other causes
• Improper Subdivision or obsolete platting
• Diversity of ownership
• Combination of factors which are impairing and/or arresting sound growth
Substandard Conditions
• Average age of the structures in the area is at least forty years.
• Existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 80 / 136
1
Agenda Item # 5
PLANNING DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION TO REGIONAL PLANNING
COMMISSION:
May 20, 2019
SUBJECT:CRA Blight Study (Proposed CRA Area 16) C-24-2019GI
PROPOSAL: Attached is a copy of a Substandard and Blight Study as prepared by Marvin
Planning Consultants entitled “Grand Island NE, Blighted and Substandard Study Area 16”.
This area as defined by the study will be referred to as Community Redevelopment Authority
(CRA) Area 16. The study as prepared and submitted indicates that this property could be
considered substandard and blighted. This only includes property that is located within the
municipal limits of Grand Island. The study as presented shows that this property meets the
criteria to be declared blighted and substandard of its own accord. The Planning Commission
recommendation must be forwarded to the Grand Island City Council within 30 days of making
the recommendation.
OVERVIEW
This study area is approximately 569.09 acres of property in northern Grand Island north of
State Street and east of Webb Road including the all of the Central Nebraska Veterans Home
property. (Study Area).
The Statutory authority and direction to the Planning Commission is referenced below to explain
the Planning Commission purpose in reviewing the study:
18-2109.3 Redevelopment plan; preparation; requirements; planning
commission or board; public hearing; notice; governing body; public hearing;
notice.
18-2109. Redevelopment plan; preparation; requirements; planning commission
or board; public hearing; notice; governing body; public hearing; notice.
(1) An authority shall not prepare a redevelopment plan for a redevelopment
project area unless the governing body of the city in which such area is located
has, by resolution adopted after the public hearings required under this section,
declared such area to be a substandard and blighted area in need of
redevelopment.
(2) Prior to making such declaration, the governing body of the city shall
conduct or cause to be conducted a study or an analysis on whether the area is
substandard and blighted and shall submit the question of whether such area is
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 81 / 136
2
substandard and blighted to the planning commission or board of the city for its
review and recommendation. The planning commission or board shall hold a
public hearing on the question after giving notice of the hearing as provided in
section 18-2115.01. Such notice shall include a map of sufficient size to show the
area to be declared substandard and blighted or information on where to find such
map and shall provide information on where to find copies of the substandard and
blighted study or analysis conducted pursuant to this subsection. The planning
commission or board shall submit its written recommendations to the governing
body of the city within thirty days after the public hearing.
(3) Upon receipt of the recommendations of the planning commission or board,
or if no recommendations are received within thirty days after the public hearing
required under subsection (2) of this section, the governing body shall hold a
public hearing on the question of whether the area is substandard and blighted
after giving notice of the hearing as provided in section 18-2115.01. Such notice
shall include a map of sufficient size to show the area to be declared substandard
and blighted or information on where to find such map and shall provide
information on where to find copies of the substandard and blighted study or
analysis conducted pursuant to subsection (2) of this section. At the public
hearing, all interested parties shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to
express their views respecting the proposed declaration. After such hearing, the
governing body of the city may make its declaration.
(4) Copies of each substandard and blighted study or analysis conducted
pursuant to subsection (2) of this section shall be posted on the city’s public web
site or made available for public inspection at a location designated by the city.
~Reissue Revised Statutes of Nebraska
The attached study does not include a redevelopment plan. If this study is approved subsequent
action will be necessary by both the Planning Commission and the City Council prior to any
action involving Tax Increment Financing or the expenditure of tax dollars from the CRA budget
within this area.
It is appropriate for the planning commission in conducting its review and considering its
recommendation regarding the substandard and blighted designation to:
1.review the study,
2.take testimony from interested parties,
3.make findings of fact, and
4.Include those findings of fact as part of its recommendation to Council.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 82 / 136
3
Blighted and Substandard Defined
The terms blighted and substandard have very specific meanings within the context of the
Community Redevelopment Statutes. Those terms as defined by Statute are included below:
Section 18-2103
Terms, defined.
For purposes of the Community Development Law, unless the context otherwise requires:
(3) Blighted area means an area (a) which, by reason of the presence of a substantial
number of deteriorated or deteriorating structures, existence of defective or inadequate street
layout, faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness, insanitary
or unsafe conditions, deterioration of site or other improvements, diversity of ownership, tax
or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land, defective or unusual
conditions of title, improper subdivision or obsolete platting, or the existence of conditions
which endanger life or property by fire and other causes, or any combination of such factors,
substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the community, retards the provision of
housing accommodations, or constitutes an economic or social liability and is detrimental to
the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use and (b) in which
there is at least one of the following conditions: (i) Unemployment in the designated area is
at least one hundred twenty percent of the state or national average; (ii) the average age of
the residential or commercial units in the area is at least forty years; (iii) more than half of
the plotted and subdivided property in an area is unimproved land that has been within the
city for forty years and has remained unimproved during that time; (iv) the per capita income
of the area is lower than the average per capita income of the city or village in which the
area is designated; or (v) the area has had either stable or decreasing population based on
the last two decennial censuses. In no event shall a city of the metropolitan, primary, or first
class designate more than thirty-five percent of the city as blighted, a city of the second class
shall not designate an area larger than fifty percent of the city as blighted, and a village shall
not designate an area larger than one hundred percent of the village as blighted. A
redevelopment project involving a formerly used defense site as authorized under section 18-
2123.01 shall not count towards the percentage limitations contained in this subdivision;
(31) Substandard areas shall mean an area in which there is a predominance of buildings
or improvements, whether nonresidential or residential in character, which, by reason of
dilapidation, deterioration, age or obsolescence, inadequate provision for ventilation, light,
air, sanitation, or open spaces, high density of population and overcrowding, or the existence
of conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes, or any combination of
such factors, is conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile
delinquency, and crime, (which cannot be remedied through construction of prisons), and is
detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare;
~Reissue Revised Statutes of Nebraska
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 83 / 136
4
ANALYSIS-Blight and Substandard Study
The following findings are copied directly from the Study. The analysis of the substandard
and blighted factors is conducted on pages 7 to 20 of the study.
FINDINGS FOR GRAND ISLAND
Study Area 16 has several items contributing to the Blight and Substandard Conditions. These
conditions include:
Blighting Summary
These conditions are contributing to the blighted conditions of the study area.
Criteria under Part A of the Blight Definition
•Substantial number of deteriorating structures
o Within the study are 100.0% of the structures were deemed to be in either average, badly
worn or worn out condition.
•Deterioration of site or other improvements
o There is no public sidewalk in the study area.
o 100.0% of the area is rural section (drainage ditches and no curb and gutter)
o Several properties in the study area have deteriorating parking lots, and/or deteriorating
driveways.
•Improper Subdivision or Obsolete Platting
o Two of the three properties still extend to the northside of Wildwood Drive West and the
roadway is within an easement versus being dedicated right-of-way.
Criteria under Part B of the Blight Definition
•The average age of the residential or commercial units in the area is at least forty years
o 2 (66.7%) buildings or improvements were determined to be 40 years of age or older
o 1 (33.3%) buildings or improvements were determined to be less than 40 years of age
o The average age based upon a cumulative age calculation is 47.0 years.
The other criteria for Blight were not present in the area
•Dangerous conditions to life or property due to fire or other causes
•Diversity of Ownership
•Unsanitary / Unsafe conditions
•Combination of factors which are impairing and/or arresting sound growth
•Defective/Inadequate street layouts,
•Faulty lot layout,
•Defective or unusual condition of title,
•Economic or social liability detrimental to health, safety and welfare,
•Conditions provision of housing accommodations,
•One-half of unimproved property is over 40 years old,
•Inadequate provisions for ventilation, light, air, open spaces or sanitation
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 84 / 136
5
These issues were either not present or were limited enough as to have little impact on the
overall condition of the study area.
SSuubbssttaannddaarrdd SSuummmmaarryy
Nebraska State Statute requires “…an area in which there is a predominance of buildings or
improvements, whether nonresidential or residential in character, which, by reason of
dilapidation, deterioration, age or obsolescence, inadequate provision for ventilation, light, air,
sanitation, or open spaces, high density of population and overcrowding, or the existence of
conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes, or any combination of such
factors, is conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency,
and crime, (which cannot be remedied through construction of prisons), and is detrimental to
the public health, safety, morals, or welfare;”
This Study Area in Grand Island meets the defintion with the average age of the residential and
commercial units being more than 40 years of age. In addition, the area meets the criteria for
the existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes.
