Loading...
03-12-2013 City Council Regular Meeting Packet City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Packet City Council: Linna Dee Donaldson Scott Dugan John Gericke Peg Gilbert Chuck Haase Julie Hehnke Vaughn Minton Mitchell Nickerson Bob Niemann Mike Paulick Mayor: Jay Vavricek City Administrator: Mary Lou Brown City Clerk: RaNae Edwards 7:00 PM Council Chambers - City Hall 100 East 1st Street Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 1 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Call to Order This is an open meeting of the Grand Island City Council. The City of Grand Island abides by the Open Meetings Act in conducting business. A copy of the Open Meetings Act is displayed in the back of this room as required by state law. The City Council may vote to go into Closed Session on any agenda item as allowed by state law. Invocation - Pastor Steve Warriner, Abundant Life Christian Church, 3411 West Faidley Avenue Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call A - SUBMITTAL OF REQUESTS FOR FUTURE ITEMS Individuals who have appropriate items for City Council consideration should complete the Request for Future Agenda Items form located at the Information Booth. If the issue can be handled administratively without Council action, notification will be provided. If the item is scheduled for a meeting or study session, notification of the date will be given. B - RESERVE TIME TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS This is an opportunity for individuals wishing to provide input on any of tonight's agenda items to reserve time to speak. Please come forward, state your name and address, and the Agenda topic on which you will be speaking. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 2 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item C1 Recognition of the Grand Island Northwest Girls Basketball Team for Class “B” State Championship The Mayor and City Council will recognize the Grand Island Northwest High School Girls Basketball Team and their Coach Mike Herzberg for the Class "B" State Girls Basketball Championship held on March 2, 2013 in Lincoln. Congratulations Vikings for a job well done. Staff Contact: Mayor Jay Vavricek Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 3 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 4 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item C2 Proclamation “Go Guard Week” March 18-24, 2013 Ten years ago, Grand Island became the home of a new National Guard aviation facility. This facility houses OH-58, Black Hawk and Chinook helicopters. It will soon be the site of a state of the art National Guard Readiness Center, currently under construction. The Mayor will acknowledge Travis Karr and CCC’s Veterans achievement of being Ranked #2 in the Nation for Veteran Service and a Top 15% Military Friendly School. The Mayor has proclaimed the week of March 18-24, 2013 as "Go Guard Week". See attached PROCAMATION. Staff Contact: Mayor Jay Vavricek Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 5 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 6 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 7 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item C3 Presentation of Downtown Revitalization Plan by Alley Poyner Macchietto Staff Contact: Marco Floreani Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 8 / 318 Council Agenda Memo From:Marco Floreani, Community Development Administrator Meeting:March 12, 2013 Subject:Downtown Revitalization Plan Item #’s:C-3 Presenter(s):Marco Floreani, Community Development Administrator Alley Poyner Macchietto Architecture, Lead Consultants Background The City of Grand Island received a Downtown Revitalization Phase 1 Pre-Development Planning Grant for the amount of $30,000 from the Nebraska Department of Economic Development for a planning project that meets the CDBG national objective of aiding in the elimination conditions related to slum and blight. A combination of matching funds and in-kind services of were committed from City of Grand Island Program Income Reuse Funds and from Business Improvement District #8 for a project cost of $50,000, including general administration. The developed Downtown Revitalization Plan has been prepared by lead consultants Alley Poyner Macchietto, an architecture firm from Omaha. In addition to the consultant’s expertise, the plan incorporates information gathered during a November 14, 2012 public forum and several focus group discussions. The Downtown Revitalization Plan will be used as a resource for future downtown development and includes suggestions for funding Community Development Block Grant projects within the boundaries of Business Improvement District # 8. On March 29, 2013, the City of Grand Island will be submitting a Community Development Block Grant Application to the Nebraska Department of Economic Development for Downtown Revitalization Phase II funds. The anticipated award is $350,000 with a local match of 25%. A public hearing will be held on March 26, 2013 to approve the Phase II CDBG grant application. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 9 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item E1 Public Hearing on Acquisition of Utility Easement - 2703 East Highway 30 - CMJ Rentals Staff Contact: Tim Luchsinger, Utilities Director Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 10 / 318 Council Agenda Memo From:Robert H. Smith, Asst. Utilities Director Meeting:March 12, 2013 Subject:Acquisition of Utility Easement – 2703 East Highway 30 - CMJ Rentals Item #’s:E- 1 & G-3 Presenter(s):Timothy Luchsinger, Utilities Director Background Nebraska State Law requires that acquisition of property must be approved by City Council. The Utilities Department needs to acquire an easement relative to the property of CMJ Rentals located at the southwest corner of the Lazy V Apartments at 2703 East Highway 30, in the City of Grand Island, Hall County, in order to have access to install, upgrade, maintain, and repair power appurtenances, including lines and transformers. Discussion This easement will be used to deliver electrical power closer to the load. Lazy V has reconstructed one building and is adding a larger service. Extending the overhead line and relocating the transformer will improve the service. Alternatives It appears that the Council has the following alternatives concerning the issue at hand. The Council may: 1.Make a motion to approve 2.Refer the issue to a Committee 3.Postpone the issue to future date 4. Take no action on the issue Recommendation City Administration recommends that the Council approve the resolution for the acquisition of the easement for one dollar ($1.00). Sample Motion Move to approve acquisition of the Utility Easement. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 11 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 12 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item E2 Public Hearing on the One & Six Year Street Improvement Plan Staff Contact: Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 13 / 318 Council Agenda Memo From:Shannon Callahan, Street Superintendent Meeting:March 12, 2013 Subject:Public Hearing on the One & Six Year Street Improvement Plan Item #’s:E-2 & I-1 Presenter(s):Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Department Background Adoption of a One & Six Year Street Improvement Plan is mandatory by State Law as part of the requirements to receive approximately three million dollars of state gas tax funds each year. The Public Works Department develops this program through a process to prioritize street projects taking into consideration many factors such as: Availability of funds Condition of the street Traffic counts Eligibility for State/Federal funds Redevelopment patterns Public/Council input The City engages in a public process to assure input into the policy making process. The proposed One & Six Year Street Improvement Plan resulted in the following steps: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 – City Council referred the plan to the Regional Planning Commission Wednesday, February 6, 2013 – Regional Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing and forwarded the recommendation to the City Council Tuesday, February 12, 2013 – City Council heard presentation from Staff, conducted a Public Hearing and passed a Resolution adopting the plan February 26, 2013 – One & Six Year Street Improvement Plan due at the Nebraska Department of Roads The Notice of Public Hearing for the One & Six Year Street Improvement Plan was published in the Grand Island Independent on January 30, 2013. Approval of the plan is being brought before City Council again out of concern that the City did not fully comply with legal notice requirements by not posting notice in three public places. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 14 / 318 The proposed Council action will not result in a loss of funding from the Nebraska Department of Roads. Discussion A Public Hearing was conducted, testimony received and discussion held on the One & Six Year Street Improvement Plan at the Grand Island/Hall County Regional Planning Commission meeting on February 6, 2013. The commission forwarded the One & Six Year Street Improvement Plan to the City Council with a recommendation for approval. The projects listed in the One & Six Year Plan for calendar year 2013 are considered definite projects. These projects were in the approved fiscal year 2013 budget. Many of the projects listed in the One & Six Year Plan for 2014 through 2018 are included in the City’s budget, but are subject to schedule changes depending upon coordination and approval of State and Federal funding. Alternatives It appears that the Council has the following alternatives concerning the issue at hand. The Council may: 1.Move to approve 2.Refer the issue to a Committee 3.Postpone the issue to future date 4.Take no action on the issue Recommendation City Administration recommends that the Council conduct a Public Hearing and approve the One & Six Year Street Improvement Plan. Sample Motion Move to approve the One & Six Year Street Improvement Plan. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 15 / 318 2013 ONE AND SIX YEAR STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 16 / 318 Sheet 1 of 1 County:City:Village: LENGTH UNIT OF MEASURE PROJECTED COST CONTRACT PROJECT OWN FORCES DATE COMPLETED (Nearest Tenth) (Thousands)(Actual or Estimated) M-310 (89)1.2 MILE Delayed, Construction in 2015 M-310 (411)2.0 MILE 2,794 X Est. June 2013 M-310 (508)0.7 MILE Delayed to 1-Year Plan M-310 (515)0.2 MILE 248 X July 2012 M-310 (537)300.0 FEET Delayed to 1-Year Plan M-310 (578)1.9 MILE 1,144 X October 2012 M-310 (579)4.5 MILE Delayed to 1-Year Plan, construction completed in 2014 M-310 (591)100.0 FEET Delayed to 1-Year Plan M-310 (593)1.3 MILE 603 X August 2012 M-310 (267)220.0 FEET Delayed to 2014 M-310 (459)Deleted, not street improvement project M-310 (461)Deleted, not street improvement project M-310 (544)Deleted, not street improvement project M-310 (595)Deleted, not street improvement project M-310 (596)Deleted, not street improvement project M-310 (447)Deleted, not street improvement project M-310 (572)Deleted, not street improvement project M-310 (590)Deleted, not street improvement project M-310 (597)0.0 MILE 102 X June 2012 Signature:Title:Date: NBCS Form 11, Jul 96 Street Superintendent PROJECT NUMBER Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 11 Report of Previous Year Highway or Street Improvement Year Ending:December 31, 2012 GRAND ISLAND Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 17 / 318 Sheet:1 of 1 County:City:Village: PRIORITY NUMBER LENGTH UNIT OF MEASURE ESTIMATED COST (Nearest Tenth) (Thousands) 1 M-310 (579)4.5 MILE 3,413 2 M-310 (508)0.7 MILE 1,495 3 M-310 (537)300.0 FEET 384 4 M-310 (591)100.0 FEET 40 5 M-310 (588)1.0 MILE 1,200 Signature:Title:Date: NBCS Form 8, Jul 96 Shoulder Imp @ BNSF Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 8 Summary of One-Year Plan Year Ending:December 31, 2012 GRAND ISLAND Federal Aid Project PROJECT NUMBER REMARKS Federal Aid Project Federal Aid Project Blaine Street Paving Street Superintendent Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 18 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 19 / 318 Sheet:1 of 1 County:City:Village: PRIORITY NUMBER LENGTH UNIT OF MEASURE ESTIMATED COST (Nearest Tenth) (Thousands) 1 M-310 (579)4.5 MILE 3,413 2 M-310 (508)0.7 MILE 1,495 3 M-310 (537)300.0 FEET 384 4 M-310 (89)1.2 MILE 8,151 5 M-310 (581)12.2 MILE 5,745 6 M-310 (623)9.6 MILE 6,019 7 M-310 (591)100.0 FEET 40 8 M-310 (267)220.0 FEET 200 9 M-310 (624)0.4 MILE 160 10 M-310 (622)0.8 MILE 250 11 M-310 (588)1.0 MILE 1,200 12 M-310 (598)600.0 FEET 45 13 M-310 (353)0.4 MILE 820 14 M-310 (609)1.0 MILE 800 15 M-310 (599)1.0 MILE 700 16 M-310 (520)2.0 MILE 1,500 Signature:Title:Date: NBCS Form 9, Jul 96 Blaine St Paving from Schimmer to Wildwood - CDBG Blaine St Bridges Stuhr Rd Concrete Overlay Shady Bend Rd - Mill & Resurface/Bridge Repair Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 9 Summary of Six-Year Plan Six-Year Period Ending:December 31, 2012 GRAND ISLAND Custer & 15th - Realign Dwy/Traffic Signal Install - FED AID Capital Avenue Widening - Webb to Broadwell Hwy 30 Resurfacing - NDOR Hwy 281 in GI & North - NDOR Broadwell Ave Shoulder Improvement @ BNSF Crossing PROJECT NUMBER REMARKS Various Location Resurfacing - FED AID US Hwy 30 Drainage Improvements - FED AID Skypark Rd Improvements - Capital to Airport Skypark Rd Improvements - Airport to Abbott Capital Ave Widening - Broadwell to Skypark Skypark & Airport Intersection Improvements Faidley Ave extention to North Rd Street Superintendent Reasons for major changes in the Six-Year program are as follows: Leadership change in the City of Grand Island Public Works Department recongnizing the need to revise and edit the projects being listed on the annual One- and Six-Year Plan. A list of the deleted projects, as well as, projects that have been removed until they are programmed/funded are attached. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 20 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 21 / 318 M-310 (447)Trail along Moores Creek Drain - State to Capital Connector M-310 (459)Southwest Drainage Project (CCC to Wood River) M-310 (461)Construction of NW GI Flood Control Project M-310 (485)PVIP Drainage Project - Phase I (Design) M-310 (507)Independence - Construct Culverts & Fill in West Ditch M-310 (511)Moores Creek - Old Potash to Edna M-310 (544)Concrete Lining of Drainage Ditches M-310 (559)Concrete Lining of Drainage Ditches M-310 (563)Concrete Lining of Drainage Ditches M-310 (565)Trail along Locust from US Hwy 34 to Stagecoach M-310 (568)Update Moores Creek Drainage Plan M-310 (572)Annual Sidewalk Projects M-310 (576)Misc. Major Drainage Development M-310 (590)Third & Wheeler Downtown Historical Lighting Project M-310 (595)Highway 281 Drainage Project - Phase I M-310 (596)Storm Cell Improvements M-310 (600)Annual Asphalt Resurfacing Project M-310 (601)Storm Cell Improvements M-310 (602)Highway 281 Drainage Project - Phase II M-310 (603)Comprehensive Drainage Plan M-310 (605)Trail along Broadwell Ave - Capital Ave to Eagle Scout Park - PE M-310 (611)Annual Asphalt Resurfacing Project M-310 (612)Highway 281 Drainage Project - Phase III M-310 (613)Storm Cell Improvements M-310 (616)Annual Asphalt Resurfacing Project M-310 (617)Storm Cell Improvements M-310 (619)Annual Asphalt Resurfacing Project M-310 (620)Storm Cell Improvements M-310 (621)Annual Asphalt Resurfaincg Project M-310 (499A)Broadwell Ave/UPRR - Environmental Study/Preliminary Engineering M-310 (507A)Independence Avenue Drainage - Design M-310 (584A)Stolley Park Corridor Improvements (Design) DELETED PROJECTS Deleted & Removed Projects City of Grand Island - 2013 1 of 2 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 22 / 318 Deleted & Removed Projects City of Grand Island - 2013 M-310 (352)Hwy 30 Relocation - US 281 West M-310 (458)Signal @ US Highway 34/281 and Wildwood Rd M-310 (497)Lighting on US Highway 281 from Stolley Park Rd to Old Potash Hwy M-310 (499)Broadwell Ave/UPRR - Construction M-310 (502)Shady Bend Rd @ UPRR -E Bypass M-310 (518)Quiet Zone - UPRR Corridor - Lincoln, Broadwell & Blaine/Custer M-310 (521)Swift Rd - WWTP to Stuhr Rd M-310 (527)Misc. Safety Projects - TBD M-310 (528)State/Diers Intersection Improvements M-310 (533)Husker Hwy W of US Hwy 34/281 Intersection M-310 (535)Barr Middle School Traffic Circulation Improvements M-310 (538)Capital Ave & North Rd Intersection Improvement M-310 (539)3rd St Widening - Adams to Eddy M-310 (540)North Rd & 13th St Intersection Improvements M-310 (545)Signal @ US Hwy 34/281 and Rae Rd M-310 (546)Annual Paving Program (Assessment Districts) - W Stolley Park Rd & Westwood Park Sub M-310 (550)Left Turn Lane - North Rd @ NWHS M-310 (551)Stolley Park Rd & North Rd Intersection M-310 (552)Left Turn Lane on Husker Hwy @ HLHS M-310 (553)Left Turn Lane on 13th @ Redwood/Mansfield M-310 (554)Resurface Wildwood from US Hwy 281 to Locust St M-310 (556)North Rd over UPRR M-310 (564)Stolley - Fonner/HEC/Fair Entrance to Stuhr Rd M-310 (574)Misc. Signals - TBD M-310 (580)Highway 281 Southbound Repair M-310 (583)North Rd & Old Potash Intersection Improvements M-310 (585)State Street - Webb Rd to Broadwell Ave Safety Improvement M-310 (586)Broadwell Ave - Capital to Airport Rd M-310 (587)Webb Rd - UPRR to south of Stolley Park Rd M-310 (599)Sky Park Improvements - Airport Rd to Abbott Rd M-310 (604)Highway 281 Safety Enhancement Improvement Project M-310 (606)Webb Rd & State St Intersection (Geometrics) M-310 (607)Diers Ave & State Street / US Hwy 281 - Design (Geometrics) M-310 (608)Locust St & Anna St (Geometrics) M-310 (610)Sycamore St Underpass - Complete Rebuild/Rehab (drainage/pavement) - Phase I M-310 (618)Eddy Street Underpass Complete Rebuild/Rehab (drainage/pavement) - Phase I M-310 (535A)Barr Middle School Traffic Circulation Improvements (Design) REMOVED PROJECTS 2 of 2 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 23 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Capital Avenue from Webb Road to Broadwell Avenue Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphalt Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = 8,749, 2031 = 11,000 Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Urban Minor Arterial PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Municipal Surfacing Thickness: 8" Width: 62' Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Double 12' Rise: 4' Length: 50' Type: Concrete Culvert Diameter: 48" Length: 175' Type: Concrete Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Widen roadway to from 2 lanes to 5 lanes with curb & gutter. Federal Aid Project No. URB-5436(5) ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 1,630 6,521 8,151 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 1.2 Mile Project No.: M-310(89) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 24 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Blaine Street N of Hwy 34 at Wood River crossing Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) 2 (two) Bridges - See bridge inventory data attached for existing attributes U104513905 - South Structure U104513910 - North Structure Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = 2815, 2031 = 6,000 Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Collector PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Municipal (HL93) Surfacing Thickness: varies Width: 18' or 25' Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: 12' Rise: 6' Length: 48' Type: Concrete Culvert Diameter: 42" Length: 48' Type: Arch RCP Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Bridge U104513910 to be replaced by two box culverts of the same size. Bridge U104513905 to be replaced by two Arch RCP culvert pipes. Hydraulic Analysis was conducted in 2002 and will be double checked before final design is approved. ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 200 200 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 220 Feet Project No.: M-310(267) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 25 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 26 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 27 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 28 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 29 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 30 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 31 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 32 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 33 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 34 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 35 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 36 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 37 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 38 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Faidley Avenue from North Road to East end of Faidley Ave. Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) None (new construction) Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = 0, 2031 = 2,000 Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Collector PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Local Surfacing Thickness: Width: Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: New construction - Design has not been completed. Form 7 will be updated as the design is finalized. Noted on 2004 Comprehensive Transportation Plan. ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 800 800 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 0.4 Mile Project No.: M-310(353) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 39 / 318 City of Grand Island, Nebraska Page 36 Comprehensive Transportation Plan 6.2 East / West Traffic Flow Improvements Widen US Highway 30 on 2nd Street between Grant and Greenwich Streets: As shown in the appendix, this proposal would involve widening US Highway 30 in order to provide a center left turn lane through a heavily commercialized area, west of the downtown district. Typically, a facility of this type would have a capacity of about 16,700 vpd. However, it carries upwards of 20,000 vpd between Grant and Greenwich Streets, which shows that the functional usefulness of this roadway is being taxed. It is forecasted to carry about 22,000 vpd in 2020 with V/C ratios of about 1.2. Thus a 4 lane cross section would be inadequate to serve future traffic. Adding a center left turn lane in this location would increase the capacity of the facility by approximately 30%. The center left turn lane would increase the safety in the corridor by removing turning movements from the through traffic flow. Moreover, the existing level of access to businesses and residences adjacent to the highway would be maintained but the access points may need some relocation. Because of the operational improvements, widening of US Highway 30 would be expected to attract an additional 2000 vpd. The widening of this roadway would have adjacent land use impacts. The minimum travel way for a 5-lane section would be approximately 64 feet. The typical existing cross section is about 44 to 50 feet. Construction of an additional roadway width would require removal of a number of adjacent trees and the relocation of existing sidewalks. The 1990 Comprehensive Plan also recommended this project in light of the capacity deficiency identified on this roadway. Restripe Stolley Park Road between Webb Road and Locust Street: As shown in the appendix, this proposal would involve striping Stolley Park Road between Webb Road and Locust Street from 2 lanes to 3. Stolley Park Road between Webb Road and Locust Street has a typical capacity between 8,400 and 10,900 vpd and carries about 10,000 vpd. Widening this roadway would help alleviate some of the congestion associated with this roadway in the present and in the future. It is forecasted to carry about 12,000-13,000 vpd between Webb Road and Locust Street in 2020 in the absence of any improvements. This results in a V/C ratio between 1.0 and 1.4. Widening Stolley Park Road from 2 to 3 lanes (to provide a capacity approximately 12,500 vpd) from Webb Road to Locust Street would draw an additional 1500-3000 vpd on Stolley Park Road, on the average, and a reduction in V/C ratios to between 1.0 and 1.2. This project was also recommended in the 1990 Comprehensive Plan to alleviate the capacity deficiencies identified on this roadway. Extend Faidley to North Road: This project involves the extension of Faidley to North Road. This roadway would serve as an east/west collector and would likely carry 2,000 vpd in 2020. This project was not incorporated in the 1990 Comprehensive Plan. Widen Husker Highway between Route 30 and Stuhr Road: This project involves the widening of Husker Highway from 2 to 4 lanes between US Highway 30 and Stuhr Road. Husker Highway currently has a capacity on the order of 9,000-13,700 vpd. Husker Highway currently carries the following traffic volumes: x 1,500 vpd west of Grand Island between US Highway 30 and US Highway 281 x 5,000 vpd south of Grand Island between US Highway 281 and Locust Street x 4,000 vpd east of Grand Island between Locust Street and Stuhr Road Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 40 / 318 County:City:Village: 2012 2032 Thickness:Width: X Grading X Concrete X Right of Way X Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments Armor Coat X Drainage Structures Fencing Asphalt X Erosion Control Sidewalk Length: Length: Span:Rise:Length: Length: *County:*City:*State:*Federal:*Other:*Total: Signature:Title:Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- & Six- Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project GRAND ISLAND Design Standard Number:Surfacing Municipal Location Description: US Hwy 34 from US Hwy 281 to South Locust St Project Description: Nebraska Department of Roads Project No. STP-34-4 (126). Concrete repair, add turn lanes at Blaine Street, and bridge repair. Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Concrete Average Daily Traffic:Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Major Arterial PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT New Bridge:Roadway Width:Type: Bridge to Remain in Place:Roadway Width:Type: Box Culvert Type: Culvert Diameter:Type: Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)124 3,882 Bridges and Culverts Sized X YES N/A Street Superintendent 4,006*OPTIONAL Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)Project No.: 2.0 M-310(411) Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 41 / 318 NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF ROADS NOTICE OF HIGHWAY PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING Thursday, January 5, 2011; 4:00 – 6:00 PM Information Open House Public Meeting Central Community College, 3134 W. US Highway 34, Grand island, NE STPD-34-4(126), US-281 to Locust St., Grand Island; CN 41994 The Nebraska Department of Roads (NDOR) will hold a public information open house regarding the refurbishment of U. S. Highway 34 (US-34) from the intersection of U. S. Highway 281 (US-281) to South Locust Street, in Grand Island. The meeting will be held at Central Community College in Grand Island, Thursday, January 5, 2012, 4:00-6:00 P.M. Identified as STPD-34-4 (126), US-281 to Locust St., Grand Island, C.N. 41994, the proposed project would be constructed entirely within Hall County, Nebraska, mostly within the city limits of Grand Island. This proposed project would resurface the existing two-lane asphalt roadway and shoulders, including refurbishment of two bridge structures. The project consists of concrete repair as needed, plus milling and overlaying the existing US-34 roadway and surfaced shoulders with new asphalt. At the Blaine Street intersection, US-34 would be widened to add left-turn lanes. A short raised island on the north leg of Blaine Street would be added to better direct southbound traffic as it approaches the intersection. New roadway lighting will be provided at the intersection. Just east of Wortman Drive, the Union Pacific Railroad crossing approaches would be improved. The Wood River Bridge, between Garland and Blaine Streets, would be widened from 30-feet to 44-feet and refurbishments include a new roadway overlay, new approach sections, and new guardrails installed. The Wood River overflow bridge, just west of Blaine St., would be removed and replaced with a concrete box culvert. Two existing culverts east of Blaine would also be extended. The proposed construction is scheduled to commence in the summer of 2012 and take approximately five months. The construction will require the project to be built with detouring of US-34 traffic, using Interstate 80 (I-80) and South Locust Street. US-34 in Grand Island will be open to local traffic except during construction of the bridge, box culvert and widening for the left-turn lanes at Blaine Street. It is estimated US-34 would be closed to local traffic between Blaine Street and Catfish Avenue for three weeks and between Garland Street and Blaine Street for three months. The remainder of the project will be constructed “under traffic” with appropriate traffic control. Detour maps and information will be available at the meeting. Acquisition of a total of 0.16 acres of new right-of- way (ROW) will be required for this project from three tracts located adjacent to US-34 at the Blaine Street intersection; negotiations are in progress. The existing Control of Access along US-34 at the Blaine Street intersection will be perpetuated. Wetlands have been delineated along portions of this project. There will be minimal impacts resulting from construction activities, however no wetland mitigation will be required. The public meeting is being held to provide information and receive input regarding this project. All citizens are invited to attend and present relevant comments and questions. Design information will be displayed and personnel from NDOR will be present to answer questions and receive comments. The information “open house” format allows the public to come, gather pertinent information about the project, speak one-on-one with project personnel, and leave as they wish. All materials will be presented in both English and Spanish. A translator will be present. ____________________________________ NDOR will make every reasonable accommodation to provide an accessible meeting facility for all persons. Appropriate provisions for the hearing and visually challenged or persons with limited English proficiency (LEP) will be made if the Department is notified by December 22, 2011. Notification should be submitted to: Greg Weinert, Public Hearings Officer, Nebraska Department of Roads, P.O. Box 94759, Lincoln, NE 68509-4759; greg.weinert@nebraska.gov; voice telephone (402) 479-4871, TDD telephone (402) 479-3834, Fax (402) 479-3989. Information regarding the proposed project will be available after the meeting on the NDOR website at www.transportation.nebraska.gov/projects/ by clicking on the “US-34 GI” link. For further information, contact Don Turek, NDOR Roadway Design, (402) 479-4441, don.turek@nebraska.gov; or Wes Wahlgren, NDOR District Four Engineer, (308) 385-6265, wes.wahlgren@nebraska.gov. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 42 / 318 NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF ROADS Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 43 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Logan St from 2nd St to 1st St; Harrison St from 1st to Division St; Broadwell Ave from 2nd St to Division St; Monroe St. from Division St to Koenig St Madison St from 2nd St to Division St; 1st St from Logan St to Harrison St; & Division St from Harrison St to Madison St Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Concrete and/or concrete with bituminous overlay, storm sewer Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = , 2031 = Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Urban Minor Aterial/Local Roads PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Municipal Surfacing Thickness: Width: Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Underground storm drainage pipe construction, PCC pavement removal & replacement, landscaping and seeding. Federal Aid Project ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 542 953 1,495 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 0.7 Mile Project No.: M-310(508) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 44 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 45 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: 2012 Program will be for the construction of "quite zones" along the UPRR Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Varies from concrete, asphalt and brick depending on location. Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = 2,500, 2031 = 5,000 Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Urban Minor Arterial/Local Roads PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Surfacing Thickness: Width: Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Specific locations for quite zones in 2009 are the Walnut, Elm, Pine and Oak Street crossings with the UPRR ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 107 140 247 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) N/A Project No.: M-310(515) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 46 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Capital Avenue from Broadwell Avenue to Sky Park Rd Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphalt Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = 8,616, 2031 = 12,500 Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Other Arterial PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Municipal Surfacing Thickness: 8" Width: 24' Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Widen to three-lane section add pipe to connect existing culverts. ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 1,500 1,500 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 2.0 Miles Project No.: M-310(520) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 47 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Custer Avenue and 15th Street Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Concrete Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = 6,000, 2031 = 12,000 Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Urban Collector PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Municipal Surfacing Thickness: Width: Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: New Traffic Signal installation Federal Aid Project No. STRS-40(57) ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 67 317 384 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 300 Feet Project No.: M-310(537) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 48 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Highway 30 - Grant St to Claude Rd Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Concrete Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = , 2031 = Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) N/A PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Surfacing Thickness: Width: Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Full-depth concrete repair and diamond grinding. This is a NDOR project with city financial contributions. ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 572 572 1,144 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 1.6 Project No.: M-310(578) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 49 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Various Locations - Resurfacing 1.Blaine St from Garland to Stolley Park; 2. Blaine St from Stolley Park to crossing with Bike Trail; 3. 1st St trom Walnut to Sycamore; 4. North Road from 13th to State; 5. Independence Ave from Captial to Hwy 2; 6. Broadwell Ave from Anna to 2nd ; & 7. Broadwell Ave from 2nd to State Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphaltic Concrete Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = , 2031 = Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Various PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Municipal Surfacing Thickness: Width: Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Asphalt resurfacing for various federal aid routes within the City. Received Relaxation of Standards for shoulder width from the NBCS at October 19, 2012 meeting. ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 683 2,730 3,413 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) UNK Project No.: M-310(579) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 50 / 318 Stuhr Rd S13th St WNorth Rd NLocust St SWebb Rd NBlaine St SCapital Ave W Diers Ave NState St W St Paul RdEngleman Rd N3 rd S t WBroadwell Ave NAirport Rd E Oak St NCapital Ave E Airport Rd W 4 th S t E North Rd SUS Highway 281 SCuster Ave NA n n a S t W U S H ig hw ay 30 W J o h n S t W Sky Park Rd1 s t S t W El m St NK o e n ig S t W L o u is e S t WEd d y St NOld Potash Hwy W Webb Rd S7 th S t E Pi ne St ND iv is io n S t W 7 t h S t W Husker Hwy C h a rle s S t W O ld H igh w a y 30 W 9 th S t W Faidley Ave W Syc amo r e St N6 th S t W North Front St W 8 th S t W Wal nut St NVi ne St NAdams St SWheel er Ave NCl ar k St N4th St W 5th St W Bismark Rd E College St Park Ave N2 n d S t W US Highway 34 W Ch e rr y St SNebraska Highway 2 W Redwood RdForrest St Old Highway 2 W Cottage St Huston Ave NIndependence AveVine St SAr t h u r St SCl ar k St SClaude Rd5 t h S t E Oak St SKi mb all Ave NUS Highway 281 N US Highway 34 E Stolley Park Rd W Stagecoach Rd James RdKennedy DrEngleman Rd SBeal St Allen DrPioneer BlvdLariat Ln U S Hi g h way 3 0 E Bass Rd Stolley Park Rd EHancock AveMidaro Dr Fonner Park Rd EElm St SWhite AveSylvan StGrand Island Ave N11th St W 1 0 th S t WNorthwest AveMansfield RdGr ant St SStauss Rd Blake St Geddes StLafayette Ave NHarrison St SPark Dr August St STalc DrRiverside DrSouth St W Mason Ave S o u th F ro n t S t W Til den St SChurch Rd Dodge St W e s tg a te R d 1 s t S t E Manchester Rd Macron StTrust St Gold RdEddy St SJay StRainbow RdJan StApache RdHagge Ave 2 n d S t E Hall St K e n t A ve 3 r d S t E Farmstead RdCe d ar St N20th St E South St E Ada StShanna St Howard Ave N12th St E 14th St E Taft Av eRoush Ln Li ncol n Av e SPonderosa DrLillie Dr Cannon Rd Arapahoe AveSchroeder Ave8 t h S t EIdaho AveCarleton AveSagewood AveDriftwood Dr Wort man DrCraig Dr Brentwood BlvdPiper StKay Ave Edna Dr Riverview DrGeorge St Sandalwood Dr Oriole St 17th St W India nhe ad D rDel Mar AveCherokee Ave NLamar Ave Pine St S11th St E Graham AveMary Ln Kimball Ave SEbony Ln18th St E Spur Ln Cottonwood RdBl ai ne St NAllen Ave Ruby AveSycamore St SEwoldt Rd Roth Rd Ramada RdArrowhead RdY u n d S tMeadow RdA r c h A v e Kruse AveBellwood DrReed Rd I ngall s StO Flannagan StGateway AveWaugh St W West LnReuting Rd Plum St SBrahma StFrontage Rd Lake St 2 1 s t S t E Norwood Dr Angel LnSunset Ave EWillow StSandra Rd Old Lincoln Hwy W Garland StFonner Park Rd W Cochin StSt Patrick AveHampton Rd Madi son St NMemorial Park RdOrleans DrKaufman AveIndianhead Rd Holland DrNordic Rd Marian Rd Elmwood Dr Capital Trailer CtLee StreetFreedom DrWicklow Dr18th St W Enterprise Ave Cl ebur n St NIndian Grass Rd Johnson DrS o u th F ro n t S t E Commanche AveSothman DrOxnard Ave Eilenstine Rd ERoberts St E Phoenix Ave EAspen CirNorseman Ave Windridge AveOverland DrWilliam St2 3 r d S t W Oklahoma Ave EUPRR Dri v eAster Dr Lakeview CirChant ill y St Greenwood Dr Augusta Parkway Doreen StMabel DrIsland Cir Vi a Tri voli Catfish AveLaura AveWeis DrHillside DrArt h ur St N1 s t S t W Engleman Rd SUS Highway 281 NHusker Hwy Hall St Hall St North Rd SAda St5 th S t W Norseman AveIdaho AveUS Highway 281 SSunset Ave E 4 t h S t W 10th St W 6th St WUS Highway 281 NStolley Park Rd W 11 t h S t W PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FEDERAL AID PROJECTS BLAINE ST. - Garland to Stolley Park Rd BLAINE ST. - Stolley Park Rd to Bike Trail 1st ST - Walnut to Sycamore NORTH ROAD - 13th to State INDEPENDENCE AVE. - Capital Ave to Neb. Hwy #2 BROADWELL AVE. - 2nd to State BROADWELL AVE. - Anna to 2nd £ PLOT 01-25-2011-----FED- Aid-Overlay-2013.mxd Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 51 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 52 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 53 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 54 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 55 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 56 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 57 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: US Highway 30 - Wood River to Grand Island Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphalt (3R Project) Average Daily Traffic: 2010 = 5300, 2030 = UNK Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Major Arterial PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: 001.03 Surfacing Thickness: Width: Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: US Highway 30 resurfacing, NDOR Project with City financial contribution. NDOR Project No. STPD-30-4(149) ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 584 5,161 5,745 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 12.2 Mile Project No.: M-310(581) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 58 / 318 County:City:Village: 2012 1,326 2032 2,000 Thickness:Width: 8 IN.28 FT. X Grading X Concrete Rigt of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments Armor Coat X Drainage Structures Fencing Asphalt X Erosion Control Sidewalk Length: Length: Span:Rise:Length: Length: *County:*City:*State:*Federal:*Other:*Total: Signature:Title:Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- & Six- Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project GRAND ISLAND Design Standard Number:Surfacing Municipal Location Description: Blaine Street from Schimmer Dr. to Wildwood Dr. Project Description: Concrete paving for industrial development site partially funded through Community Block Development Grant and LB-840 Funds. Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Gravel Average Daily Traffic:Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Local PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT New Bridge:Roadway Width:Type: Bridge to Remain in Place:Roadway Width:Type: Box Culvert Type: Culvert Diameter:Type: Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Funding: 575,000 - LB840 and 382,000 - CDBG ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)243 957 Bridges and Culverts Sized YES N/A 1,200*OPTIONAL Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)Project No.: 1.0 MILE M-310(588) Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 59 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Broadwell Avenue from 45' South of BNSF Crossing (north of Hwy 2) to BNSF Crossing. Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphaltic Concrete, Dirst Shoulder Average Daily Traffic: 2008 = 5,135, 2028 = UNK Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Other Arterial PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Municipal Surfacing Thickness: 6" Width: 27' Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Shoulder Widening: 8' Concrete shoulder through the crossing, both sides of roadway. ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 52 52 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 100 Feet Project No.: M-310 (591) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 60 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Annual Asphalt Resurfacing Project - various areas throughout the City Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphalt - Maintenance Project Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = , 2031 = Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Various PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Maintenance Surfacing Thickness: Width: Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 603 750 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 1.3 Project No.: M-310(593) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 61 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Various locations throughout the City Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Concrete or Asphalt Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = , 2031 = Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) N/A PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Surfacing Thickness: Width: Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Install ADA compliant handicap sidewalk ramps in various areas of the City - this program follows the City's previous year asphalt resurfacing project ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 125 125 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) UNK Project No.: M-310(597) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 62 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Airport Rd & Sky Park Rd Intersection Improvements Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphalt Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = 1,550, 2031 = Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Local PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Municipal Surfacing Thickness: UNK Width: 24' Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Widen turning radii at intersection ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 45 45 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 600 Feet Project No.: M-310(598) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 63 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Sky Park Road Improvements - Airport Rd to Abbott Rd Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphalt Average Daily Traffic: 2008 = 1,550, 2031 = TBD Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Local PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Municipal Surfacing Thickness: 8" Width: 24' Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Widen roadway and add lighting to improve safety and accommodate higher traffic volume for increased Airport usage. ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 700 700 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 1.0 Mile Project No.: M-310(599) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 64 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Sky Park Road from Capital Avenue to Airport Road Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphalt Average Daily Traffic: 2008 = 1,280, 2031 = TBD Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Local PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Municipal Surfacing Thickness: 8" Width: 24' Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Improve roadway for potential Truck Route. ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 800 800 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) UNK Project No.: M-310(609) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 65 / 318 County:City:Village: 2013 2,420 2033 TBD Thickness:Width: 8"24' X Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments Armor Coat X Drainage Structures Fencing X Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalk Length: 40' Length: Span:Rise:Length: Length: *County:*City:*State:*Federal:*Other:*Total: Signature:Title:Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- & Six- Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project GRAND ISLAND Design Standard Number:Surfacing Municipal Location Description: Shady Bend Rd just north of Gregory Ave to Bismark Rd. Project Description: Resurfacing project to restore roadway to structually sound state and to accommodate increasing truck traffic. Minor bridge repair and box culvert repair as will be determined. Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphalt, bridge, box culvert, guardrail Average Daily Traffic:Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Other Arterial & Local PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT New Bridge:Roadway Width:Type: Bridge to Remain in Place:Roadway Width:Type: 40'Concrete Box Culvert Box Culvert Type: Culvert Diameter:Type: Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)250 Bridges and Culverts Sized YES N/A Street Superintendent 250*OPTIONAL Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)Project No.: 0.8 MILE M-310(622) Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 66 / 318 County:City:Village: 2012 2032 Thickness:Width: Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalk Length: Length: Span:Rise:Length: Length: *County:*City:*State:*Federal:*Other:*Total: Signature:Title:Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Street Superintendent 6,019*OPTIONAL Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)Project No.: 9.6 (Total)M-310 (623) Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)1,166 4,853 Bridges and Culverts Sized YES N/A Box Culvert Type: Culvert Diameter:Type: Bridge to Remain in Place:Roadway Width:Type: New Bridge:Roadway Width:Type: Design Standard Number:Surfacing 3R on Municipal State Hwy Location Description: Hwy 281 from mile post 68.90 to Ref. Post 78.5; In GI City Limits from Viaduct over Old Hwy 30 to Airport Road (3.7 Miles) Project Description: Full Depth Concrete Repair and Resurfacing; NDOR Project No. NH-281(127) with City participation Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Concrete Average Daily Traffic:Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Major Arterial PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- & Six- Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project GRAND ISLAND Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 67 / 318 County:City:Village: 2008 5,010 2028 TBD Thickness:Width: X Grading X Concrete X Right of Way X Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter X Utility Adjustments X Shoulder Widen Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing Asphalt X Erosion Control Sidewalk Length: Length: Span:Rise:Length: Length: *County:*City:*State:*Federal:*Other:*Total: Signature:Title:Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- & Six- Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project GRAND ISLAND Design Standard Number:Surfacing Municipal Location Description: Stuhr Rd from just south of BNSF crossing to Bismark Rd Project Description: Concrete overlay with shoulder widening Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphalt Average Daily Traffic:Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Other Arterial PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT New Bridge:Roadway Width:Type: Bridge to Remain in Place:Roadway Width:Type: Box Culvert Type: Culvert Diameter:Type: Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)160 Bridges and Culverts Sized YES N/A Street Superintendent 160*OPTIONAL Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)Project No.: 0.4 Mile M-310(624) Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 68 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item F1 #9422 – Consideration of Correcting Ordinance #9419 Relating to Chapter 36-102 of the Grand Island City Code Staff Contact: chadn Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 69 / 318 Council Agenda Memo From:Chad Nabity, AICP Meeting:March 12, 2013 Subject:Consideration of Correcting Ordinance #9419 Relating to Chapter 36-102 of the Grand Island City Code Item #’s:F-1 Presenter(s):Chad Nabity, Hall County Regional Planning Director Background On January 22, 2013 the Grand Island City Council approved Ordinance #9419 approving changes to Chapter 36 of the Grand Island City code relative to Accessory Building and Uses and Landscaping Requirements. The section of that ordinance changing Section 102 Landscaping were copied from an old version of the Section of Chapter 36 and inadvertently made more changes to the code than intended. In order to correct that error staff has prepared a new ordinance that reflects only those changes that were supposed to be made. Discussion The proposed ordinance will change confirm that the only changes made to Section 102 of Chapter 36 on January 22, 2013 are the changes to landscaping regarding the Airport overlay zone. Alternatives It appears that the Council has the following alternatives concerning the issue at hand. The Council may: 1.Move to approve 2.Refer the issue to a Committee 3.Postpone the issue to future date 4.Take no action on the issue Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 70 / 318 Recommendation City Administration recommends that the Council approve the correction to Ordinance #9419. Sample Motion Move to approve Ordinance #9422. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 71 / 318 Approved as to Form ¤ ___________ March 4, 2013 ¤ City Attorney ORDINANCE NO. 9422 An ordinance to amend Chapter 36 of the Grand Island City Code; specifically, to amend Section 36-102 Landscaping Requirements; to repeal any ordinance or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith; and to provide for publication in pamphlet form and the effective date of this ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA: SECTION 1. Section 36-102 of the Grand Island City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: §36-102. Landscaping Requirements (A) Purpose: The landscaping and screening regulations are intended to improve the physical appearance of the community; to improve the environmental performance of new development by contributing to the abatement of heat, noise, glare, wind and dust; to promote natural percolation of storm water and improvement of air quality; to buffer potentially incompatible uses from one another; and, to protect and enhance the value of property and neighborhoods within the city. (B) Applicability: (1)The provisions of this section shall apply to the following zones: Medium Density Residential Zone, High Density Residential Zone, Residential Office Zone, Light Business Zone, General Business Zone, Arterial Commercial Overlay Zone, Heavy Business Zone, Industrial Estates Zone, Light Manufacturing Zone, Heavy Manufacturing Zone, Commercial Development Zone, Residential Development Zone and Travel Development Zone. Landscaping of lands within districts such as the Central Business District and Fourth Street Business District, as defined in this code, shall be subject to Streetscape Improvement Projects where applicable. In the absence of such projects, the provisions of this section shall apply. (2)The provisions of this section shall apply to the Airport Overlay Zone with the exception that three shrubs may be substituted for each required shade or ornamental tree to conform to standards of wildlife management required near an airport. (3) The provisions of this section shall apply to all new development, including surface parking, on each lot or site upon application for a building permit, except as follows: (a) Reconstruction or replacement of a lawfully existing use or structure. (b) Remodeling, rehabilitation or improvements to existing uses or structures which do not substantially change the location or building footprint of existing structures, or the location and design of parking facilities or other site improvements. However, additions or enlargements of existing uses or structures, which increase floor area or impervious coverage, shall be subject to the provisions of this section, which shall only apply to that portion of the lot or site where the new development or use occurs. (c) Residential structures containing three dwelling units or less shall be exempt from the requirements of this section. (4) Landscaping which exists on any property shall not be altered or reduced below the minimum requirements of this section, unless suitable substitutions are made which meet the requirements of this section, pursuant to a site plan approved by the city. (5) Any conflict between this section and another section of this chapter shall be resolved in favor of the more restrictive provision. (C) Nonconforming Status: Any property or use of property, which as of August 1, 2004 or any amendment hereto is lawfully nonconforming only as to the regulations relating to landscaping, may be continued in the same manner as if the landscaping were conforming. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 72 / 318 ORDINANCE NO. 9422 (Cont.) - 2 - (D) Definitions: The following definitions shall be used for terms contained within this section: Buffer yard: A landscaped area provided to separate and significantly obstruct the view of two adjacent land uses or properties from one another. Canopy tree: A deciduous tree having a minimum mature height of 30 feet and a minimum caliper of 1 inch at the time of planting. One canopy tree equals two understory/ornamental or evergreen trees. Evergreen tree: An evergreen or conifer tree having a minimum mature height of 20 feet and a minimum 2 gallon container size or bare root/ball equivalent at the time of planting. Landscaped area: That area within the boundaries of a given lot consisting primarily of plant material, including but not limited to grass, trees, shrubs, flowers, vines, groundcover and other organic plant materials (this does not include plant materials typically used as a cash crop). Tall varieties of native and ornamental grasses may be planted and left in their natural state in selective and limited locations, deemed appropriate by the city. Inorganic materials such as brick, stones, aggregate, ponds or fountains may be used within landscaped areas, provided that such materials comprise no more than 35 percent of the required landscaped area. Flat concrete or asphalt, other than walkways five feet or less in width, may not be used within a required landscaped area. Minimum equivalent street landscaping: The minimum landscaped area which must be provided in a street yard, expressed as a percent of the total area contained within that street yard. Shrub: A deciduous or evergreen plant having a minimum height of 18 inches at the time of planting, with a maximum mature height of less than 10 feet. Street yard: (1) The area of a lot or parcel which lies between any street property line and the fronting walls of any building or buildings on the parcel. The street yard shall follow all irregularities or indentations in the front wall of the building, excluding minor projections or indentations such as steps or unenclosed porches. For the purposes of defining the street yard area, the front wall shall be extended from the outermost corners of the building, parallel with the fronting street, until intersecting with the side property line [see Attachment B hereto]. Street yard depth shall not exceed 100 feet for the purposes of calculating the minimum equivalent street landscaping area requirement. (2) On lots or parcels with multiple buildings, the street yard area shall be defined by all building front walls having direct, visual frontage onto the street. Any space between buildings equal to 15 percent of the length of such frontage, but in no case more than 100 feet, shall be considered an extension of the continuous building front wall for the purpose of delineating the street yard. Understory/ornamental tree: A flowering or non-flowering deciduous tree having a maximum mature height of 30 feet and a minimum caliper of  inch at the time of planting. (E) Street Yard Landscaping Standards: (1) Street yard landscaping shall be provided adjacent to each street property line and within street yards, as set forth below, in accordance with an approved site landscaping plan. (2) Minimum equivalent street landscaping area: Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 73 / 318 ORDINANCE NO. 9422 (Cont.) - 3 - (Minimum Equivalent Street Landscaping Area Zoning District Percent of Street Yard (%) Minimum Landscaping Depth of Street Yard*** (ft.) R3 65 20 R4 60 10 RO 30 10 B1 25 10 B2 20*10* AC 20 20* B3 20 10* ME 20 20 M1 20 20 M2 20 10 M3 20 10 TD 30 30 CD **30 RD **10 or 30 *Unless otherwise established in an approved Streetscape Improvement Project. **As determined by approved plan (3) When a lot contains more than one street frontage, the area of all street yards and the proposed street yard landscaped areas may be combined for the purposes of determining compliance with this section. (4) Any required street yard landscaping shall include the following minimum shrub and tree plantings (or an appropriate equivalent as determined by the city) for every 100 feet (any fraction of .5 or less rounded to the next lowest number; any fraction exceeding .5 rounded to the next highest number) of property line adjacent to a public street right-of-way: 1 canopy tree; 1 understory/ornamental or evergreen tree; 3 shrubs. Existing trees or shrubs approved for preservation shall be counted toward satisfaction of this provision. (F) Buffer Yard and Parking Landscaping Screening Standards: (1) Buffer yard landscaping shall be installed and maintained adjacent to the affected common side or rear property line(s), when a use is established in a more intensive zoning district located adjacent to a less intensive zoning district, as set forth below: More Intensive Zoning District Required Buffer Yard Width (ft.)* Less Intensive Zoning District RO, B1, B2, AC, B3, CD, TD 10 TA, LLR, R1, R2, R3, R4, RD ME, M1, M2, M3 20 TA, LLR, R1, R2, R3, R4, RO, RD, CD, TD, B1, B2, B2, AC, B3 *When an alley, street or railroad R.O.W. separates adjacent districts requiring a buffer yard, the buffer yard width shall be halved. (2) Buffer yard landscaping is intended to provide screening of loading docks, refuse collection points, truck/equipment parking, sources of noise, glare, light, dust, or other negative impacts. Buffer yard landscaping shall include hedges or screens of evergreen or approved deciduous plant material, capable of providing a substantial opaque barrier, and attaining a minimum height of 6 feet within three years of planting. Opaque fencing may also supplement the vegetative plantings, but shall be installed no closer to the property line than the width of the required buffer yard. (3) Buffer yard landscaping and parking landscaping screening strips shall not be placed on an easement. (4) A parking landscaping screening strip, having a Minimum Landscaping Depth of Street Yard as identified above, shall be installed along any parking area adjacent to a public street right-of-way. No parking area shall contain more than 100 spaces except as allowed within these regulations. If a greater number of parking spaces is required, separate parking areas shall be provided, and shall be separated from other parking areas by landscaped dividing strips, having a minimum width of 6 feet. These strips shall include trees, shrubs, grasses and other vegetative coverings for a creative aesthetic appearance. A parking Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 74 / 318 ORDINANCE NO. 9422 (Cont.) - 4 - landscaping screening strip shall also count towards meeting any requirements associated with minimum equivalent street or buffer yard landscaping. Alternate plans for parking lots with more than 500 spaces may submitted for approval by a committee comprised of the Planning Director, Building Department Director and Public Works Director with recommendations from other appropriate city staff. The Committee shall establish criteria for the review and approval of larger parking lots based on but not limited to the following areas of concern: overall area and types of landscaping provided shall not be less than would be required under the conventional regulations, provision for storm water management and filtering using best available practices, provisions for adequate lighting, fire protection and security throughout the lot, provisions for pedestrian access through and around the lot, and provisions for pedestrian access to the site requiring said parking lot. (5) A development may continue to comply with the buffer yard landscaping requirements in effect at the time of issuance of its initial building permit, regardless of whether an adjacent lot or property is rezoned to a less restrictive zoning district which requires additional buffer yard landscaping. (G) Site Plan Requirements: (1) A site plan showing the required street yard, buffer yard and/or parking screening landscaping shall be submitted to the city for review and approval as part of the application for a building permit. The plan shall include, but not be limited to the following: (a)Location of proposed landscaping drawn to scale. (b)Location, size, type and condition of proposed plant and non-plant landscaping materials including fences, walks, ponds, fountains, benches, lighting and irrigation systems. (c)Estimated date of completion of the installation of all plantings and finishing materials. (H) Installation and Maintenance Requirements: (1) Required landscaping areas shall be installed and maintained in a neat, clean, orderly and healthful condition. Maintenance shall include proper pruning of trees and shrubs, mowing of lawn and grass areas, weeding, removal of litter, fertilizing, replacement of plants consistent with this section when necessary, and the regular watering of all plantings. (2) The installation of landscaping shall be completed prior to the issuance of any occupancy permit for buildings on the property, or commencement of the intended use of the property. (3) If, at the time of commencement of the intended use of the property or application for a certificate of occupancy, any required landscaping has not been installed or completed due to seasonal or climatic conditions or plant material being unavailable, the developer or owner of the property shall submit the following to the Building Department: (a) A request for extension of the proposed completion date for installation of the required landscaping, stating the reason for the request, the property owner's current mailing address, and a commitment to complete the installation of the landscaping by a date certain, not to exceed six months from the building completion date. (b) A drawing showing the plan and layout of the landscaping areas. (c) A cost estimate for the installation of the landscaping area. (d) A bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, cash or other financial surety as may be approved by the City Attorney guaranteeing faithful performance of the owner or developer's commitment to complete installation of the required landscaping and payable to the City of Grand Island in the event that the developer fails to carry out the commitments described in sub-paragraph (a) above. (4) Upon approval of the foregoing request for extension of time to complete the landscaping installation, the owner or developer shall be issued a conditional certificate of occupancy or a conditional letter authorizing commencement of use of the property by the Building Department. The owner or developer shall complete the installation of the landscaping in accordance with the commitments made pursuant to sub-paragraph (a) above, and, upon inspection and approval by the Building Department, a certificate of occupancy or commencement of use letter shall be issued. All limitations on the use of the property relating to landscaping are deemed to be of no force or effect at that time, and the City shall release the surety or other security submitted by the owner or developer. (5) If the owner or developer has not installed the required landscaping with the commitments made pursuant to sub-paragraph (a) above, the owner or developer shall be deemed to have granted the City or its officers, employees, agents or representatives permission to enter upon the property to install the required landscaping in accordance with the plan submitted pursuant to sub-paragraph (c) above using the surety or security filed by the owner or developer as payment for said installation. The Building Department shall send the owner or developer written notice of Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 75 / 318 ORDINANCE NO. 9422 (Cont.) - 5 - default and intention to enter onto the property to install required landscaping by certified mail, return receipt requested, and ordinary first class mail sent to the last known address of said owner or developer at least five (5) business days prior to making such entry. Amended by Ordinance No. 9256, effective 04-07-2010 Amended by Ordinance No. 9419, effective 02-15-2013 SECTION 2. Section 36-102 as existing prior to this amendment, and any ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith, are repealed. SECTION 3. The validity of any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof. SECTION 4. That this ordinance shall be in force and take effect from and after its passage and publication in pamphlet form within 15 days according to law. Enacted: March 12, 2013. ____________________________________ Jay Vavricek, Mayor Attest: ________________________________ RaNae Edwards, City Clerk Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 76 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item G1 Approving Minutes of February 26, 2013 City Council Regular Meeting Staff Contact: RaNae Edwards Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 77 / 318 CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING February 26, 2013 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Island, Nebraska was conducted in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 100 East First Street, on February 26, 2013. Notice of the meeting was given in The Grand Island Independent on February 20, 2013. Mayor Jay Vavricek called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The following City Council members were present: Bob Niemann, Linna Dee Donaldson, Chuck Haase, Julie Hehnke, Mitch Nickerson, John Gericke, Scott Dugan, Mike Paulick, and Vaughn Minton. Councilmember Peg Gilbert was absent. The following City Officials were present: City Administrator Mary Lou Brown, Acting City Clerk Brenda Sutherland, City Attorney Robert Sivick, Interim Public Works Director Terry Brown and Finance Director Jaye Monter. INVOCATION was given by Father Tim Raasch, St. Stephen’s Episcopal Church, 422 West 2nd Street and Dan Naranjo, All Faiths Funeral Home, 2929 South Locust Street followed by the PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. Mayor Vavricek introduced Community Youth Council member Rebecca Riley, a sophomore at Grand Island Central Catholic and adult sponsor Jennifer Cramer. PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS: Presentation of the “Mayor’s Builder Award” to Fonner Park. Mayor Vavricek presented the “Mayor’s Builder Award” to Fonner Park. Executive Director Hugh Minor was present and gave a history of Fonner Park. Recognition of the Grand Island Senior High Wrestling Team for Class “A” State Wrestling Championship. Mayor Vavricek and the City Council recognized Grand Island Senior High Wrestling Team and their coach Mike Schadwinkel for their Class “A” State wrestling championship. The coach introduced members of the Wrestling team. RESOLUTIONS: #2013-54 – Consideration of Honorary Naming of Capital Avenue; Broadwell Avenue to Webb Road – “Veterans Memorial Avenue”. Interim Public Works Director Terry Brown reported that a request had been made to have the section of Capital Avenue from Broadwell Avenue to Webb Road be given the honorary name of “Veterans Memorial Avenue”. Members from the public that asked to speak on the topic were as follows: Dave Ziola, 1925 W. 11th, Grand Island, NE, Gary Quandt, 609 W. 14th, Grand Island, NE Marlan Ferguson, 2808 Apache Rd., Grand Island, NE Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 78 / 318 Page 2, City Council Regular Meeting, February 26, 2013 In addition, The Mayor asked Cindy Johnson from The Chamber of Commerce to join Marlan Ferguson in his comments and also Pam Lancaster from the County Board. All spoke in favor. Motion by Gericke, second by Niemann to approve Resolution #2013-54. Upon roll call vote, all voted aye. Motion adopted. ORDINANCE: Councilmember Niemann moved “that the statutory rules requiring ordinances to be read by title on three different days are suspended and that ordinances numbered: #9421 – Consideration of Creation of Storm Sewer Improvement District No. 2013-1, Summerfield Subdivisions be considered for passage on the same day upon reading by number only and that the City Clerk be permitted to call out the number of these ordinances on second reading and then upon final passage and call for a roll call vote on each reading and then upon final passage.” Councilmember Nickerson seconded the motion. Upon roll call vote, all voted aye. Motion adopted. Interim Public Works Director Terry Brown reported that the developer of the Summerfield Subdivision has a desire to move forward with selling other lots in the subdivision for development. Drainage has been an issue in this subdivision as backwater from Moores Creek has caused damage to homeowner property and before he moved forward with the rest of the project there was an interest in creating the storm sewer improvement district to alleviate the problem. The cost to the homeowner would be $500 and could be spread over seven years. A presentation was made by Matt Rief of Olsson and Associates. Matt has been the project manager/engineer who has worked on this project for years. Members of the public who spoke in support of the topic were as follows: Greg Baxter, 2121 Monitor Rd., Grand Island, NE (developer) Bob Arends, 1542 Warbler Circle, Grand Island, NE Maurice Grudzinski, 3903 Partridge Circle, Grand Island, NE Buhrl Gilpin, 3904 Partridge Circle, Grand Island, NE Members of the public who spoke in opposition were as follows: Catherine Kenna, 3841 Meadowlark Circle, Grand Island, NE Michelle Brisnehan, 3927 Partridge Circle, Grand Island, NE David Willis, 1609 Summerfield Ave., Grand Island, NE was neutral to this topic but wanted information about how it would affect his property. Motion by Nickerson to approve Ordinance #9421 – died for lack of a second. Motion by Dugan, second by Hehnke to deny Ordinance #9421. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 79 / 318 Page 3, City Council Regular Meeting, February 26, 2013 City Clerk: Ordinance #9421 on first reading. All those in favor of the passage of this ordinance on first reading, answer roll call vote. Upon roll call vote, Councilmembers Minton, Dugan, Gericke, Nickerson, Hehnke, Haase, Donaldson, and Niemann voted aye. Councilmember Paulick voted no. Motion adopted. CONSENT AGENDA: Consent Agenda items G-6 and G-10 were removed from the agenda for further discussion. Motion by Donaldson, second by Niemann to approve the Consent Agenda excluding items G-6 and G-10. Upon roll call vote, all voted aye. Motion adopted. Approving Minutes of February 12, 2013 City Council Regular Meeting. Approving Minutes of February 19, 2013 City Council Study Session/Special Meeting. Approving Appointment of Michael Corman to South Locust Business Improvement District 2012. Approving Appointment of Ryan Waind to Business Improvement District #6. #2013-47 – Approving Bid Award for Water Main Project 2013-W-1 – Clark Street at the Union Pacific Railroad Tracks with Van Kirk Brothers Construction of Sutton, NE in an Amount of $79,798.50. #2013-48 – Approving Contract for Concession Stand Operations at the Veterans Athletic Field Complex with Rathjen & Son Enterprises, Inc. dba The Snow of Grand Island, NE for three years. Parks and Recreation Director Todd McCoy reported that proposal had been received in January for the concession stand operations at the Veterans Athletic Field Complex. One proposal had been received which met the requirements of the proposal. The Snow had the contract last year and staff recommended approving the contract for another three years. Discussion was held concerning improvements of the building by The Snow. Henry Rathjen answered questions on the improvements they planned to make. Motion by Dugan, second by Nickerson to approve Resolution #2013-48. Upon roll call vote, all voted aye. Motion adopted. #2013-49 – Approving Bid Award for Golf Course Irrigation Variable Frequency Drive with The Sprinkler Company of Stanton, NE in an Amount of $43,599.98. #2013-50 – Approving State Bid Award for (1) 2013 2500 HD Chevrolet Silverado 4x4 Pickup for the Streets Division of the Public Works Department with Husker Auto Group of Lincoln, NE in an Amount of $44,033.00. #2013-51 – Approving State Bid Award for (1) 2013 F-150 Ford 4x2 Pickup for the Streets Division of the Public Works Department with Sid Dillon of Crete, NE in an Amount of $20,621.00. #2013-52 – Approving Extension of Residency Requirement Date for Fire Chief Cory Schmidt. City Administrator Mary Lou Brown reported that the City Personnel Rules required Department Directors to live within 12 miles of the city limits within six months of their hiring date. Fire Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 80 / 318 Page 4, City Council Regular Meeting, February 26, 2013 Chief Schmidt was hired on October 1, 2012 and his six months would be up on April 1, 2013. He is in the process of building a new home north of Grand Island and requested an extension of six months to meet the residency requirement. Comments were made by a few Councilmembers of the importance of Department Directors living in Grand Island and being part of the community. Motion by Haase to deny Resolution #2013-52. Motion died due to lack of a second. Motion by Nickerson, second by Minton to approve Resolution #2013-52. Upon roll call vote, Councilmembers Minton, Paulick, Gericke, Nickerson, Haase, and Niemann voted aye. Councilmembers Dugan, Hehnke, and Donaldson voted no. Motion adopted. #2013-53 – Approving Supplemental Agreement No. 1 with NDOR and Olsson Associates for Engineering Consulting Services Related to Capital Avenue Widening – Webb Road to Broadwell Avenue. #2013-55 – Approving Bid Award for (15) Protective Transport Systems with Jack’s Uniform and Equipment of South Sioux City, IA in an Amount of $24,009.97. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS: Motion by Dugan, second by Nickerson to approve the Claims for the period of February 13, 2013 through February 26, 2013, for a total amount of $4,969,958.09. Unanimously approved. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 9:48 p.m. Brenda Sutherland Acting City Clerk Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 81 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item G2 Approving Minutes of March 5, 2013 City Council Study Session Staff Contact: RaNae Edwards Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 82 / 318 CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION March 5, 2013 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a Study Session of the City Council of the City of Grand Island, Nebraska was conducted in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 100 East First Street, on March 5, 2013. Notice of the meeting was given in the Grand Island Independent on February 27, 2013. Mayor Jay Vavricek called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The following Councilmembers were present: Scott Dugan, John Gericke, Mitch Nickerson, Chuck Haase, and Bob Niemann. Councilmembers Peg Gilbert, Vaughn Minton, Mike Paulick, Julie Hehnke, and Linna Dee Donaldson were absent. The following City Officials were present: City Administrator Mary Lou Brown, City Clerk RaNae Edwards, City Attorney Robert Sivick, and Finance Director Jaye Monter. INVOCATION was given by Community Youth Council member Emma Kreutzer followed by the PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. Mayor Vavricek introduced CYC member Emma Kreutzer. SPECIAL ITEMS: Presentation by Almquist, Maltzahn, Galloway, & Luth for Fiscal Year 2012 City Single Audit and General Purpose Financial Statements and Electric and Water Audit Reports. Finance Director Jaye Monter introduced Terry Galloway representing Almquist, Maltzahn, Galloway, & Luth who presented a PowerPoint presentation on the Fiscal Year 2012 Audit. He stated they were giving the City a clean opinion and complimented the City on their finances. Grand Island’s Outstanding Debt decreased by $10,046,377 (18.8%) during the current fiscal year due to scheduled principal payments. Total net assets were $601,335,686. Discussion was held concerning the adjustment from restricted to unrestricted cash and net assets in the amount of $956,305 for the landfill. The need for the closure/post closure liability was $3,054,567. Currently $4,010,872 was set aside for the closure/post closure. Landfill Superintendent Jeff Waiter answered questions concerning the life of the landfill. Currently Phase 1 was 35 years, but they had the capacity for 100 years. Mr. Galloway stated there was $1 million in excess. Net assets were increased $3,191,337 as of September 30, 2011, to reflect City infrastructure paid for directly by the State of Nebraska. Business-type net assets were increased and discretely presented component unit net assets were decreased $8,854,061 to reclassify the landfill from a component unit to an Enterprise Fund. Reviewed was the budgetary comparison schedule. Total general government was under budget $240,374, public safety was under budget $1,109,731, public works was under budget $362,783, environment and leisure was under budget $116,971 and non-departmental was under budget Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 83 / 318 Page 2, City Council Study Session, March 5, 2013 $404,326 for a total under budget amount of $2,234,185. Personnel and equipment were the reasons these funds were not spent. Comments were made about budget authority and using the money that was budgeted if needed. City Administrator Mary Lou Brown mentioned most of the savings was in open personnel positions. She stated she would be sitting down with the Department Director’s to more closely monitor their budget needs. Cash reserves were at 30.69% for 2012 which was the level they needed to be. Mr. Galloway stated we were in great financial shape in the General Fund and our outstanding debt was very good at 0.76%. The top 5 sources of revenues were: sales tax; property taxes; grants and contributions; state allocation; and charges for services. Levy rates were reviewed over the last eight years with the 2012 levy rate at 0.324425. Governmental expenses per capita based on 48,520 population were as follows: General Government - $75; Public Safety - $347; Public Works - $116; and Environment and Leisure - $107. Mr. Galloway stated the City was better off today than they were a year ago and it was the best report he had ever given to the City. Ms. Brown complimented the Finance staff for the work they had done. Scott Kuehl, 1419 Independence Avenue spoke in opposition of transferring funds from the Fire Reserve to the General Fund because of State, Federal and IRS rules. He stated the Police and Fire funds should be kept separate. Ms. Monter stated the City was currently funding General Fund Firefighter employer contributions to the defined contribution plans with the excess contributions in the Fire Reserve 810 Fund. Pending Council approval, the following funding uses were under consideration: General Fund contributions in fiscal year 2013 for the two recent pre-84 Police retirees as well as future pre-84 Police retirees Future pension disability payments for both Police Officers and Firefighters General Fund Police Officer employer contributions to the defined contribution plans ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:20 p.m. RaNae Edwards City Clerk Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 84 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item G3 #2013-56 - Approving Acquisition of Utility Easement - 2703 East Highway 30 - CMJ Rentals This item relates to the aforementioned Public Hearing item E-1. Staff Contact: Tim Luchsinger, Utilities Director Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 85 / 318 Approved as to Form ¤ ___________ March 8, 2013 ¤ City Attorney R E S O L U T I O N 2013-56 WHEREAS, a public utility easement is required by the City of Grand Island, from CMJ Rentals, to survey, construct, inspect, maintain, repair, replace, relocate, extend, remove, and operate thereon, public utilities and appurtenances, including lines and transformers; and; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on March 12, 2013, for the purpose of discussing the proposed acquisition of an easement located in the City of Grand Island, Hall County, Nebraska; and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at Southeast corner of Lot Two (2) Riffel Subdivision; thence northerly along the westerly line of Lot Two (2) said Riffel Subdivision, a distance of seventy five (75.0) feet to the ACTUAL Point of Beginning; thence deflecting right 32º28’07” and running in a northeasterly direction, a distance of one hundred sixty two (162.0) feet to the point of termination. The side lines of the above described tract shall be prolonged or shortened as required to terminate on the boundary of Grantor’s property. The above-described easement and right-of-way containing 0.07 acres, more or less, as shown on the plat dated 2/12/2013, marked Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA, that the City of Grand Island be, and hereby is, authorized to acquire a public utility easement from CMJ Rentals, on the above- described tract of land. - - - Adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Island, Nebraska, March 12, 2013. _______________________________________ Jay Vavricek, Mayor Attest: _______________________________________ RaNae Edwards, City Clerk Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 86 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 87 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item G4 #2013-57 - Approving Bid Award - 2013 Truck Chassis with Service Crane Body & Tip-Mounted Capstan - Underground Division Staff Contact: Tim Luchsinger,Stacy Nonhof Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 88 / 318 Council Agenda Memo From:Timothy Luchsinger, Utilities Director Stacy Nonhof, City Attorney Meeting:March 12, 2013 Subject:2013 Truck Chassis with Service Crane, Body and Tip- Mounted Capstan (Unit #1672) - Underground Division Item #’s:G-4 Presenter(s):Timothy Luchsinger, Utilities Director Background The Utilities Department, Underground Division, has a 1994 truck (Unit #1672) with 95,000 miles and a service body that is at the end of its life expectancy. In addition to the mileage, the engine also has considerable unmetered operating time for an auxiliary generator to support jobsite work requirements. Discussion Specifications for replacement of Unit #1672 were prepared by Department Staff, advertised in accordance with the City Purchasing Code, sent to four potential bidders, and posted on the City’s Web Site. The bids were publically opened on February 13, 2013. Two bids were received as tabulated below. The budgeted amount for this replacement vehicle was $115,000. Bidder Exceptions Make of the Vehicle Bid Price Palfleet Truck Equipment Council Bluffs, IA Noted Ford $ 96,390.00 Hansen International Truck, Inc. Grand Island, NE Noted International $113,169.00 The bids were reviewed by Utility Department staff. Both trucks have exceptions to the specifications: Palfleet Truck Equipment – The crane rating is less than specified, but the lifting capacity and boom extension are in excess of those specified. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 89 / 318 Hansen International – A 6.4 liter engine with a five speed transmission was bid instead of the specified 6.7 liter engine with a six speed transmission. All other exceptions to both trucks are minor and are acceptable. Department staff recommends that the 2013 Truck Chassis with Service Crane Body and Tip-Mounted Capstan from Palfleet Truck Equipment of Council Bluffs, Iowa, in the amount of $96,390.00 as the lowest bid for the replacement unit for the Underground Division’s Unit 1672. Alternatives It appears that the Council has the following alternatives concerning the issue at hand. The Council may: 1.Move to approve 2.Refer the issue to a Committee 3.Postpone the issue to future date 4.Take no action on the issue Recommendation City Administration recommends that the Council approve the purchase of the 2013 Truck Chassis with Service Crane, Body and Tip-Mounted Capstan (Unit 1672) for the Underground Division, from Palfleet Truck Equipment, of Council Bluffs, Iowa, in the amount of $96,390.00. Sample Motion Move to approve the purchase of a 2013 Truck Chassis with Service Crane, Body and Tip-Mounted Capstan (Unit #1672) from Palfleet Truck Equipment, of Council Bluffs, Iowa, in the amount of $96,390.00. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 90 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 91 / 318 Purchasing Division of Legal Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Working Together for a Better Tomorrow, Today BID OPENING BID OPENING DATE:February 13, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. FOR:2013 Truck Chassis w/Service Crane Body & Tip-Mounted Capstan DEPARTMENT:Utilities ESTIMATE:$115,000.00 FUND/ACCOUNT:520 PUBLICATION DATE:January 21, 2013 NO. POTENTIAL BIDDERS:4 SUMMARY Bidder:Palfleet Truck Equipment Hansen International Truck, Inc. Council Bluffs, IA Grand Island, NE Exceptions:Noted Noted Make:Ford International Bid Price:$96,390.00 $113,169.00 cc:Tim Luchsinger, Utilities Director Bob Smith, Assist. Utilities Director Mary Lou Brown, City Administrator Pat Gericke, Utilities Admin. Assist. Randy Leiser, Elec. Underground Supt. P1610 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 92 / 318 Approved as to Form ¤ ___________ March 8, 2013 ¤ City Attorney R E S O L U T I O N 2013-57 WHEREAS, the City of Grand Island invited sealed bids for a 2013 Truck Chassis with Service Crane Body and Tip-Mounted Capstan, according to plans and specifications on file with the Utilities Department; and WHEREAS, on February 13, 2013, bids were received, opened and reviewed; and WHEREAS, Palfleet Truck Equipment of Council Bluffs, Iowa, submitted a bid in accordance with the terms of the advertisement for bids and plans and specifications and all other statutory requirements contained therein, such proposal being in the amount of $96,390.00; and WHEREAS, the bid of Palfleet Truck Equipment is less than the estimate for the 2013 Truck Chassis with Service Crane Body and Tip-Mounted Capstan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA, that the bid of Palfleet Truck Equipment in the amount of $96,390.00, for a 2013 Truck Chassis with Service Crane Body and Tip-Mounted Capstan, is hereby approved as the lowest bid. - - - Adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Island, Nebraska, March 12, 2013. _______________________________________ Jay Vavricek, Mayor Attest: _______________________________________ RaNae Edwards, City Clerk Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 93 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item G5 #2013-58 - Approving Bid Award - Vacuum, Blast Cleaning, High Pressure Wash - Platte Generating Station Staff Contact: Tim Luchsinger, Stacy Nonhof Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 94 / 318 Council Agenda Memo From:Timothy G. Luchsinger, Utilities Director Stacy Nonhof, Assistant City Attorney Meeting Date:March 12, 2013 Subject:Vacuum, Blast Cleaning and High Pressure Wash – Spring Outage 2013 Item #’s:G-5 Presenter(s):Timothy G. Luchsinger, Utilities Director Background The electrostatic precipitator at the Platte Generating Station is the air quality control equipment used to remove coal ash particulates from the plant’s boiler flue gas stream. Proper performance of this equipment is required as part of the plant’s operating permit. Due to volume and characteristics of the coal ash, the precipitator must be grit blasted twice a year to remove ash build-up to allow the plant to remain below permitted emission levels. In addition to maintaining performance, removal of the ash deposits also allows an inspection of the precipitator internal surfaces and components. The next outage is scheduled for April of this year. Specifications were developed by the plant maintenance staff to include grit blasting of the electrostatic precipitator, bulk vacuuming of the associated ductwork and hoppers and high pressure water wash of the bottom ash system. Discussion The specifications for the Vacuum, Blast Cleaning and High Pressure Wash-Spring Outage 2013 were advertised and issued for bid in accordance with the City Purchasing Code. Bids were publicly opened on February 19, 2013. Specifications were sent to four potential bidders and responses were received as listed below. The base engineer’s estimate for this project was $100,000.00. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 95 / 318 Bidder Base Bid Tax Total Bid Meylan Enterprises, Inc. Omaha, NE $ 67,800 $ 4,657.95 $ 72,457.95 W-S Industrial Services, Inc. Council Bluffs, IA $ 79,249 $ 5,547.42 $ 87,796.43 Graycor Blasting Oakbrook Terrace, IL $ 192,854 $13,499.00 $206,353.00 The bidders listed no exceptions to the specification. The bid from Meylan Enterprises, Inc. is compliant with specifications and the base bid is within the engineer’s estimate. Alternatives It appears that the Council has the following alternatives concerning the issue at hand. The Council may: 1.Move to approve 2.Refer the issue to a Committee 3.Postpone the issue to future date 4.Take no action on the issue Recommendation City Administration recommends that the Council award the Contract for Vacuum, Blast Cleaning and High Pressure Wash - Spring Outage 2013, to Meylan Enterprises, Inc., of Omaha, Nebraska, as the low responsive bidder, with the total bid price (including taxes), of $72,457.95. Sample Motion Move to approve the bid (including taxes) of $72,457.95, from Meylan Enterprises, Inc., for the Vacuum, Blast Cleaning and High Pressure Wash - Spring Outage 2013. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 96 / 318 Purchasing Division of Legal Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Jason Eley, Purchasing Agent Working Together for a Better Tomorrow, Today BID OPENING BID OPENING DATE:February 19, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. FOR:Vacuum, Blast Cleaning and High Pressure Wash – Spring Outage 2013 DEPARTMENT:Utilities ESTIMATE:$100,000.00 FUND/ACCOUNT:520 PUBLICATION DATE:January 31, 2013 NO. POTENTIAL BIDDERS:4 SUMMARY Bidder:W-S Industrial Services, Inc.Graycor Blasting Company Council Bluffs, IA Oakbrook Terrace, IL Bid Security:Merchants Bonding Company Federal Insurance Company Exceptions:None None Bid Price: Precipitator Blast:$42,052.00 $145,588.00 Vacuum Services:$18,747.00 $ 24,146.00 Water Blasting:$18,450.00 $ 23,120.00 Sales Tax:$ 5,547.42 $ 13,499.00 Total Bid:$87,796.43 $206,353.00 Bidder:Meylan Enterprises, Inc. Omaha, NE Bid Security:Universal Surety Company Exceptions:None Bid Price: Precipitator Blast:$26,500.00 Vacuum Services:$21,850.00 Water Blasting:$19,450.00 Sales Tax:$14,657.95 Total Bid:$72.457.95 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 97 / 318 cc:Tim Luchsinger, Utilities Director Bob Smith, Assist. Utilities Director Darrell Dorsey, PGS Superintendent Pat Gericke, Utilities Admin. Assist. Karen Nagel, Utility Secretary P1613 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 98 / 318 Approved as to Form ¤ ___________ March 8, 2013 ¤ City Attorney R E S O L U T I O N 2013-58 WHEREAS, the City of Grand Island invited sealed bids for Vacuum, Blast Cleaning and High Pressure Wash at the Platte Generating Station, according to plans and specifications on file with the Utilities Department; and WHEREAS, on February 19, 2013, bids were received, opened and reviewed; and WHEREAS, Meylan Enterprises, Inc., of Omaha, Nebraska, submitted a bid in accordance with the terms of the advertisement of bids and plans and specifications and all other statutory requirements contained therein, such bid being in the amount of $72,457.95; and WHEREAS, the bid of Meylan Enterprises, Inc., is less than the estimate for the Vacuum, Blast Cleaning and High Pressure Wash at the Platte Generating Station NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA, that the bid of Meylan Enterprises, in the amount of $72,457.95 for Vacuum, Blast Cleaning and High Pressure Wash at the Platte Generating Station is hereby approved as the lowest responsible bid. - - - Adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Island, Nebraska, March 12, 2013. _______________________________________ Jay Vavricek, Mayor Attest: _______________________________________ RaNae Edwards, City Clerk Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 99 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item G6 #2013-59 - Approving Amendment #1 to the Plan Review Agreement between the City of Grand Island and NE Dept. of Health & Human Services Staff Contact: Tim Luchsinger, Stacy Nonhof Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 100 / 318 Council Agenda Memo From:Tim Luchsinger, Utilities Director Stacy Nonhof, City Attorney Meeting:March 12, 2013 Subject: Agreement between the City of Grand Island and the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services – Amendment No. 1 Item #’s:G- Presenter(s):Tim Luchsinger, Utilities Director Background The Utilities Department operates under the authority of a license granted by the State of Nebraska, Division of Public Health of the Department of Health and Human Services. The State establishes operating rules and regulations for all public water systems under Title 179, Public Water Systems. Chapter 2 of Title 179 was revised on April 4, 2010. Prior to April 4, 2010, the City of Grand Island had the authority to extend water mains within its established service area by its own authority. City engineering staff developed and enforced specifications in accordance with the State’s Title 179 requirements and used those specifications for all City water distribution system extensions and additions. Historically, major system expansions, such as transmission line to the City Wellfield or the recent system extension to Alda, required that the design specifications and drawings be sent to the state for review and approval. As of the April 4, 2010 revisions to Title 179, not only major expansions but all water system extensions and additions must now be submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for review and approval. The authority of the local jurisdiction to design, review and approve the routine water system extensions has been removed. Included in the April 4, 2010 regulatory changes is a program for larger water systems that allow local jurisdictions to retain approval authority for most of their water system extension projects. The program requires the local water system to make a one-time submittal of its standard specifications for review and approval in accordance with an agreement between the parties. This program was initiated in 2010 between the Utilities Department and HHS for three years and is now subject to renewal. A copy of a proposed amendment which will allow renewal of the original agreement is attached. If approved by the parties, the local water system is authorized, for a three year period, to Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 101 / 318 conduct the required reviews of water system extension projects. Application to HHS for the review agreement authorization includes submittal of a fee of $900.00, and an annual review fee of $900.00 for the term of the Amendment. Discussion Review fees for projects that have been submitted to the State often exceed $1,000.00 per project and for the last four years, the number of water main projects has averaged thirteen per year. The Utilities Department has the personnel and expertise on staff to comply with the State program without additional expense. Alternatives It appears that the Council has the following alternatives concerning the issue at hand. The Council may: 1.Move to approve 2.Refer the issue to a Committee 3.Postpone the issue to future date 4.Take no action on the issue Recommendation City Administration recommends that the Council approve the Agreement between the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services and the City of Grand Island, and authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement. Sample Motion Make a motion to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement between the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services and the City of Grand Island. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 102 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 103 / 318 Approved as to Form ¤ ___________ March 8, 2013 ¤ City Attorney R E S O L U T I O N 2013- WHEREAS, the City of Grand Island Water Department operates under the authority of a license granted by the State of Nebraska, Division of Public Health of the Department of Health and Human Services; and WHEREAS, the State establishes operating rules and regulations for all public water systems under Title 179, Public Water Systems; and WHEREAS, the City of Grand Island has entered into an Agreement with the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services that allows the City to use approved standard plans for water main projects; and WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1 to the original Agreement has been written between the City of Grand Island and the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services to continue until April 27, 2016 for water main project plans review pursuant to Chapter 2 of Title 179, Public Water Systems. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA, that Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement between the City of Grand Island and the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, is hereby approved. - - - Adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Island, Nebraska, March 12, 2013. _______________________________________ Jay Vavricek, Mayor Attest: _______________________________________ RaNae Edwards, City Clerk Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 104 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item G7 #2013-60 - Approving Bid Award for Blaine Street Paving; Project No. 2012-P-2 - Wildwood Drive to Schimmer Drive Staff Contact: Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 105 / 318 Council Agenda Memo From:Keith Kurz, Public Works Engineer Meeting:March 12, 2013 Subject:Approving Bid Award for Blaine Street Paving; Project No. 2012-P-2 – Wildwood Drive to Schimmer Drive Item #’s:G-7 Presenter(s):Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Background On February 14, 2013 the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department advertised for bids for Blaine Street Paving; Project No. 2012-P-2 – Wildwood Drive to Schimmer Drive. There were 5 potential bidders for the project. Discussion Five (5) bids were received and opened on March 1, 2013. The bids were submitted in compliance with the contract, plans, and specifications. A summary of the bids is shown below. Bidder Exceptions Total Bid Gehring Construction & Ready Mix Co. of Columbus, NE None Base Bid - $549,482.30 Alternate #1 - $39,047.60 The Diamond Engineering Co. of Grand Island, NE None Base Bid - $630,854.60 Alternate #1 - $36,250.16 A & R Construction Co. of Plainview, NE None Base Bid - $639,734.45 Alternate #1 - $49,926.80 Blessing Construction of Kearney, NE None Base Bid - $721,184.25 Alternate #1 – 42,544.40 Dobson Brothers Construction of Lincoln, NE None Base Bid - $767,997.10 Alternate #1 - $38,206.00 The Grand Island Area Economic Development Corporation requested to reallocate the $575,000.00 of LB840 funds to allow for paving of Blaine Street, from Wildwood Drive to Schimmer Drive. This reallocation was approved on February 12, 2013, by Resolution Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 106 / 318 No. 2013-39. The LB840 funds will be combined with the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) as a match to the City funds to fully fund this paving project. Alternatives It appears that the Council has the following alternatives concerning the issue at hand. The Council may: 1.Move to approve 2.Refer the issue to a Committee 3.Postpone the issue to future date 4.Take no action on the issue Recommendation City Administration recommends that the Council approve awarding a contract to Gehring Construction & Ready Mix Company of Columbus, Nebraska in the amount of $588,529.90 as the low compliant bid that meets specifications. Sample Motion Move to approve the bid award. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 107 / 318 Purchasing Division of Legal Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Working Together for a Better Tomorrow, Today BID OPENING BID OPENING DATE:March 1, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. FOR:Blaine Street Paving Project No. 2012-P-2 Wildwood Drive to Schimmer Drive DEPARTMENT:Public Works ESTIMATE:$1.2 million FUND/ACCOUNT:25111621-74360-25211 PUBLICATION DATE:February 14, 2013 NO. POTENTIAL BIDDERS:5 SUMMARY Bidder:Blessing Construction The Diamond Engineering Co. Kearney, NE Grand Island, NE Bid Security:Granite Re, Inc.Universal Surety Co. Exceptions:None None Base Bid:$721,184.25 $630,854.60 Alternate #1:$ 42,544.40 $ 36,250.16 Bidder:A & R Construction Co.Gehring Construction & Ready Mix Co. Plainview, NE Columbus, NE Bid Security:Universal Surety Co.Universal Surety Co. Exceptions:None None Base Bid:$639,734.45 $549,482.30 Alternate #1:$ 49,926.80 $ 39,047.60 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 108 / 318 Bidder:Dobson Brothers Construction Lincoln, NE Bid Security:Granite Re, Inc. Exceptions:None Base Bid:$767,997.10 Alternate #1:$ 38,206.00 cc:Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Catrina DeLosh, PW Admin. Assist. Mary Lou Brown, City Administrator Keith Kurz, PW Engineer P1618 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 109 / 318 Approved as to Form ¤ ___________ March 8, 2013 ¤ City Attorney R E S O L U T I O N 2013-60 WHEREAS, the City of Grand Island invited sealed bids for Blaine Street Paving; Project No. 2012-P-2 – Wildwood Drive to Schimmer Drive, according to plans and specifications on file with the City Engineer/Public Works Director; and WHEREAS, on March 1, 2013 bids were received, opened, and reviewed; and WHEREAS, Gehring Construction & Ready Mix Co. of Columbus, Nebraska submitted a bid in accordance with the terms of the advertisement of bids and plans and specifications and all other statutory requirements contained therein, such bid being in the amount of $588,529.90; and WHEREAS, Gehring Construction & Ready Mix Co.’s bid was below the engineer’s estimate for the project: and WHEREAS, $575,000.00 of LB840 funds will be combined with a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) as a match to the City funds to fully fund this paving project NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA, that the bid of Gehring Construction & Ready Mix Co. of Columbus, Nebraska in the amount of $588,529.90 for Blaine Street Paving; Project No. 2012-P-2 – Wildwood Drive to Schimmer Drive is hereby approved as the lowest responsible bid. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract with such contractor for such project on behalf of the City of Grand Island. - - - Adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Island, Nebraska, March 12, 2013. _______________________________________ Jay Vavricek, Mayor Attest: _______________________________________ RaNae Edwards, City Clerk Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 110 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item G8 #2013-61 - Approving Bid Award for the 2013 Chip Seal Project No. 2013-CS-1 Staff Contact: Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 111 / 318 Council Agenda Memo From:Scott Griepenstroh, Public Works Project Manager Meeting:March 12, 2013 Subject:Approving Bid Award for the 2013 Chip Seal Project No. 2013-CS-1 Item #’s:G-8 Presenter(s):Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Background All agreements must be approved by the City Council. Chip seals are constructed by evenly spraying emulsified (liquefied) asphaltic materials onto an existing pavement and then embedding finely graded aggregate (rocks) into it. The aggregate is evenly distributed over the emulsified asphaltic, then rolled into a smooth pavement surface. A chip seal is a cost effective preventive maintenance strategy. When applied at the right time, a chip seal preserves the pavement from advanced deterioration because it seals small cracks, inhibits water intrusion and provides a new riding surface. Chip seals, along with other preventive maintenance strategies, can extend the performance and life of a pavement, resulting in lower life cycle costs. Public Works staff attained technical expertise and experience from Nebraska Department of Roads Engineering and Maintenance personnel to develop specifications for chip seals on our urban streets. These specifications require select manufactured aggregates and higher grade emulsified asphalt to assure successful aggregate adhesion and extended performance. On February 18, 2013 the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department advertised for bids for the 2013 Chip Seal Project No. 2013-CS-1. There were 6 potential bidders for the project. This year’s work involves chip sealing on the following City streets. Section #1. Southbound driving lanes, and left turn bays, of South Locust Street from approximately ¾ miles south of US Highway 34 to approximately ½ mile north of Interstate 80. The inside 3’ shoulder and the outside 8’ shoulders shall be treated with a double application of fog seal. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 112 / 318 Section #2. The on and off ramps at the US Highway 281 and Nebraska Highway 2 Interchange. No treatment will be required for the shoulders of the ramps. Discussion Two (2) bids were received and opened on March 5, 2013. The bid was submitted in compliance with the contract, plans, and specifications. A summary of the bid is shown below. Bidder Exceptions Total Bid Gary Smith Construction Co., Inc. of Grand Island, NE None $104,020.00 Sta-bilt Construction Co. of Harlan, IA None $126,021.00 There are sufficient funds in Account No. 10033506.85351 to fund this project. Alternatives It appears that the Council has the following alternatives concerning the issue at hand. The Council may: 1.Move to approve 2.Refer the issue to a Committee 3.Postpone the issue to future date 4.Take no action on the issue Recommendation City Administration recommends that the Council approve awarding a contract to Gary Smith Construction Co., Inc. of Grand Island, Nebraska in the amount of $104.020.00 as the low compliant bid that meets specifications. Sample Motion Move to approve the bid award. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 113 / 318 Purchasing Division of Legal Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Stacy Nonhof, Purchasing Agent Working Together for a Better Tomorrow, Today BID OPENING BID OPENING DATE:March 5, 2013 at 2:15 p.m. FOR:Chip Seal Project No. 2013-CS-1 DEPARTMENT:Public Works ESTIMATE:$140,000.00 FUND/ACCOUNT:10033506-85351 PUBLICATION DATE:February 18, 2013 NO. POTENTIAL BIDDERS:6 SUMMARY Bidder:Sta-bilt Construction Co.Gary Smith Const. Co., Inc. Harlan, IA Grand Island, NE Bid Security:Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Island Insurance Co. Exceptions:None None Bid Price:$126,021.00 $104,020.00 cc:John Collins, Public Works Director Catrina DeLosh, PW Admin. Assist. Mary Lou Brown, City Administrator Terry Brown, PW Engineer Stacy Nonhof, Purchasing Agent P1619 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 114 / 318 Approved as to Form ¤ ___________ March 8, 2013 ¤ City Attorney R E S O L U T I O N 2013-61 WHEREAS, the City of Grand Island invited sealed bids for Chip Seal Project No. 2013-CS-1, according to plans and specifications on file with the City Engineer/Public Works Director; and WHEREAS, on March 5, 2013 bids were received, opened, and reviewed; and WHEREAS, Gary Smith Construction Co., Inc. of Grand Island, Nebraska submitted a bid in accordance with the terms of the advertisement of bids and plans and specifications and all other statutory requirements contained therein, such bid being in the amount of $104,020.00; and WHEREAS, Gary Smith Construction Co., Inc.’s bid was below the engineer’s estimate for the project: and WHEREAS, funds are available in the Fiscal Year 2012/2013 budget for this project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA, that the bid of Gary Smith Construction Co., Inc. of Grand Island, Nebraska in the amount of $104,020.00 for Chip Seal Project 2013- CS-1 is hereby approved as the lowest responsible bid. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract with such contractor for such project on behalf of the City of Grand Island. - - - Adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Island, Nebraska, March 12, 2013. _______________________________________ Jay Vavricek, Mayor Attest: _______________________________________ RaNae Edwards, City Clerk Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 115 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item G9 #2013-62 - Approving Bid Award for Handicap Ramp Project No. 2013-1 Staff Contact: Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 116 / 318 Council Agenda Memo From:Scott Griepenstroh, Public Works Project Manager Meeting:March 12, 2013 Subject:Approving Bid Award for Handicap Ramp Project No. 2013-1 Item #’s:G-9 Presenter(s):Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Background On February 18, 2013 the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department advertised for bids for the construction of handicap ramps at various intersections in the City. The City is required to have a planned schedule for upgrading public sidewalk ramps to conform to American with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards. The current schedule and budget will bring the City into compliance in approximately 24 years. Reconstruction of ramps is also required in conjunction with street resurfacing activities. Last year’s resurfacing locations did not require reconstruction of sidewalk ramps, therefore in order to remain on schedule; sites near elementary schools were selected for improvement. Public sidewalk ramps will be reconstructed at Jefferson, Lincoln, Dodge, Wasmer and Gates Schools. The attached map shows the locations for this year’s work. Discussion Two (2) bids were received and opened on March 5, 2013. The Engineering Division of the Public Works Department and the Purchasing Division of the City's Attorney's Office have reviewed the bids that were received. A summary of the bids is shown below. Bidder Exceptions Bid Price The Diamond Engineering Co. of Grand Island, NE None $122,803.39 Galvan Construction, Inc. of Grand Island, NE None $99,480.50 Funds are available in Account No. 10033503.85318 & 10033506.85351. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 117 / 318 Alternatives It appears that the Council has the following alternatives concerning the issue at hand. The Council may: 1.Move to approve 2.Refer the issue to a Committee 3.Postpone the issue to future date 4.Take no action on the issue Recommendation City Administration recommends that the Council approve the bid award to the low compliant bidder, Galvan Construction, Inc. of Grand Island, Nebraska in the amount of $99,480.50. Sample Motion Move to approve the bid award. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 118 / 318 Purchasing Division of Legal Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Stacy Nonhof, Purchasing Agent Working Together for a Better Tomorrow, Today BID OPENING BID OPENING DATE:March 5, 2013 at 2:30 p.m. FOR:Handicap Ramp Project 2013-1 DEPARTMENT:Public Works ESTIMATE:$135,000.00 FUND/ACCOUNT:10033503-85318 & 10033506-85351 PUBLICATION DATE:February 18, 2013 NO. POTENTIAL BIDDERS:10 SUMMARY Bidder:Galvan Construction, Inc.The Diamond Engineering Co. Grand Island, NE Grand Island, NE Bid Security:Cashier’s Check Universal Surety Co. Exceptions:None None Bid Price: Section A:$21,258.25 $24,677.40 Section B:$26,434.00 $31,810.75 Section C:$19,236.00 $25,247.59 Section D:$17,863.25 $23,216.15 Section E:$14,689.00 $17,851.50 Total Bid:$99,480.50 $122,803.39 cc:John Collins, Public Works Director Catrina DeLosh, PW Admin. Assist. Mary Lou Brown, City Administrator Stacy Nonhof, Purchasing Agent P1620 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 119 / 318 Approved as to Form ¤ ___________ March 8, 2013 ¤ City Attorney R E S O L U T I O N 2013-62 WHEREAS, the City of Grand Island invited sealed bids for Handicap Ramp Project Number 2013-1, according to plans and specifications on file with the Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, on March 5, 2013 bids were received, opened, and reviewed; and WHEREAS, Galvan Construction, Inc. of Grand Island, Nebraska submitted a bid in accordance with the terms of the advertisement of bids and plans and specifications and all other statutory requirements contained therein, such bid being in the amount of $99,480.50; and WHEREAS, Galvan Construction Inc.’s bid is less than the estimate for such project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA, that the bid of Galvan Construction, Inc. of Grand Island, Nebraska in the amount of $99,480.50 for Handicap Ramp Project No. 2013-1 is hereby approved as the lowest responsible bid. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract with such contractor for such project on behalf of the City of Grand Island. - - - Adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Island, Nebraska, March 12, 2013. _______________________________________ Jay Vavricek, Mayor Attest: _______________________________________ RaNae Edwards, City Clerk Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 120 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item G10 #2013-63 - Approving Supplemental Agreement No. 2 with NDOR and Olsson Associates for Engineering Consulting Services Related to Capital Avenue Widening – Webb Road to Broadwell Avenue Staff Contact: Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 121 / 318 Council Agenda Memo From:Scott Griepenstroh, Project Manager Meeting:March 12, 2013 Subject:Approving Supplemental Agreement No. 2 with NDOR and Olsson Associates for Engineering Consulting Services Related to Capital Avenue Widening – Webb Road to Broadwell Avenue Item #’s:G-10 Presenter(s):Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Background All agreements must be approved by the City Council. The City and the Nebraska Department of Roads (NDOR) entered into an agreement, which was executed by the City on May 24, 2011 by Resolution No. 2011-124. This agreement specifies the various duties and funding responsibilities of this Federal-Aid project. The agreement requires that NDOR Standards and Specifications are to be used for design, construction inspection and quality control. On September 27, 2011, by Resolution No. 2011-283 the City entered into an agreement with Olsson Associates for engineering consulting services for the Capital Avenue Widening – Webb Road to Broadwell Avenue project. The work was to be performed at actual costs with a maximum amount of $354,124.45, plus a fixed-fee-for-profit amount of $44,912.99, for a total agreement amount of $399,037.44. The fixed-fee is computed upon the direct labor or wage costs, indirect labor costs, indirect-non-labor costs, and direct payroll additives. On February 26, 2013, by Resolution No. 2013-53 the City Council approved Supplemental Agreement No. 1 with Olsson Associates for engineering consulting services for the Capital Avenue Widening – Webb Road to Broadwell Avenue project. The fixed fee amount was increased from $44,912.99 to $46,578.62, an increase of $1,665.63. Actual costs are increased from $354,124.45 to $387,316.28, an increase of $33,191.83. The total agreement is increased from $399,037.44 to $433,894.90, an increase of $34,857.46. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 122 / 318 Discussion The original agreement with Olsson Associates and the City is being supplemented to allow for additional services to develop environmental documentation in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1970. This Act requires agencies to consider all potential environmental impacts in the planning and design for any transportation project receiving Federal Aid. The environmental document to be prepared by Olsson Associates is the Categorical Exclusion Document. This document confirms that the project will not cause significant impacts to planned growth or land use, will not significantly impact natural, cultural, recreational, historic or other resources, will not produce significant air, noise or water quality impacts, and that this project complies with several other environmental regulations. Due to the increase in scope from a three lane to a five lane improvement, additional evaluation and documentation will be required for potential farmland, park ground and historical property impacts. Because of the added potential impacts, the effort for developing the Categorical Exclusion document has increased significantly. Also, the process for documenting hazardous materials (Hazmat) has recently increased; additional database searches and more coordination with NDOR is now required. The schedule for the environmental phase of the project has been accelerated in order to capture 2013 Federal funds for relocation of utilities. Utilization of additional staff and additional coordination meetings with NDOR and the Federal Highway Administration is included with this supplemental agreement. The original agreement is amended and the fixed-fee-for-profit is increased from $46,578.62 to $49,780.08, an increase of $3,201.46. Actual costs are increased from $387,316.28 to $412,525.82, an increase of $25,209.54. The total agreement amount is increased from $433,894.90 to $462,305.90, an increase of $28,411.00 which the Consultant must not exceed without the prior written approval of the LPA. The City’s estimated share will increase from $86,778.98 to $92,461.18, an increase of $5,682.20. Olsson Associates is currently seeking environmental clearance and developing plans and specifications. Relocation of utilities is anticipated to begin in 2014. Construction is anticipated to begin in 2015. Alternatives It appears that the Council has the following alternatives concerning the issue at hand. The Council may: 1.Move to approve 2.Refer the issue to a Committee 3.Postpone the issue to future date 4.Take no action on the issue Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 123 / 318 Recommendation City Administration recommends that the Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign the Supplemental Agreement No. 2. Sample Motion Move to approve the resolution. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 124 / 318 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT #2 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND NEPA SERVICES CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA OLSSON ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT NO. URB-5436(5) CONTROL NO. 42707 CAPITAL AVE, WEBB RD – BROADWELL AVE THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the City of Grand Island, Nebraska, hereinafter referred to as the Local Public Agency or "LPA," and Olsson Associates, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant." WHEREAS, the Consultant and the LPA entered into Engineering Agreement BK1185 executed by the Consultant on September 21, 2011 and executed by the LPA on September 27, 2011, hereinafter referred to as the “Original Agreement”, and a supplemental agreement yet to be executed by the Consultant and LPA, hereinafter referred to as “Supplemental Agreement No. 1”, providing for preliminary engineering and environmental documentation services for Project No. URB-5436(5), and WHEREAS, it is necessary that additional environmental documentation due to an increase from 3 to 5 lanes, not contemplated in the Original Agreement or Supplemental Agreement No.1 be added under this supplemental agreement, and WHEREAS, it is necessary to increase the Consultant's compensation by this supplemental agreement for the additional work necessary to complete the project, and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the LPA that the project be constructed under the designation of Project No. URB-5436(5), as evidenced by the Resolution of the LPA dated the __________ day of ________________, 2013, attached and identified as EXHIBIT “A” and made a part of this agreement, and NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these facts, the Consultant and LPA agree as follows: SECTION 1. A Written Notice-to-Proceed was issued to the Consultant on February 13, 2013 to perform the additional work through Consultant Work Order 2. Any additional work or services performed by Consultant on the project prior to the date specified in the written Notice-to-Proceed is not eligible for reimbursement. SECTION 2. The Consultant will perform the additional work stipulated in Consultant Work Order 2, which is attached as Exhibit “B” and hereby made a part of this supplemental agreement. SECTION 3. For the work required, Section 6 of the Original Agreement is hereby amended and the fixed-fee-for-profit is increased from $46,578.62 to $49,780.08, an increase of $3,201.46. Actual costs are increased from $387,316.28 to $412,525.82, an increase of $25,209.54. The Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 125 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 126 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 127 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 128 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 129 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 130 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 131 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 132 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 133 / 318 Approved as to Form ¤ ___________ March 8, 2013 ¤ City Attorney R E S O L U T I O N 2013-63 WHEREAS, on May 24, 2011, by Resolution No. 2011-124 the Grand Island City Council approved entering into an agreement with the Nebraska Department of Roads for the Capital Avenue – Webb Road to Broadwell Avenue Project; and WHEREAS, on September 27, 2011, by Resolution No. 2011-283 the Grand Island City Council approved entering into an agreement with Olsson Associates for engineering consulting services for such project; and WHEREAS, on February 26, 2013, by Resolution No. 2013-53 the Grand Island City Council approved Supplemental Agreement No. 1 with Olsson Associates to allow for identification of potential conflicts with underground utilities owned by Northwestern Gas and CenturyLink; and WHEREAS, the work was to be performed at actual costs with a maximum amount of $387,316.28, plus a fixed-fee-for-profit amount of $46,578.62, for a total agreement amount of $433,894.90, and WHEREAS, the original agreement is now being supplemented to allow for additional services to develop environmental documentation in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1970; and WHEREAS, the original agreement is amended and the fixed-fee-for-profit is increased from $46,578.62 to $49,780.08, and increase of $3,201.46. Actual costs are increased from $387,316.28 to $412,525.82, an increase of $25,209.54. The total agreement amount is increased from $433,894.90 to $462,305.90, an increase of $28,411.00 which the Consultant must not exceed without the prior written approval of the LPA; and WHERES, the City’s estimated share will increase from $86,778.98 to $92,461.18, an increase of $5,682.20; and WHEREAS, Supplemental Agreement No. 2 to the original agreement with Olsson Associates is required to proceed with this project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA, that Supplemental Agreement No. 2 with Olsson Associates for engineering consulting services related to Capital Avenue – Webb Road to Broadwell Avenue is hereby approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute such agreement on behalf of the City of Grand Island. - - - Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 134 / 318 - 2 - Adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Island, Nebraska, March 12, 2013. _______________________________________ Jay Vavricek, Mayor Attest: _______________________________________ RaNae Edwards, City Clerk Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 135 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item G11 #2013-64 - Approving State Bid Award for (1) 2013 3500HD Chevrolet Silverado 4x4 Pickup for the Wastewater Division of the Public Works Department Staff Contact: Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 136 / 318 Council Agenda Memo From:Marvin Strong, Wastewater Plant Engineer Meeting:March 12, 2013 Subject:Approving State Bid Award for (1) 2013 3500HD Chevrolet Silverado 4x4 Pickup for the Wastewater Division of the Public Works Department Item #’s:G-11 Presenter(s):Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Background The Wastewater Division of the Public Works Department budgeted for a pickup for daily work duties within Collection Services. The approved FY 2013 budget included $40,000.00 for replacement of a pickup in the Wastewater Division. Discussion The vehicle specifications awarded under State of Nebraska Contract #13417 OC meet all of the requirements for the Wastewater Division vehicle. Sid Dillon Crete, Inc. of Crete, Nebraska submitted a bid with no exceptions in the amount of $37,908.00. There are sufficient funds for this purchase in Account No. 53030054-85625. Alternatives It appears that the Council has the following alternatives concerning the issue at hand. The Council may: 1.Move to approve 2.Refer the issue to a Committee 3.Postpone the issue to future date 4.Take no action on the issue Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 137 / 318 Recommendation City Administration recommends that the Council approve the State Bid Award to Sid Dillon Crete, Inc. of Crete, Nebraska in the amount of $37,908.00 for the 2013 3500HD Chevrolet Silverado 4x4 Pickup for the Wastewater Division of the Public Works Department. Sample Motion Move to approve the resolution. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 138 / 318 Approved as to Form ¤ ___________ March 8, 2013 ¤ City Attorney R E S O L U T I O N 2013-64 WHEREAS, the Wastewater Division of the Public Works Department for the City of Grand Island, budgeted for a vehicle in the 2012/2013 fiscal year; and WHEREAS, said vehicle, a 2013 3500HD Chevrolet Silverado 4x4 pickup, can be obtained from the State Contract holder; and WHEREAS, purchasing the vehicle from the State Contract meets all statutory bidding requirements, and WHEREAS, Sid Dillon Crete, Inc. of Crete, Nebraska submitted a bid with no exceptions in the amount of $37,908.00; and WHEREAS, the funding for such vehicle is provided in the 2012/2013 budget; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA, that the purchase of a 2013 3500HD Chevrolet Silverado 4x4 pickup in the amount of $37,908.00 from the State Contract holder, Sid Dillon Crete, Inc. of Crete, Nebraska is hereby approved. - - - Adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Island, Nebraska, March 12, 2013. _______________________________________ Jay Vavricek, Mayor Attest: _______________________________________ RaNae Edwards, City Clerk Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 139 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item G12 #2013-65 - Approving Union Pacific Railroad Pipeline Crossing Agreement for North Interceptor – Phase I Improvements; Project No. 2012-S-6 Staff Contact: Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 140 / 318 Council Agenda Memo From:Marvin Strong, Wastewater Plant Engineer Meeting:March 12, 2013 Subject:Approving Union Pacific Railroad Pipeline Crossing Agreement for North Interceptor – Phase I Improvements; Project No. 2012-S-6 Item #’s:G-12 Presenter(s):Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Background The North Interceptor-Phase I Improvements is comprised of 5.5 miles of sewage collection infrastructure, installed over forty (40) years from the early 1970’s to the present. Segments of the interceptor are in use beyond their engineered useful life, and the integrity of these is questionably compromised. Additionally, this interceptor will not be able to meet the capacity requirements warranted by Grand Island’s growth projections for the area. This gravity sewer interceptor project has incorporated modern large diameter sewer pipe methodologies, along with the rehabilitation necessary to complete the work. Phase 1 of this project concentrates on two (2) miles of large diameter gravity sewer work within the overall North Interceptor project planning. The result of this Phase 1 project will provide placement of new collection systems infrastructure under US Highway 30 and the Union Pacific Railways easement, which provides the infrastructure routing alignment needed to place a new headworks facility at the Wastewater Treatment Plant into service. The Engineering Division is in the final stages of completing plans and acquiring both temporary and permanent easements. A bid package will be advertised this spring for the actual project construction. Discussion The UPRR requires the City to enter into a “Pipeline Crossing Agreement” for the placement of new collection systems infrastructure within their easement. The City is also required to pay the UPRR a one-time License Fee of $10,600.00, upon the execution of this agreement. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 141 / 318 Without this agreement the City does not have legal access through the UPRR property and would not be able to complete the improvements associated with this project. Alternatives It appears that the Council has the following alternatives concerning the issue at hand. The Council may: 1.Move to approve 2.Refer the issue to a Committee 3.Postpone the issue to future date 4.Take no action on the issue Recommendation City Administration recommends that the Council approve a resolution allowing the City to enter into the agreement with the Union Pacific Railroad to allow for the North Interceptor – Phase I Improvements; Project No. 2012-S-6. Sample Motion Move to approve a resolution. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 142 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 143 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 144 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 145 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 146 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 147 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 148 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 149 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 150 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 151 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 152 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 153 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 154 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 155 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 156 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 157 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 158 / 318 Approved as to Form ¤ ___________ March 8, 2013 ¤ City Attorney R E S O L U T I O N 2013-65 WHEREAS, in connection with the North Interceptor – Phase I Improvements; Project No. 2012-S-6 a Pipeline Crossing Agreement is required by the Union Pacific Railroad in order for the City of Grand Island to place new collection systems infrastructure within their easement; and WHEREAS, the agreement also requires, upon execution, a one-time License Fee of $10,600.00; and WHEREAS, the agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City’s Legal Department. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA, that the City of Grand Island be, and hereby is, authorized to enter into the Pipeline Crossing Agreement with the Union Pacific Railroad in connection with the North Interceptor – Phase I Improvements; Project No. 2012-S- 6. - - - Adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Island, Nebraska, March 12, 2013. _______________________________________ Jay Vavricek, Mayor Attest: _______________________________________ RaNae Edwards, City Clerk Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 159 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item G13 #2013-66 - Approving Change Order No. 1 for Lift Station No. 7 Improvements Project No. 2011-S-1A Staff Contact: Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 160 / 318 Council Agenda Memo From:Marvin Strong, Wastewater Treatment Plant Engineer Meeting:March 12, 2013 Subject:Approving Change Order No. 1 for Lift Station No. 7 Improvements Project No. 2011-S-1A Item #’s:G-13 Presenter(s):Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Background On July 26, 2012 an ad to bidders was published in the Grand Island Daily Independent. On August 28, 2012 City Council awarded, Project WWTP-2011-S-1A, Lift Station No. 7 Improvements to The Diamond Engineering Company of Grand Island, Nebraska, in the amount of $479,558.95. Discussion Change Order No. 1 covers the removal of asbestos found in the roofing material by B2 Environmental, Inc. at Lift Station No. 7. The roofing material must be removed and properly disposed of by a licensed asbestos removal contractor. The Change Order amount is an addition of $1,897.50 resulting in a final contract amount of $481,456.45. All other provisions of the contract remain unchanged. Alternatives It appears that the Council has the following alternatives concerning the issue at hand. The Council may: 1.Move to approve 2.Refer the issue to a Committee 3.Postpone the issue to future date 4.Take no action on the issue Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 161 / 318 Recommendation City Administration recommends that the Council approve Change Order No. 1 for Lift Station No. 7 Improvements Project No. 2011-S-1A with The Diamond Engineering Company of Grand Island, Nebraska, in the amount of $1,897.50. Sample Motion Move to approve the resolution. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 162 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 163 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 164 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 165 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 166 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 167 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 168 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 169 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 170 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 171 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 172 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 173 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 174 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 175 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 176 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 177 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 178 / 318 Approved as to Form ¤ ___________ March 12, 2013 ¤ City Attorney R E S O L U T I O N 2013-66 WHEREAS, Advertisement to Bidders for Lift Station No. 7 Improvements, Project No. 2011-S-1A was published in the Grand Island Daily Independent on July 26, 2012, and WHEREAS, on August 16, 2012 bids were received, opened and reviewed; and WHEREAS, On August 28, 2012 City Council awarded, Project WWTP-2011-S- 1A, Lift Station No. 7 Improvements to The Diamond Engineering Company of Grand Island, Nebraska, in the amount of $479,558.95; and WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 will provide professional services for removal, and disposal of asbestos in a previous roofing system for the amount of $1,897.50; and WHEREAS, with the inclusion of Change Order No. 1 to the contract amount, a revised contract price is $481,456.45. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA, that Change Order No. 1 with The Diamond Engineering Company of Grand Island, Nebraska, in the amount of $1,897.50 for Lift Station No. 7 Improvements Project No. 2011-S-1A is hereby approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute such contract on behalf of the City of Grand Island. - - - Adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Island, Nebraska, March 12, 2013. _______________________________________ Jay Vavricek, Mayor Attest: _______________________________________ RaNae Edwards, City Clerk Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 179 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item G14 #2013-67 - Approving Change Order No. 5 for Aeration Basin Improvements at the Wastewater Treatment Plant; Project No. WWTP-2010-3 Staff Contact: Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 180 / 318 Council Agenda Memo From:Marvin Strong, Wastewater Treatment Plant Engineer Meeting:March 12, 2013 Subject:Approving Change Order No. 5 for Aeration Basin Improvements at the Wastewater Treatment Plant; Project No. WWTP-2010-3 Item #’s:G-14 Presenter(s):Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Background The City Council awarded the contract for construction to Oakview dck, LLC of Red Oak, Iowa in the amount bid of $3,487,000 for the Aeration Basin Improvements for the Wastewater Treatment Plant on December 7, 2010. The primary purpose of the Aeration Basin Improvements project is to replace existing aeration equipment that is at or near the end of its useful life. Two existing blowers have been replaced with two high efficiency units that improve reliability and reduce energy usage and operating costs. The two new blowers operate with the two existing blowers which have remained in service. In addition to the blowers, the aeration basin piping and aeration equipment is modified or replaced to optimize process controls and replace aged equipment. August 9, 2011, City Council approved a unit cost Change Order No. 1 for structural concrete sealing in joint work, in the amount of $89,252.00, for a revised contract is $3,576,252.00. September 13, 2011, City Council approved a unit cost Change Order No.2 for Spiral Screw Pump modifications, in the amount of $397,897.00, for a revised contract is $3,974,149.00. March 13, 2012, City Council approved a unit cost Change Order No.3 for miscellaneous changes to the work scope: Delete Field Painting of New Steel Frame in Blower Building, and Paint Existing Basin Aeration Pipe Supports, and Repair Existing Welds on Screw Pump No.3, and Relocate New Dissolved Oxygen Probes in Basins, and Change Mounting of New Disconnects for Basin Mixers and Valves, and Relocate New Blower Local Control Panels, and Add Power Monitoring of New Blowers, and Blower Power Penalty Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 181 / 318 This resulted in a credit of $(30,124.00), for a revised contract price of $3,944,025.00. June 26, 2012, City Council approved a time extension Change Order No. 4 covering substantial completion contract time extension for the blower, aeration basin improvements, and for the screw pump rehabilitation work, additionally a final completion contract time extension was granted. Change Order No. 4 added no additional costs to the contract amount of $3,944,025.00. Discussion The Aeration Basin Improvements Construction Project is complete, the new blowers, and aeration diffuser systems have been in service for the past month. Varying warranty work items in the project are still outstanding. Change Order No. 5 covers miscellaneous changes to the work as described below, and in the attached change order summary. Replace Stairs in Northwest Corner of Aeration Basins, and Existing Expansion Joints in Discharge Piping of Blower Nos. 2 and 3, and Re-use Existing Diffuser Piping Floor Supports in the Aeration Basins, and Repair Existing Welds on Screw Pump Nos. 1 and 2, and Repair Grout in Screw Pump No. 2 Channel, and Repair Grout in Screw Pump No. 1 Channel, and Hardware for Screw Pump Deflector Plates, and Adjustment for Floor Concrete Repair in Basin No. 4, and Adjustment for Floor Concrete Repair in Basin Nos. 1, 2, and 3, and Adjustment for Floor Expansion Joint Repair in Basin Nos. 1, 2, and 3, and Adjustment for Caulking of Wall Expansion Joints in Basin Nos. 1, 2, and 3, and Repair Receptacles on Basin Walkways, and Repair Screw Pump Channel Walls, and Field Paint Screw Pump Gear Reducers and Guards, and Contract Time Extension for Project Final Completion This results in a credit of $(14,443.25), for a revised contract price of $3,929,581.75. The current contract time for final completion is five hundred twenty (520) calendar days, or July 5, 2012. The days to achieve final completion for the project will be extended two hundred fifteen (215) calendar days to February 5, 2013, to accommodate both the rehabilitation of the mixed liquor screw pumps, and blower and aeration basin improvements warranty work. Alternatives It appears that the Council has the following alternatives concerning the issue at hand. The Council may: Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 182 / 318 1.Move to approve a resolution granting miscellaneous changes to the work and authorizing the Mayor to execute Change Order No. 5 with Oakview dck, LLC of Red Oak, Iowa. 2.Refer the issue to a Committee. 3.Postpone the issue to future date. 4.Take no action on the issue. Recommendation City Administration recommends that the Council approve Change Order No. 5 in miscellaneous changes to the work for Aeration Basin Improvement to Oakview dck, LLC of Red Oak, Iowa at the Wastewater Treatment Plant. Sample Motion Move to approve Change Order No. 5 to the contract for Aeration Basin Improvement to Oakview dck, LLC of Red Oak, Iowa. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 183 / 318 2/5/2013 CO5-1 CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT AERATION BASIN IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT _______________ CITY PROJECT WWTP-2010-3 BLACK & VEATCH PROJECT NO. 163132 _______________ CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 Change Order No. 5 covers quantity adjustments for the aeration basin concrete and joint repair items included in Change Order No. 1, repairs associated with the screw pumps, a contract time adjustment for completion of the screw pump rehabilitation work, and other miscellaneous changes related to the basins and blowers. Item CO5-1. Replace Stairs in Northwest Corner of Aeration Basins Initiated by: Engineer This change involves replacing the existing wooden stairs from the top of the basins to existing grade with aluminum stairs. Item CO5-2. Replace Existing Expansion Joints in Discharge Piping of Blower Nos. 2 and 3 Initiated by: Owner This change involves replacing one 24-inch expansion joint in the discharge piping of each existing blower, Nos. 2 and 3. Item CO5-3. Re-use Existing Diffuser Piping Floor Supports in the Aeration Basins Initiated by: Engineer The bid documents were based on replacing the existing floor supports for the new diffuser piping in the oxic zones of the aeration basins. Several of the supports were able to be salvaged and re-used. This change covers the credit for the supports returned to the manufacturer. Item CO5-4. Repair Existing Welds on Screw Pump Nos. 1 and 2 Initiated by: Engineer Under Change Order No. 2, sandblasting and re-painting the existing screws for Pump Nos. 1, 2, and 3 was included. Following sandblasting of Pump Nos. 1 and 2, some welds required repair prior to field painting. This change covers compensation for the repairs performed. Compensation for Pump No. 3 weld repairs was included in Change Order No. 3. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 184 / 318 2/5/2013 CO5-2 Item CO5-5. Repair Grout in Screw Pump No. 2 Channel Initiated by: Owner Upon removal of the screw for Pump No. 2, significant deterioration of the grout in the inclined channel was evident. This change covers the compensation for sawcutting and removing the grout, preparing and forming the areas, and placing up to 33 cubic feet of mortar repair product, BASF Emaco 10-61. Item CO5-6. Repair Grout in Screw Pump No. 1 Channel Initiated by: Owner Upon removal of the screw for Pump No. 1, some minor grout repair was needed in the inclined channel. This change covers the compensation grout repair up to 1.5 cubic feet using mortar repair product, BASF Emaco 10-61. Item CO5-7. Replace Hardware for Screw Pump Deflector Plates Initiated by: Engineer The deflector plates for each pump screw were originally anchored to the walls with carbon steel threaded rods and turnbuckles. The deteriorated hardware was replaced with stainless steel components. This change covers purchase and installation of the stainless steel hardware for all three pump screws. Item CO5-8. Adjustment for Floor Concrete Repair in Basin No. 4 Initiated by: Owner Change Order No. 1, Item CO1-1 included a cost of $15,600 based on an estimated quantity of 40 cubic feet for concrete floor repair in Basin No. 4. The actual quantity following repairs was 10 cubic feet, resulting in a credit of $11,700 for 30 cubic feet at a unit cost of $390.00. Item CO5-9. Adjustment for Floor Concrete Repair in Basin Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Initiated by: Owner Change Order No. 1, Item CO1-4 included a cost of $58,500 based on an estimated quantity of 150 cubic feet for concrete floor repair in Basin Nos. 1, 2, and 3. The actual quantity following repairs was 27.5 cubic feet, resulting in a credit of $47,775 for 122.5 cubic feet at a unit cost of $390.00. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 185 / 318 2/5/2013 CO5-3 Item CO5-10. Adjustment for Floor Expansion Joint Repair in Basin Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Initiated by: Owner Change Order No. 1, Item CO1-5 included a cost of $7,524 based on an estimated quantity of 792 cubic feet for floor expansion joint repair in Basin Nos. 1, 2, and 3. The actual quantity following repairs was 1,424.5 cubic feet, resulting in an additional cost of $6,088.75 for 632.5 cubic feet at a unit cost of $9.50. Item CO5-11. Adjustment for Caulking of Wall Expansion Joints in Basin Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Initiated by: Owner Change Order No. 1, Item CO1-6 included a cost of $3,840 based on an estimated quantity of 480 cubic feet for wall expansion joint repair in Basin Nos. 1, 2, and 3. The actual quantity following repairs was 520 cubic feet, resulting in an additional cost of $320.00 for 40 cubic feet at a unit cost of $8.00. Item CO5-12. Repair Receptacles on Basin Walkways Initiated by: Owner Some of the existing basin receptacles were not functional. This change covers troubleshooting the existing circuits and repair of wiring and connections. Item CO5-13. Repair Screw Pump Channel Walls Initiated by: Owner Upon removal of the screws, some deterioration of the concrete walls above the inclined channels was evident. This change covers the compensation for applying an epoxy-modified cementitious mortar (Tnemec mortarclad) to the walls for each screw. Item CO5-14. Field Paint Screw Pump Gear Reducers and Guards Initiated by: Owner This change covers the compensation for field coating the gear reducuers, belt drive guards, and coupling guards of each screw pump. Each component will prepared and field coated with a primer (Tnemec Series 27 Typoxy) and a finish coat (Tnemec Series 1075 aliphatic polyurethane). Item CO5-15. Contract Time Extension for Substantial Completion of the Screw Pump Rehabilitation Work and Project Final Completion. Initiated by: Owner Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 186 / 318 2/5/2013 CO5-4 The unexpected grout repair work in Screw Pump No. 2 channel (Item CO5-5) extended the completion date for the screw pump rehabilitation work. All work was completed on October 10, 2012. This completion date is reasonable and represents an additional 17 calendar days to be added to the current substantial completion date of September 23, 2012 (adjusted by Change Order No. 4). The current project final completion date of October 23, 2012 (adjusted by Change Order No. 4) was delayed due to field painting of the of the screw pump gear reducers and guards (Item CO5-14), resolution of the automatic operation of blower discharge valves, and completion of project closeout items. All work was completed on February 5, 2013 and represents an additional 105 calendar days. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 187 / 318 2/5/2013 CO5-5 CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT AERATION BASIN IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT _______________ CITY PROJECT WWTP-2010-3 BLACK & VEATCH PROJECT NO. 163132 _______________ SUMMARY CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 The Contract Price shall be modified as follows as a result of the changes described by this modification request. Additions to the Contract Price are indicated by a "+" in front of the amount, deductions by a "-". Effect on Contract Price Item Description Increase/Decrease In Contract Price (+/-) CO5-1 Replace Stairs in Northwest Corner of Aeration Basins +$6,326.00 CO5-2 Existing Expansion Joints in Discharge Piping of Blower Nos. 2 and 3 +$11,751.00 CO5-3 Re-use Existing Diffuser Piping Floor Supports in the Aeration Basins -$10,070.00 CO5-4 Repair Existing Welds on Screw Pump Nos. 1 and 2 +$1,791.00 CO5-5 Repair Grout in Screw Pump No. 2 Channel +$19,564.00 CO5-6 Repair Grout in Screw Pump No. 1 Channel +$600.00 CO5-7 Hardware for Screw Pump Deflector Plates +$1,806.00 CO5-8 Adjustment