FFIINNDDIINNGGSS FFOORR GGRRAANNDD IISSLLAANNDD BBLLIIGGHHTT SSTTUUDDYY AARREEAA ##2299
Blight Study Area #29 has several items contributing to the Blight and Substandard Conditions.
These conditions include:
Blighted Conditions
Criteria under Part A of the Blight Definition
•Substantial number of deteriorating structures
•Deterioration of site or other improvements
•Improper Subdivision or Obsolete Platting
Criteria under Part B of the Blight Definition
•The average age of the residential or commercial units in the area is at least forty years
Substandard Conditions
•Average age of the structures in the area is at least forty years.
RECOMMENDATION:
Blight and Substandard Designation
Planning Commission staff is recommending consideration of the following questions as a
starting point in the analysis of this Study and in making a recommendation on the question of
whether the property in question is blighted and substandard.
Recommend Questions for Planning Commission
•Does this property meet the statutory requirements to be considered blighted and
substandard? (See the prior statutory references.)
•Are the blighted and substandard factors distributed throughout the Redevelopment Area,
so basically good areas are not arbitrarily found to be substandard and blighted simply
because of proximity to areas which are substandard and blighted? Is development of
adjacent property necessary to eliminate blighted and substandard conditions in the area?
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 85 / 136
6
•Is public intervention appropriate and/or necessary for the redevelopment of the area?
•Will a blight declaration increase the likelihood of development/redevelopment in the
near future and is that in the best interest of the City?
•What is the policy of the City toward increasing development and redevelopment in this
area of the City?
Findings of fact must be based on the study and testimony presented including all written
material and staff reports. The recommendation must be based on the declaration, not based
on any proposed uses of the site. All of the testimony, a copy of the study and this memo
along with any other information presented at the hearing should be entered into the record of
the hearing.
If the Regional Planning Commission concludes that the area in question meets the definition
of blighted and substandard and supports such conclusion with findings of fact they should
move to recommend approval of the declaration as blighted and substandard based on the
facts presented and identified at this meeting.
If the Regional Planning Commission concludes that the area in question does not meet the
definition of blighted and substandard and supports such conclusions with findings of fact,
they should move to recommend denial of the declaration as blighted and substandard based
on the facts identified.
___________________ Chad Nabity AICP, Planning Director
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 86 / 136
Resolution Number 2019-09
HALL COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A BLIGHT AND SUBSTANDARD
STUDY BY THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA; AND APPROVAL OF
RELATED ACTIONS
WHEREAS, the Grand Island City Council at its April 23, 2019 meeting, referred the Blight and
Substandard Study for CRA Area 16, commissioned by The Grand Island Community Redevelopment
Authority to the Hall County Regional Planning Commission, (the “Commission”) for review and recommendation
as to its conformity with the general plan for the development of the City of Grand Island, Hall County, Nebraska,
pursuant to the Nebraska Community Development Law, Chapter 18, Article 21, Reissue Revised Statutes of
Nebraska, as amended (the “Act”); and
WHEREAS, the Commission has reviewed said Blight and Substandard Study and confirmed the
following findings:
•This property as presented in the study meets the requirements to be declared substandard,
•This property as presented in the study meets the requirements to be declared blighted,
•The factors are necessary to declare the property blighted and substandard are sufficiently distributed
to impact development across the entire site,
•That development of this property to its full potential is in the best interest of the City of Grand Island
and the entire region,
•That there are projects ready to develop at this site if they can meet the financial goals of the
developers,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HALL COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING
COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Commission hereby recommends approval of the Blight and Substandard Study.
Section 2. All prior resolutions of the Commission in conflict with the terms and provisions of this
resolution are hereby expressly repealed to the extent of such conflicts.
Section 3. This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage as provided by law.
DATED: June 5, 2019.
HALL COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING
COMMISSION
ATTEST: By: ___________________________________
Chair
By: ___________________________________
Secretary
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 87 / 136
Hall County Regional Planning
Commission
Wednesday, June 5, 2019
Regular Meeting
Item F3
Public Hearing - Substandard and Blight Study CRA Area #29
Staff Contact:
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 88 / 136
1
Agenda Item # 5
PLANNING DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION TO REGIONAL PLANNING
COMMISSION:
May 20, 2019
SUBJECT:CRA Blight Study (Proposed CRA Area 29) C-25-2019GI
PROPOSAL: Attached is a copy of a Substandard and Blight Study as prepared by Marvin
Planning Consultants entitled “Grand Island NE, Blighted and Substandard Study Area 16”.
This area as defined by the study will be referred to as Community Redevelopment Authority
(CRA) Area 29. The study as prepared and submitted indicates that this property could be
considered substandard and blighted. This only includes property that is located within the
municipal limits of Grand Island. The study as presented shows that this property meets the
criteria to be declared blighted and substandard of its own accord. The Planning Commission
recommendation must be forwarded to the Grand Island City Council within 30 days of making
the recommendation.
OVERVIEW
This study is approximately 33.18 acres of property in southern Grand Island south of
Wildwood Drive and east of U.S. Highway 281 including the former Lewis Greenscape
property.. (Study Area).
The Statutory authority and direction to the Planning Commission is referenced below to explain
the Planning Commission purpose in reviewing the study:
18-2109.3 Redevelopment plan; preparation; requirements; planning
commission or board; public hearing; notice; governing body; public hearing;
notice.
18-2109. Redevelopment plan; preparation; requirements; planning commission
or board; public hearing; notice; governing body; public hearing; notice.
(1) An authority shall not prepare a redevelopment plan for a redevelopment
project area unless the governing body of the city in which such area is located
has, by resolution adopted after the public hearings required under this section,
declared such area to be a substandard and blighted area in need of
redevelopment.
(2) Prior to making such declaration, the governing body of the city shall
conduct or cause to be conducted a study or an analysis on whether the area is
substandard and blighted and shall submit the question of whether such area is
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 89 / 136
2
substandard and blighted to the planning commission or board of the city for its
review and recommendation. The planning commission or board shall hold a
public hearing on the question after giving notice of the hearing as provided in
section 18-2115.01. Such notice shall include a map of sufficient size to show the
area to be declared substandard and blighted or information on where to find such
map and shall provide information on where to find copies of the substandard and
blighted study or analysis conducted pursuant to this subsection. The planning
commission or board shall submit its written recommendations to the governing
body of the city within thirty days after the public hearing.
(3) Upon receipt of the recommendations of the planning commission or board,
or if no recommendations are received within thirty days after the public hearing
required under subsection (2) of this section, the governing body shall hold a
public hearing on the question of whether the area is substandard and blighted
after giving notice of the hearing as provided in section 18-2115.01. Such notice
shall include a map of sufficient size to show the area to be declared substandard
and blighted or information on where to find such map and shall provide
information on where to find copies of the substandard and blighted study or
analysis conducted pursuant to subsection (2) of this section. At the public
hearing, all interested parties shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to
express their views respecting the proposed declaration. After such hearing, the
governing body of the city may make its declaration.
(4) Copies of each substandard and blighted study or analysis conducted
pursuant to subsection (2) of this section shall be posted on the city’s public web
site or made available for public inspection at a location designated by the city.
~Reissue Revised Statutes of Nebraska
The attached study does not include a redevelopment plan. If this study is approved subsequent
action will be necessary by both the Planning Commission and the City Council prior to any
action involving Tax Increment Financing or the expenditure of tax dollars from the CRA budget
within this area.
It is appropriate for the planning commission in conducting its review and considering its
recommendation regarding the substandard and blighted designation to:
1.review the study,
2.take testimony from interested parties,
3.make findings of fact, and
4.Include those findings of fact as part of its recommendation to Council.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 90 / 136
3
Blighted and Substandard Defined
The terms blighted and substandard have very specific meanings within the context of the
Community Redevelopment Statutes. Those terms as defined by Statute are included below:
Section 18-2103
Terms, defined.
For purposes of the Community Development Law, unless the context otherwise requires:
(3) Blighted area means an area (a) which, by reason of the presence of a substantial
number of deteriorated or deteriorating structures, existence of defective or inadequate street
layout, faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness, insanitary
or unsafe conditions, deterioration of site or other improvements, diversity of ownership, tax
or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land, defective or unusual
conditions of title, improper subdivision or obsolete platting, or the existence of conditions
which endanger life or property by fire and other causes, or any combination of such factors,
substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the community, retards the provision of
housing accommodations, or constitutes an economic or social liability and is detrimental to
the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use and (b) in which
there is at least one of the following conditions: (i) Unemployment in the designated area is
at least one hundred twenty percent of the state or national average; (ii) the average age of
the residential or commercial units in the area is at least forty years; (iii) more than half of
the plotted and subdivided property in an area is unimproved land that has been within the
city for forty years and has remained unimproved during that time; (iv) the per capita income
of the area is lower than the average per capita income of the city or village in which the
area is designated; or (v) the area has had either stable or decreasing population based on
the last two decennial censuses. In no event shall a city of the metropolitan, primary, or first
class designate more than thirty-five percent of the city as blighted, a city of the second class
shall not designate an area larger than fifty percent of the city as blighted, and a village shall
not designate an area larger than one hundred percent of the village as blighted. A
redevelopment project involving a formerly used defense site as authorized under section 18-
2123.01 shall not count towards the percentage limitations contained in this subdivision;
(31) Substandard areas shall mean an area in which there is a predominance of buildings
or improvements, whether nonresidential or residential in character, which, by reason of
dilapidation, deterioration, age or obsolescence, inadequate provision for ventilation, light,
air, sanitation, or open spaces, high density of population and overcrowding, or the existence
of conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes, or any combination of
such factors, is conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile
delinquency, and crime, (which cannot be remedied through construction of prisons), and is
detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare;
~Reissue Revised Statutes of Nebraska
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 91 / 136
4
ANALYSIS-Blight and Substandard Study
The following findings are copied directly from the Study. The analysis of the substandard
and blighted factors is conducted on pages 5 to 16 of the study.
FINDINGS FOR GRAND ISLAND
Study Area 29 has several items contributing to the Blight and Substandard Conditions. These
conditions include:
Blighting Summary
These conditions are contributing to the blighted conditions of the study area.
Criteria under Part A of the Blight Definition
•Substantial number of deteriorating structures
o Within the study are 100.0% of the structures were deemed to be in either average, badly
worn or worn out condition.
•Deterioration of site or other improvements
o There is no public sidewalk in the study area.
o 100.0% of the area is rural section (drainage ditches and no curb and gutter)
o Several properties in the study area have deteriorating parking lots, and/or deteriorating
driveways.
•Improper Subdivision or Obsolete Platting
o Two of the three properties still extend to the northside of Wildwood Drive West and the
roadway is within an easement versus being dedicated right-of-way.
Criteria under Part B of the Blight Definition
•The average age of the residential or commercial units in the area is at least forty years
o 2 (66.7%) buildings or improvements were determined to be 40 years of age or older
o 1 (33.3%) buildings or improvements were determined to be less than 40 years of age
o The average age based upon a cumulative age calculation is 47.0 years.
The other criteria for Blight were not present in the area
•Dangerous conditions to life or property due to fire or other causes
•Diversity of Ownership
•Unsanitary / Unsafe conditions
•Combination of factors which are impairing and/or arresting sound growth
•Defective/Inadequate street layouts,
•Faulty lot layout,
•Defective or unusual condition of title,
•Economic or social liability detrimental to health, safety and welfare,
•Conditions provision of housing accommodations,
•One-half of unimproved property is over 40 years old,
•Inadequate provisions for ventilation, light, air, open spaces or sanitation
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 92 / 136
5
These issues were either not present or were limited enough as to have little impact on the
overall condition of the study area.
SSuubbssttaannddaarrdd SSuummmmaarryy
Nebraska State Statute requires “…an area in which there is a predominance of buildings or
improvements, whether nonresidential or residential in character, which, by reason of
dilapidation, deterioration, age or obsolescence, inadequate provision for ventilation, light, air,
sanitation, or open spaces, high density of population and overcrowding, or the existence of
conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes, or any combination of such
factors, is conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency,
and crime, (which cannot be remedied through construction of prisons), and is detrimental to
the public health, safety, morals, or welfare;”
This Study Area in Grand Island meets the defintion with the average age of the residential and
commercial units being more than 40 years of age. In addition, the area meets the criteria for
the existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes.
FFIINNDDIINNGGSS FFOORR GGRRAANNDD IISSLLAANNDD BBLLIIGGHHTT SSTTUUDDYY AARREEAA ##2299
Blight Study Area #29 has several items contributing to the Blight and Substandard Conditions.
These conditions include:
Blighted Conditions
Criteria under Part A of the Blight Definition
•Substantial number of deteriorating structures
•Deterioration of site or other improvements
•Improper Subdivision or Obsolete Platting
Criteria under Part B of the Blight Definition
•The average age of the residential or commercial units in the area is at least forty years
Substandard Conditions
•Average age of the structures in the area is at least forty years.
RECOMMENDATION:
Blight and Substandard Designation
Planning Commission staff is recommending consideration of the following questions as a
starting point in the analysis of this Study and in making a recommendation on the question of
whether the property in question is blighted and substandard.
Recommend Questions for Planning Commission
•Does this property meet the statutory requirements to be considered blighted and
substandard? (See the prior statutory references.)
•Are the blighted and substandard factors distributed throughout the Redevelopment Area,
so basically good areas are not arbitrarily found to be substandard and blighted simply
because of proximity to areas which are substandard and blighted? Is development of
adjacent property necessary to eliminate blighted and substandard conditions in the area?
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 93 / 136
6
•Is public intervention appropriate and/or necessary for the redevelopment of the area?
•Will a blight declaration increase the likelihood of development/redevelopment in the
near future and is that in the best interest of the City?
•What is the policy of the City toward increasing development and redevelopment in this
area of the City?
Findings of fact must be based on the study and testimony presented including all written
material and staff reports. The recommendation must be based on the declaration, not based
on any proposed uses of the site. All of the testimony, a copy of the study and this memo
along with any other information presented at the hearing should be entered into the record of
the hearing.
If the Regional Planning Commission concludes that the area in question meets the definition
of blighted and substandard and supports such conclusion with findings of fact they should
move to recommend approval of the declaration as blighted and substandard based on the
facts presented and identified at this meeting.
If the Regional Planning Commission concludes that the area in question does not meet the
definition of blighted and substandard and supports such conclusions with findings of fact,
they should move to recommend denial of the declaration as blighted and substandard based
on the facts identified.
___________________ Chad Nabity AICP, Planning Director
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 94 / 136
City of Grand Island, NE
Blight and Substandard Study
Area #29
March 2019
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 95 / 136
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 96 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • March 2019 Page 1
PPUURRPPOOSSEE OOFF TTHHEE BBLLIIGGHHTT AANNDD SSUUBBSSTTAANNDDAARRDD SSTTUUDDYY
The purpose of completing this Blight and Substandard study is to examine existing conditions
within a specific part of Grand Island. Station 31, LLC commissioned the study to analyze the
possibility of declaring the area as blighted and substandard.
The City of Grand Island, when considering conditions of Blight and Substandard, look at those
issues and definitions provided for in the Nebraska Community Redevelopment Law as found in
Chapter 18, Section 2104 of the Revised Nebraska State Statutes, as follows:
“The governing body of a city, to the greatest extent it deems to be feasible in
carrying out the provisions of the Community Development Law, shall afford
maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the city as a whole, to the
rehabilitation or redevelopment of the community redevelopment area by private
enterprises. The governing body of a city shall give consideration to this objective in
exercising its powers under the Community Development Law, including the
formulation of a workable program, the approval of community redevelopment
plans consistent with the general plan for the development of the city, the exercise
of its zoning powers, the enforcement of other laws, codes, and regulations, relating
to the use of land and the use and occupancy of buildings and improvements, the
disposition of any property acquired, and the providing of necessary public
improvements.”
The Nebraska Revised Statutes §18-2105 continues by granting authority to the governing body
for the formulation of a workable program; disaster assistance; effect. The statute reads,
“The governing body of a city or an authority at its direction for the purposes of the
Community Development Law may formulate for the entire municipality a workable
program for utilizing appropriate private and public resources to eliminate or prevent
the development or spread of urban blight, to encourage needed urban
rehabilitation, to provide for the redevelopment of substandard and blighted areas,
or to undertake such of the aforesaid activities or other feasible municipal activities
as may be suitably employed to achieve the objectives of such workable program.
Such workable program may include, without limitation, provision for the prevention
of the spread of blight into areas of the municipality which are free from blight
through diligent enforcement of housing, zoning, and occupancy controls and
standards; the rehabilitation or conservation of substandard and blighted areas or
portions thereof by replanning, removing congestion, providing parks, playgrounds,
and other public improvements by encouraging voluntary rehabilitation and by
compelling the repair and rehabilitation of deteriorated or deteriorating structures;
and the clearance and redevelopment of substandard and blighted areas or
portions thereof.”
“Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Community Development Law, where
the local governing body certifies that an area is in need of redevelopment or
rehabilitation as a result of flood, fire, hurricane, earthquake, storm, or other
catastrophe respecting which the Governor of the state has certified the need for
disaster assistance under federal law, the local governing body may approve a
redevelopment plan and a redevelopment project with respect to such area without
regard to the provisions of the Community Development Law requiring a general
plan for the municipality and notice and public hearing or findings other than herein
set forth.”
Based on the Nebraska Revised Statutes §18-2103 the following definitions shall apply:
“Blighted area means an area (a) which, by reason of the presence of a substantial
number of deteriorated or deteriorating structures, existence of defective or
inadequate street layout, faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility,
or usefulness, insanitary or unsafe conditions, deterioration of site or other
improvements, diversity of ownership, tax or special assessment delinquency
exceeding the fair value of the land, defective or unusual conditions of title,
improper subdivision or obsolete platting, or the existence of conditions which
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 97 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • March 2019 Page 2
endanger life or property by fire and other causes, or any combination of such
factors, substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the community, retards
the provision of housing accommodations, or constitutes an economic or social
liability and is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present
condition and use and (b) in which there is at least one of the following conditions: (i)
Unemployment in the designated area is at least one hundred twenty percent of the
state or national average; (ii) the average age of the residential or commercial units
in the area is at least forty years; (iii) more than half of the plotted and subdivided
property in an area is unimproved land that has been within the city for forty years
and has remained unimproved during that time; (iv) the per capita income of the
area is lower than the average per capita income of the city or village in which the
area is designated; or (v) the area has had either stable or decreasing population
based on the last two decennial censuses. In no event shall a city of the
metropolitan, primary, or first class designate more than thirty-five percent of the city
as blighted, a city of the second class shall not designate an area larger than fifty
percent of the city as blighted, and a village shall not designate an area larger than
one hundred percent of the village as blighted. A redevelopment project involving a
formerly used defense site as authorized under section 18-2123.01 shall not count
towards the percentage limitations contained in this subdivision;”
“Extremely blighted area means a substandard and blighted area in which: (a) The
average rate of unemployment in the area during the period covered by the most
recent federal decennial census is at least two hundred percent of the average rate
of unemployment in the state during the same period; and (b) the average poverty
rate in the area exceeds twenty percent for the total federal census tract or tracts or
federal census block group or block groups in the area;”
“Substandard area means an area in which there is a predominance of buildings or
improvements, whether nonresidential or residential in character, which, by reason of
dilapidation, deterioration, age or obsolescence, inadequate provision for
ventilation, light, air, sanitation, or open spaces, high density of population and
overcrowding, or the existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire
and other causes, or any combination of such factors, is conducive to ill health,
transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency, and crime, (which
cannot be remedied through construction of prisons), and is detrimental to the
public health, safety, morals, or welfare; and”
“Workforce housing means:
(a) Housing that meets the needs of today's working families;
(b) Housing that is attractive to new residents considering relocation to a rural community;
(c) Owner-occupied housing units that cost not more than two hundred seventy-five
thousand dollars to construct or rental housing units that cost not more than two
hundred thousand dollars per unit to construct. For purposes of this subdivision (c),
housing unit costs shall be updated annually by the Department of Economic
Development based upon the most recent increase or decrease in the Producer Price
Index for all commodities, published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau
of Labor Statistics;
(d) Owner-occupied and rental housing units for which the cost to substantially
rehabilitate exceeds fifty percent of a unit's assessed value; and
(e) Upper-story housing.”
This Blight and Substandard Study is Blighted and Substandard Area 28. The Study is intended to
give the Grand Island Community Redevelopment Authority, Hall County Regional Planning
Commission and Grand Island City Council the basis for identifying and declaring Blighted and
Substandard conditions are existing within the City’s jurisdiction and as allowed under Chapter
18. Through this process, the City and property owners will attempt to address economic and/or
social liabilities which are harmful to the well-being of the entire community.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 98 / 136
£¤281
W Wildwood DriveJuregen RdCITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA
AREA 29 BLIGHT STUDYSTUDY AREA MAP
PROJECTION: NE State Plane (Ft.)DATUM: NAD 83DATE: 02.18.2019
0 150 30075Feet
1 " = 150 feet
¯
LEGEND
Blight Study Area
FIGURE 1
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 99 / 136
£¤281
W Wildwood DriveJuregen RdCITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKAAREA 29 BLIGHT STUDYEXISTING LAND USE MAP
PROJECTION: NE State Plane (Ft.)DATUM: NAD 83DATE: 02.18.2019
0 150 30075Feet
1 " = 150 feet
¯
LEGEND
FIGURE 2
Existing Land Use
Agricultural
Single Family Residential
Commercial
Vacant
Transportation
Blight Study Area
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 100 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • March 2019 Page 5
Figure 1 shows the study area of this report. A Redevelopment Plan to be submitted in the future
containing, by law, definite local objectives regarding appropriate land uses, improved traffic,
public transportation, public utilities, and other public improvements, and the proposed land
uses and building requirements in the redevelopment area and shall include:
• The boundaries defining the blighted and substandard areas in question (including existing
uses and conditions of the property within the area), and
• A list of the conditions present, which qualify the area as blighted and substandard.
Through the redevelopment process, the City of Grand Island can guide future development
and redevelopment throughout the area. The use of the Community Redevelopment Act by the
City of Grand Island is intended to redevelop and improve the area. Using the Community
Redevelopment Act, the City of Grand Island can assist in the elimination of negative conditions
and implement different programs/projects identified for the City.
The study area can be seen in Figure 1 of this report. The Redevelopment Plan portion of this
report will contain, in accordance with the law, definite local objectives regarding appropriate
land uses, improved traffic, public transportation, public utilities and other public improvements,
and the proposed land uses and building requirements in the redevelopment area and shall
include:
• The boundaries defining the blighted and substandard areas in question (including existing
uses and conditions of the property within the area), and
• A list of the conditions present, which qualify the area as blighted and substandard.
BBLLIIGGHHTT AANNDD SSUUBBSSTTAANNDDAARRDD EELLIIGGIIBBIILLIITTYY SSTTUUDDYY
This study targets a specific area within an established part of the community for evaluation. The
area is indicated in Figure 1 of this report. The existing uses in this area include agricultural,
residential, and commercial uses. The study area is bounded on the west by US Highway 281.
Through the redevelopment process the developer and City of Grand Island can guide future
development and redevelopment throughout the area. The use of the Community
Redevelopment Act by the City of Grand Island is intended to redevelop and improve the area.
Using the Community Redevelopment Act, the City of Grand Island can assist in the elimination
of negative conditions and implement different programs/projects identified for the City.
The following is the description of the designated area within Grand Island.
Study Area
Entire NW1/4 NW1/4 of 8-10-9 excluding the tract referred to as Washington TWP PT NW 1/4 NW
1/4 327' X 539' 8-10-9 4.05 AC and 2.27 AC dedicated to highway right-of-way; plus, the
corresponding right-of-way along Wildwood Drive West.
EEXXIISSTTIINNGG LLAANNDD UUSSEESS
The term “Land Use” refers to the developed uses in place within a building or on a specific
parcel of land. The number and type of uses are constantly changing within a community and
produce a number of impacts that either benefit or detract from the community. Because of
this, the short and long-term success and sustainability of the community is directly contingent
upon available resources utilized in the best manner given the constraints the City faces during
the course of the planning period. Existing patterns of land use are often fixed in older
communities and neighborhoods, while development in newer areas is often reflective of
current development practices.
Existing Land Use Analysis within Study Area
As part of the planning process, a survey was conducted through both in-field observations, as
well as data collection online using the Hall County Assessors website. This survey noted the use
of each parcel of land within the study area. These data from the survey are analyzed in the
following paragraphs.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 101 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • March 2019 Page 6
Table 1 includes the existing land uses for the entire study area. The table contains the total
acres determined per land use from the survey; next is the percentage of those areas compared
to the total developed land; and finally, the third set of data compare the all land uses to the
total area within the Study Area.
The Study Area is predominately undeveloped, including agricultural ground (needing to be
annexed). Residential ground made up 21.0% of the developed area and 3.2% of the total study
area. However, vacant/agricultural land made up 85.0% of the total study area. Transportation
related uses were 16.2% of the developed area and 2.4% of the total study area.
TABLE 1: EXISTING LAND USE, GRAND ISLAND - 2019
Type of Use Acres Percent of
Developed land
within the Study
Area
Percent of
Study Area
Residential 1.05 21.0%3.2%
Single-family 1.05 21.0%3.2%
Multi-family 0 0.0%0.0%
Manufactured Housing 0 0.0%0.0%
Commercial 3.13 62.7%9.4%
Industrial 0.00 0.0%0.0%
Quasi-Public/Public 0 0.0%0.0%
Parks/Recreation 0 0.0%0.0%
Transportation 0.81 16.2%2.4%
Total Developed Land 4.99 100.0%
Vacant/Agriculture 28.19 85.0%
Total Area 33.18 100.0% Source: 2019 Grand Island Blight Study Area 29, Marvin Planning Consultants
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 102 / 136
281
W Wildwood DriveJuregen RdCITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKAAREA 29 BLIGHT STUDYSTRUCTURECONDITIONS MAP
PROJECTION: NE State Plane (Ft.)DATUM: NAD 83DATE: 03.11.2019
0 150 30075Feet
1 " = 150 feet
LEGEND
FIGURE 3
Blight Study Area
Structure Condition
Average
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 103 / 136
CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA
AREA 29 BLIGHT STUDYSIDEWALK CONDITION MAP
PROJECTION: NE State Plane (Ft.)DATUM: NAD 83DATE: 03.11.2019
0 150 30075Feet
1 " = 150 feet
LEGEND
FIGURE 4
Sidewalk Conditions
Missing
Blight Study Area
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 104 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • March 2019 Page 9
FFIINNDDIINNGGSS OOFF BBLLIIGGHHTT AANNDD SSUUBBSSTTAANNDDAARRDD CCOONNDDIITTIIOONNSS EELLIIGGIIBBIILLIITTYY SSTTUUDDYY
This section of the Eligibility Report examines the conditions found in the study area. The Findings
Section will review the conditions based upon the statutory definitions.
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS
There are a number of conditions that were examined and evaluated in the field and online.
There are a number of conditions that will be reviewed in detail, on the following pages, while
some of the statutory conditions are present, others are not.
Structural Conditions
Where structural conditions were evaluated, structures were either rated as: Good, Average,
Fair, or badly worn. The data and rating system come from the Hall County Assessor’s database
and is the same database used to value properties in the area. There is a total of three structures
located in the study area.
Based upon the data, the following is the breakdown for structures in the study area:
• 0 (0.0%) structures rated as good
• 3 (100.0%) structures rated as average
• 0 (0.0%) structure rated as badly worn
• 0 (0.0%)
Based upon these data, an assumption
has been made that average condition
and less would constitute less than
desirable conditions due to age and
conditions. It is common that that older a
structure gets the more maintenance and
upkeep are required in order to maintain
a good or higher condition. Even an
average structure will show some signs of
deteriorating which in turn can become a
dilapidated structure in the future if it is
not addressed over time.
Due to the stated conditions found in the
Hall County Assessor’s data, the condition
of the structure is a contributing factor.
Sidewalk Conditions
The sidewalk conditions were analyzed in
the Study Area. The sidewalks are rated
on four categories; adequate,
deteriorating, dilapidating, and missing completely.
Within the study area there is approximately 1,790 lineal feet of sidewalk possible along
Wildwood Drive West. After reviewing the conditions in the field, the following is how the sidewalk
conditions breakdown within the study area:
• 0 (0.0%) lineal feet of good sidewalk
• 0 (0.0%) lineal feet of adequate sidewalk
• 0 (0.0%) lineal feet of deteriorating sidewalk
• 1,790 (100%) lineal feet of no sidewalk.
Overall, there is no sidewalk in the study area; plus, sidewalk to is not anywhere within the
surrounding area.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 105 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • March 2019 Page 10
Due to the large amount of deteriorating and missing sidewalk, the sidewalk conditions would
be a direct contributing factor.
Curb and Gutter
Curb and Gutters have a number of direct and indirect roles in neighborhoods. Their primary
functions is to be a barrier to collect and direct water to be drained away. On a secondary
level, they can help define where the streets start and stop, and they act as a physical barrier
between pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
Curb and gutter for the Study Area were examined similarily to sidewalks. Curb and gutter are
graded as either adequate, deteriorating, dilapidated, or missing.
Within the study area there is approximately 1,790 lineal feet of curb and gutter possible. After
reviewing the conditions in the field, no curb and gutter was found. The drainage system in
place is referred to rural section. Rural section is considered adequate in some rural applications
but not typically in more urban settings.
• 0 (0.0%) lineal feet of good curb and gutter
• 0 (0.0%) lineal feet of adequate curb and gutter
• 0 (0.0%) lineal feet of deteriorating curb and gutter
• 1,790 (100.0%) lineal feet of no curb and gutter or rural section.
In total, 100.0% of drainage was rural section and there is no curb and gutters present.
Due to the large amount of rural section drainage and a lack of curb and gutter, this would be a
direct contributing factor.
Improper Platting or Obsolete Platting
The area has actually had minimal platting in the past. Two of the three tracts, the residential
tract and the larger agricultural tract do not have right-of-way platted along Wildwood Drive
West. Therefore, only ½ of the required right-of-way is present along the north edge of the study
area.
Figure 5
Improper Platting or Obsolete Platting
Source: Marvin Planning Consultants, 2019
Based upon the review of the plat of the area, there are sufficient elements present to meet the
definition of improper platting or obsolete platting within the Study Area.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 106 / 136
CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKAAREA 29 BLIGHT STUDYCURB & GUTTERCONDITION MAP
PROJECTION: NE State Plane (Ft.)DATUM: NAD 83DATE: 03.11.2019
0 150 30075Feet
1 " = 150 feet
LEGEND
FIGURE 6
Curb & Gutter Conditions
Missing
Blight Study Area
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 107 / 136
281
W Wildwood DriveJuregen RdCITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKAAREA 29 BLIGHT STUDYSTRUCTURE AGE MAP
PROJECTION: NE State Plane (Ft.)DATUM: NAD 83DATE: 03.11.2019
0 150 30075Feet
1 " = 150 feet
LEGEND
FIGURE 7
Blight Study Area
Structure Age
Less than 40 Years
40 Years or Older
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 108 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • March 2019 Page 13
TABLE 2: AVERAGE STRUCTURAL AGE, BY METHOD - 2019
Year Built
Number of
Structures Age Cumulative Age
1950 1 68 68
1972 1 47 115
1993 1 26 141
Totals 3 141 141
Average Age/Structure 47.0 years
Source: Hall County Assessor’s Office/MPC 2019
Age of Structure
Age of structures can be a contributing factor to the blighted and substandard conditions in an
area. Statutes allow for a predominance of structures 40 years of age or older to be a
contributing factor regardless of their condition. The following paragraphs document the
structural age of the structures within the Study Area. Note the age of structure was determined
from the Appraisal data within the Hall County Assessor’s website data. Table 2 indicates the
cumulative approach to average age. Based upon Table 2, there are three primary structures
which have a cumulative age of 141 years, or an average of 47.0 years.
Within the study area there is a total of three primary structures. After researching the structural
age on the Hall County Assessor’s and Treasurer’s websites, the following breakdown was
determined:
• 2 (66.7%) units were determined to be 40 years of age or older
• 1(33.3%) units were determined to be less than 40 years in age
The age of the structures would be a direct contributing factor.
Criteria under Part A of the Blight Definition
• Substantial number of deteriorating structures
o Within the study are 100.0% of the structures were deemed to be in either average, badly
worn or worn out condition.
• Deterioration of site or other improvements
o There is no public sidewalk in the study area.
o 100.0% of the area is rural section (drainage ditches and no curb and gutter)
o Several properties in the study area have deteriorating parking lots, and/or deteriorating
driveways.
• Improper Subdivision or Obsolete Platting
o Two of the three properties still extend to the northside of Wildwood Drive West and the
roadway is within an easement versus being dedicated right-of-way.
Criteria under Part B of the Blight Definition
• The average age of the residential or commercial units in the area is at least forty years
o 2 (66.7%) buildings or improvements were determined to be 40 years of age or older
o 1 (33.3%) buildings or improvements were determined to be less than 40 years of age
o The average age based upon a cumulative age calculation is 47.0 years.
The other criteria for Blight were not present in the area
• Dangerous conditions to life or property due to fire or other causes
• Diversity of Ownership
• Unsanitary / Unsafe conditions
• Combination of factors which are impairing and/or arresting sound growth
• Defective/Inadequate street layouts,
• Faulty lot layout,
• Defective or unusual condition of title,
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 109 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • March 2019 Page 14
• Economic or social liability detrimental to health, safety and welfare,
• Conditions provision of housing accommodations,
• One-half of unimproved property is over 40 years old,
• Inadequate provisions for ventilation, light, air, open spaces or sanitation
These issues were either not present or were limited enough as to have little impact on the
overall condition of the study area.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 110 / 136
Blight and Substandard Study
City of Grand Island, Nebraska • March 2019 Page 15
SSuubbssttaannddaarrdd CCoonnddiittiioonnss
Average age of the residential or commercial units in the area is at least forty years
Average age of residential and commercial units can be a contributing factor to the
substandard conditions in an area. Statutes allow for a predominance of structures 40 years of
age or older to be a contributing factor regardless of their condition. The following paragraphs
document the average age of residential and commercial units within the Study Area. Note the
age of structure was determined from the Appraisal data within the Hall County Assessor’s
website data. Table 3 indicates the cumulative approach to average age. Based upon Table 3,
there are three primary structures which have a cumulative age of 141 years, or an average of
47.0 years.
TABLE 3: AVERAGE STRUCTURAL AGE, BY METHOD - 2019
Year Built
Number of
Structures Age Cumulative Age
1950 1 68 68
1972 1 47 115
1993 1 16 131
Totals 3 141 141
Average Age/Structure 47.0 years
Source: Hall County Assessor’s Office/MPC 2019
Within the study area there is a total of three primary structures. After researching the structural
age on the Hall County Assessor’s and Treasurer’s websites, the following breakdown was
determined:
• 2 (66.7%) units were determined to be 40 years of age or older
• 1(33.3%) units were determined to be less than 40 years in age
The age of the structures would be a direct contributing factor.
SSuubbssttaannddaarrdd SSuummmmaarryy
Nebraska State Statute requires “…an area in which there is a predominance of buildings or
improvements, whether nonresidential or residential in character, which, by reason of
dilapidation, deterioration, age or obsolescence, inadequate provision for ventilation, light, air,
sanitation, or open spaces, high density of population and overcrowding, or the existence of
conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes, or any combination of such
factors, is conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency,
and crime, (which cannot be remedied through construction of prisons), and is detrimental to
the public health, safety, morals, or welfare;”
This Study Area in Grand Island meets the defintion with the average age of the residential and
commercial units being more than 40 years of age. In addition, the area meets the criteria for
the existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes.
FFIINNDDIINNGGSS FFOORR GGRRAANNDD IISSLLAANNDD BBLLIIGGHHTT SSTTUUDDYY AARREEAA ##2299
Blight Study Area #29 has several items contributing to the Blight and Substandard Conditions.
These conditions include:
Blighted Conditions
Criteria under Part A of the Blight Definition
• Substantial number of deteriorating structures
• Deterioration of site or other improvements
• Improper Subdivision or Obsolete Platting
Criteria under Part B of the Blight Definition
• The average age of the residential or commercial units in the area is at least forty years
Substandard Conditions
• Average age of the structures in the area is at least forty years.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 111 / 136
Resolution Number 2019-10
HALL COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A BLIGHT AND SUBSTANDARD
STUDY BY THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA; AND APPROVAL OF
RELATED ACTIONS
WHEREAS, the Grand Island City Council at its April 23, 2019 meeting, referred the Blight and
Substandard Study for CRA Area 29, commissioned by Station 31 LLC to the Hall County Regional Planning
Commission, (the “Commission”) for review and recommendation as to its conformity with the general plan for the
development of the City of Grand Island, Hall County, Nebraska, pursuant to the Nebraska Community Development
Law, Chapter 18, Article 21, Reissue Revised Statutes of Nebraska, as amended (the “Act”); and
WHEREAS, the Commission has reviewed said Blight and Substandard Study and confirmed the
following findings:
•This property as presented in the study meets the requirements to be declared substandard,
•This property as presented in the study meets the requirements to be declared blighted,
•The factors are necessary to declare the property blighted and substandard are sufficiently distributed
to impact development across the entire site,
•That development of this property to its full potential is in the best interest of the City of Grand Island
and the entire region,
•That there are projects ready to develop at this site if they can meet the financial goals of the
developers,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HALL COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING
COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Commission hereby recommends approval of the Blight and Substandard Study.
Section 2. All prior resolutions of the Commission in conflict with the terms and provisions of this
resolution are hereby expressly repealed to the extent of such conflicts.
Section 3. This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage as provided by law.
DATED: June 5, 2019.
HALL COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING
COMMISSION
ATTEST: By: ___________________________________
Chair
By: ___________________________________
Secretary
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 112 / 136
Hall County Regional Planning
Commission
Wednesday, June 5, 2019
Regular Meeting
Item F4
Public Hearing - Text Amendment - Grand Island
Staff Contact:
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 113 / 136
Agenda Item # 7
PLANNING DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION TO REGIONAL PLANNING
COMMISSION:
May 21, 2019
SUBJECT:
Concerning proposed amendments to Section 36-70 (B-3) Heavy Business
Zone relative to the required setbacks Section 36-102 Landscaping
Requirements relative to the R-3SL Medium Density Small Lot Zone, B-3
Heavy Business Zone and additions and enlargements of existing
improvements in any zoning district. (C-26-2019GI)
PROPOSAL:
The Railside Business Improvement District board has requested that the
Planning Commission and City Council consider changes to the B3 zoning
district setbacks. Their proposal is to reduce the front and street yard setbacks
to 0 feet allowing for development at the property line in a manner consistent with
the traditional building setbacks for downtown Grand Island. This will require
changes to the landscaping regulations that require a setback in the B3 zoning
district to allow for landscaping. Along with these changes requested by the
Railside Board, staff is suggesting changes to the landscaping regulations that
would add the R-3SL Medium Density Small Lot residential zone to the
landscaping regulations. The final proposed change would update the
requirements for additional landscaping when a property owner is making
minimal expansions to the parking or building area on their property.
OVERVIEW:
The B3 setbacks were increase from 0 feet to 10 feet to become consistent with
the landscaping regulations with the adoption of the zoning regulations in 2004.
Development of some buildings in the Downtown area has shown that it may be
beneficial to the look and feel of downtown to allow development that is more
traditional.
When the R3-SL Zoning district was added to the regulations there were no
changes made to the landscaping sections. The proposed changes would treat
the R-3SL district the same as the R3 district.
In 2018 the Grand Island Board of Adjustment met and granted a variance
allowing a business on 2nd Street to install an addition to the their hard surfaced
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 114 / 136
parking without landscaping the area of the addition. The Board of Adjustment
found that the additional landscaping would not impact the look of the area and
that not placing landscaping once the addition was completed allowed for it to be
consistent with the existing development on the property. Based on that decision
staff is suggesting that in cases where the addition to the building or hard
surfaced parking is equal to or less than 25% of the street frontage that the
regulations be waived. In many cases, the improvements, if required are not
maintained by the owners, which in return diminishes the aesthetics of the
property and the surrounding area.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Regional Planning Commission recommend that the Grand Island
City Council approve the changes to the Grand Island Zoning Ordinance as
presented.
___________________ Chad Nabity AICP, Planning Director
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 115 / 136
§36-70. (B-3) Heavy Business Zone
Intent: The intent of this zoning district is to provide for the multiple uses within the central business
district. Residential uses are permitted at the density of the (RO) Residential Office Zone.
(A) Permitted Principal Uses: The following principal uses are permitted in the (B-3) Heavy Business
Zoning District.
(1) Agencies as found in the Zoning Matrix [Attachment A hereto]
(2) Boarding and lodging houses, fraternity and sorority houses
(3) Churches, synagogues, chapels, and similar places of religious worship and instruction of a quiet
nature
(4) Colleges offering courses of general instruction, including convents, monasteries, dormitories, and
other related living structures when located on the same site as the college
(5) Country clubs
(6) Dwelling units
(7) Elderly Home, Assisted Living
(8) Group Care Home with less than eight (8) individuals
(9) Hospitals, nursing homes, convalescent or rest homes
(10) Hotel and motel uses
(11) Mortuaries, funeral homes, and funeral chapels
(12) Nonprofit community buildings and social welfare establishments
(13) Office and office buildings for professional and personal services as found in the Zoning Matrix
[Attachment A hereto]
(14) Parking Lots
(15) Preschools, nursery schools, day care centers, children's homes, and similar facilities
(16) Public parks and recreational areas
(17) Public, parochial and private schools having a curriculum equivalent to an elementary or higher
educational level
(18) Public and quasi-public buildings for cultural use
(19) Radio and television stations (no antennae), private clubs and meeting halls
(20) Railway right-of-way but not including railway yards or facilities
(21) Retail activities of a prescriptive service provided it is limited to being secondary to said use.
Retail space is limited to 25% of the total floor area
(22) Stores and shops that conduct retail business, provided, all activities and display goods are carried
on within an enclosed building except that green plants and shrubs may be displayed in the open, as
per the Zoning Matrix [Attachment A hereto]
(23) Truck, bush and tree farming, provided, there is no display or sale at retail of such products on the
premises
(24) Utility substations necessary to the functioning of the utility, but not including general business
offices, maintenance facilities and other general system facilities, when located according to the yard
space rules set forth in this section for dwellings and having a landscaped or masonry barrier on all
sides. Buildings shall be of such exterior design as to harmonize with nearby properties
(25) Vocational or trade schools, business colleges, art and music schools and conservatories, and
other similar uses
(26) Other uses as indicated in the Zoning Matrix [Attachment A hereto]
(B) Conditional Uses: The following uses are subject to any conditions listed in this chapter and are subject
to other conditions relating to the placement of said use on a specific tract of ground in the (B-3) Heavy
Business Zoning District as approved by City Council.
(1) Manufacture, fabrication or assembly uses incidental to wholesale or retail sales wherein not more
than 20% of the floor area is so used
(2) Outdoor sales and rental lots for new or used automobiles, boats, motor vehicles, trailers,
manufactured homes, farm and construction machinery
(3) Stores and shops for the conduct of wholesale business, including sale of used merchandise.
(4) Towers
(5) Automobile body repair; subject to the following minimum standards:
No storage of parts or unlicensed vehicles outside of an enclosed building.
The facility shall meet or exceed all building and fire code requirements.
(6) Other uses as indicated in the Zoning Matrix [Attachment A hereto]
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 116 / 136
(C) Permitted Accessory Uses:
(1) Buildings and uses accessory to the permitted principal use.
(D) Space Limitations:
Uses Minimum Setbacks
A B C D E
Minimum
Parcel
Area (feet)
Minimum
Lot Width
(feet)
Front
Yard
(feet)
Rear
Yard
(feet)
Side
Yard
(feet)
Street
Side
Yard
(feet)
Maximum
Ground
Coverage
Maximum
Building
Height (feet)
Permitted Uses 3,000 30 10 01 02 10 100%
Conditional
Uses 3,000 30 10 01 02 10 100%
1 No rear yard setback is required if bounded by an alley, otherwise a setback of 10 feet is required.2 No side yard setback is required, but if provided, not less than 5 feet or unless adjacent to a parcel whose zone
requires a side yard setback, then 5 feet.
(E) Miscellaneous Provisions:
(1) Supplementary regulations shall be complied with as defined herein.
(2) Only one principal building shall be permitted on one zoning lot except as otherwise provided
Amended by Ordinance No. 8947, effective 1-5-2005
Amended by Ordnance No. 9166, effective 5-13-2008
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 117 / 136
§36-102. Landscaping Requirements
(A) Purpose: The landscaping and screening regulations are intended to improve the physical appearance
of the community; to improve the environmental performance of new development by contributing to the
abatement of heat, noise, glare, wind and dust; to promote natural percolation of storm water and
improvement of air quality; to buffer potentially incompatible uses from one another; and, to protect and
enhance the value of property and neighborhoods within the city.
(B) Applicability:
(1)The provisions of this section shall apply to the following zones: Medium Density Residential
Zone, Medium Density Small Lot Residential Zone, High Density Residential Zone, Residential
Office Zone, Light Business Zone, General Business Zone, Arterial Commercial Overlay Zone,
Heavy Business Zone, Industrial Estates Zone, Light Manufacturing Zone, Heavy Manufacturing
Zone, Commercial Development Zone, Residential Development Zone and Travel Development
Zone. Landscaping of lands within districts such as the Central Business District and Fourth
Street Business District, as defined in this code, shall be subject to Streetscape Improvement
Projects where applicable. In the absence of such projects, the provisions of this section shall
apply.
(2)The provisions of this section shall apply to the Airport Overlay Zone with the exception that
three shrubs may be substituted for each required shade or ornamental tree to conform to
standards of wildlife management required near an airport.
(3) The provisions of this section shall apply to all new development, including surface parking, on
each lot or site upon application for a building permit, except as follows:
(a) Reconstruction or replacement of a lawfully existing use or structure.
(b) Remodeling, rehabilitation or improvements to existing uses or structures which do not
substantially change the location or building footprint of existing structures, or the location and
design of parking facilities or other site improvements. However, additions or enlargements of
existing uses or structures, which increase floor area or impervious coverage by more than 25%
adjacent to the existing street frontage, shall be subject to the provisions of this section, which
shall only apply to that portion of the lot or site where the new development or use occurs.
(c) Residential structures containing three dwelling units on a single lot, or less shall be exempt
from the requirements of this section.
(4) Landscaping which exists on any property shall not be altered or reduced below the minimum
requirements of this section, unless suitable substitutions are made which meet the requirements of this
section, pursuant to a site plan approved by the city.
(5) Any conflict between this section and another section of this chapter shall be resolved in favor of
the more restrictive provision.
(C) Nonconforming Status: Any property or use of property, which as of August 1, 2004 or any
amendment hereto is lawfully nonconforming only as to the regulations relating to landscaping, may be
continued in the same manner as if the landscaping were conforming.
(D) Definitions: The following definitions shall be used for terms contained within this section:
Buffer yard: A landscaped area provided to separate and significantly obstruct the view of two
adjacent land uses or properties from one another.
Canopy tree: A deciduous tree having a minimum mature height of 30 feet and a minimum caliper of
1 inch at the time of planting. One canopy tree equals two understory/ornamental or evergreen trees.
Evergreen tree: An evergreen or conifer tree having a minimum mature height of 20 feet and a
minimum 2 gallon container size or bare root/ball equivalent at the time of planting.
Landscaped area: That area within the boundaries of a given lot consisting primarily of plant
material, including but not limited to grass, trees, shrubs, flowers, vines, groundcover and other
organic plant materials (this does not include plant materials typically used as a cash crop). Tall
varieties of native and ornamental grasses may be planted and left in their natural state in selective and
limited locations, deemed appropriate by the city. Inorganic materials such as brick, stones, aggregate,
ponds or fountains may be used within landscaped areas, provided that such materials comprise no
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 118 / 136
more than 35 percent of the required landscaped area. Flat concrete or asphalt, other than walkways
five feet or less in width, may not be used within a required landscaped area.
Minimum equivalent street landscaping: The minimum landscaped area which must be provided in a
street yard, expressed as a percent of the total area contained within that street yard.
Shrub: A deciduous or evergreen plant having a minimum height of 18 inches at the time of planting,
with a maximum mature height of less than 10 feet.
Street yard:
(1) The area of a lot or parcel which lies between any street property line and the fronting walls
of any building or buildings on the parcel. The street yard shall follow all irregularities or
indentations in the front wall of the building, excluding minor projections or indentations such as
steps or unenclosed porches. For the purposes of defining the street yard area, the front wall shall
be extended from the outermost corners of the building, parallel with the fronting street, until
intersecting with the side property line [see Attachment B hereto]. Street yard depth shall not
exceed 100 feet for the purposes of calculating the minimum equivalent street landscaping area
requirement.
(2) On lots or parcels with multiple buildings, the street yard area shall be defined by all building
front walls having direct, visual frontage onto the street. Any space between buildings equal to 15
percent of the length of such frontage, but in no case more than 100 feet, shall be considered an
extension of the continuous building front wall for the purpose of delineating the street yard.
Understory/ornamental tree: A flowering or non-flowering deciduous tree having a maximum mature
height of 30 feet and a minimum caliper of 2 inch at the time of planting.
(E) Street Yard Landscaping Standards:
(1) Street yard landscaping shall be provided adjacent to each street property line and within street
yards, as set forth below, in accordance with an approved site landscaping plan.
(2) Minimum equivalent street landscaping area:
(Minimum Equivalent Street Landscaping Area
Zoning District Percent of Street Yard
(%)
Minimum Landscaping Depth
of Street Yard*** (ft.)
R3SL 65 20
R3 65 20
R4 60 10
RO 30 10
B1 25 10
B2 20*10*
AC 20 20*
B3 20 10*
ME 20 20
M1 20 20
M2 20 10
M3 20 10
TD 30 30
CD **30
RD **10 or 30
*Unless otherwise established in an approved Streetscape Improvement Project.
**As determined by approved plan
(3) When a lot contains more than one street frontage, the area of all street yards and the
proposed street yard landscaped areas may be combined for the purposes of determining
compliance with this section.
(4) Any required street yard landscaping shall include the following minimum shrub and tree
plantings (or an appropriate equivalent as determined by the city) for every 100 feet (any fraction
of .5 or less rounded to the next lowest number; any fraction exceeding .5 rounded to the next
highest number) of property line adjacent to a public street right-of-way: 1 canopy tree; 1
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 119 / 136
understory/ornamental or evergreen tree; 3 shrubs. Existing trees or shrubs approved for
preservation shall be counted toward satisfaction of this provision.
(F) Buffer Yard and Parking Landscaping Screening Standards:
(1) Buffer yard landscaping shall be installed and maintained adjacent to the affected common side
or rear property line(s), when a use is established in a more intensive zoning district located
adjacent to a less intensive zoning district, as set forth below:
More Intensive Zoning District Required Buffer Yard Width
(ft.)*
Less Intensive Zoning District
RO, B1, B2, AC, B3, CD, TD 10 TA, LLR, R1, R2, R3, R3SL, R4,
RD
ME, M1, M2, M3 20 TA, LLR, R1, R2, R3, R3SL, R4,
RO, RD, CD, TD, B1, B2, B2,
AC, B3
*When an alley, street or railroad R.O.W. separates adjacent districts requiring a buffer yard, the buffer
yard width shall be halved.
(2) Buffer yard landscaping is intended to provide screening of loading docks, refuse collection
points, truck/equipment parking, sources of noise, glare, light, dust, or other negative impacts.
Buffer yard landscaping shall include hedges or screens of evergreen or approved deciduous plant
material, capable of providing a substantial opaque barrier, and attaining a minimum height of 6
feet within three years of planting. Opaque fencing may also supplement the vegetative plantings,
but shall be installed no closer to the property line than the width of the required buffer yard.
(3) Buffer yard landscaping and parking landscaping screening strips shall not be placed on an
easement.
(4) A parking landscaping screening strip, having a Minimum Landscaping Depth of Street Yard
as identified above, shall be installed along any parking area adjacent to a public street right-of-
way. No parking area shall contain more than 100 spaces except as allowed within these
regulations. If a greater number of parking spaces is required, separate parking areas shall be
provided, and shall be separated from other parking areas by landscaped dividing strips, having a
minimum width of 6 feet. These strips shall include trees, shrubs, grasses and other vegetative
coverings for a creative aesthetic appearance. A parking landscaping screening strip shall also
count towards meeting any requirements associated with minimum equivalent street or buffer yard
landscaping.
Alternate plans for parking lots with more than 500 spaces may submitted for approval by a
committee comprised of the Planning Director, Building Department Director and Public Works
Director with recommendations from other appropriate city staff. The Committee shall establish
criteria for the review and approval of larger parking lots based on but not limited to the following
areas of concern: overall area and types of landscaping provided shall not be less than would be
required under the conventional regulations, provision for storm water management and filtering
using best available practices, provisions for adequate lighting, fire protection and security
throughout the lot, provisions for pedestrian access through and around the lot, and provisions for
pedestrian access to the site requiring said parking lot.
(5) A development may continue to comply with the buffer yard landscaping requirements in
effect at the time of issuance of its initial building permit, regardless of whether an adjacent lot or
property is rezoned to a less restrictive zoning district which requires additional buffer yard
landscaping.
(G) Site Plan Requirements:
(1) A site plan showing the required street yard, buffer yard and/or parking screening landscaping
shall be submitted to the city for review and approval as part of the application for a building
permit. The plan shall include, but not be limited to the following:
(a) Location of proposed landscaping drawn to scale.
(b) Location, size, type and condition of proposed plant and non-plant landscaping materials
including fences, walks, ponds, fountains, benches, lighting and irrigation systems.
(c) Estimated date of completion of the installation of all plantings and finishing materials.
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 120 / 136
(H) Installation and Maintenance Requirements:
(1) Required landscaping areas shall be installed and maintained in a neat, clean, orderly and
healthful condition. Maintenance shall include proper pruning of trees and shrubs, mowing of
lawn and grass areas, weeding, removal of litter, fertilizing, replacement of plants consistent with
this section when necessary, and the regular watering of all plantings.
(2) The installation of landscaping shall be completed prior to the issuance of any occupancy
permit for buildings on the property, or commencement of the intended use of the property.
(3) If, at the time of commencement of the intended use of the property or application for a
certificate of occupancy, any required landscaping has not been installed or completed due to
seasonal or climatic conditions or plant material being unavailable, the developer or owner of the
property shall submit the following to the Building Department:
(a) A request for extension of the proposed completion date for installation of the required
landscaping, stating the reason for the request, the property owner's current mailing address,
and a commitment to complete the installation of the landscaping by a date certain, not to
exceed six months from the building completion date.
(b) A drawing showing the plan and layout of the landscaping areas.
(c) A cost estimate for the installation of the landscaping area.
(d) A bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, cash or other financial surety as may be
approved by the City Attorney guaranteeing faithful performance of the owner or
developer's commitment to complete installation of the required landscaping and payable to
the City of Grand Island in the event that the developer fails to carry out the commitments
described in sub-paragraph (a) above.
(4) Upon approval of the foregoing request for extension of time to complete the landscaping
installation, the owner or developer shall be issued a conditional certificate of occupancy or a
conditional letter authorizing commencement of use of the property by the Building Department.
The owner or developer shall complete the installation of the landscaping in accordance with the
commitments made pursuant to sub-paragraph (a) above, and, upon inspection and approval by the
Building Department, a certificate of occupancy or commencement of use letter shall be issued.
All limitations on the use of the property relating to landscaping are deemed to be of no force or
effect at that time, and the City shall release the surety or other security submitted by the owner or
developer.
(5) If the owner or developer has not installed the required landscaping with the commitments made
pursuant to sub-paragraph (a) above, the owner or developer shall be deemed to have granted the City or its
officers, employees, agents or representatives permission to enter upon the property to install the required
landscaping in accordance with the plan submitted pursuant to sub-paragraph (c) above using the surety or
security filed by the owner or developer as payment for said installation. The Building Department shall
send the owner or developer written notice of default and intention to enter onto the property to install
required landscaping by certified mail, return receipt requested, and ordinary first class mail sent to the last
known address of said owner or developer at least five (5) business days prior to making such entry.
Amended by Ordinance No. 9256, effective 04-07-2010
Amended by Ordinance No. 9419, effective 02-15-2013
Amended by Ordinance No. 9422, effective 04-02-2013
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 121 / 136
Railside Business Improvement District - 224 West Third Street - Grand Island, NE 68801
March 26, 2019
Chad Nabity
Regional Planning Director - City of Grand Island
100 E. First Street
Grand Island, NE 68801
Dear Mr. Nabity
With the recent approval of the revisions of the Design Guidelines for the Railside district by CRA, the Railside Business
Improvement District would like to request a revision in the B3 zone. Currently the B3 zone requires a 10 foot setback when
new buildings are considered. In order to maintain the alignment of facades with adjacent structures in the Railside Business
Improvement district, the Railside BID is requesting that changes be made to the B3 zone with regards to the setback
requirement. It is our request that the B3 Zone be revised so that the footprint of any new infill structure extend to the public
right of way at all street facing facades.
The proposed change to the B3 Zone would assist residents, business owners, property owners, property managers, builders,
developers, architects and planners in making decisions regarding new developments in the Railside Business Improvement
District.
We would welcome the opportunity to further discuss the proposed request to maintain the integrity of the Railside Business
Improvement District.
Respectfully,
Amos Anson
Railside BID President
308-390-2455
amosanson@gmail.com
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 122 / 136
Hall County Regional Planning
Commission
Wednesday, June 5, 2019
Regular Meeting
Item J1
School Board Letter
Staff Contact:
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 123 / 136
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 124 / 136
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 125 / 136
Hall County Regional Planning
Commission
Wednesday, June 5, 2019
Regular Meeting
Item J2
Final Plat - Five - H Ranch Subdivision Hall County
Staff Contact:
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 126 / 136
130TH RD SFive-H RanchSubdivision
PROPOSED SUBDIVISIONAERIAL MAP
®
Scale: NONEFor Illustration Purposes
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 127 / 136
130TH RD SFive-HRanchSubdivision
PROPOSED SUBDIVISIONLOCATION MAP
®
Scale: NONEFor Illustration Purposes
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 128 / 136
Grand IslandRegular Meeting - 6/5/2019Page 129 / 136
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 130 / 136
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 131 / 136
Hall County Regional Planning
Commission
Wednesday, June 5, 2019
Regular Meeting
Item J3
Final Plat - Peters Venture Subdivision Hall County
Staff Contact:
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 132 / 136
MONITOR RD NPetersVenturesSubdivision
PROPOSED SUBDIVISIONAERIAL MAP
®
Scale: NONEFor Illustration Purposes
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 133 / 136
MONITOR RD NPetersVenturesSubdivision
PROPOSED SUBDIVISIONLOCATION MAP
®
Scale: NONEFor Illustration Purposes
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 134 / 136
Grand IslandRegular Meeting - 6/5/2019Page 135 / 136
Grand Island Regular Meeting - 6/5/2019 Page 136 / 136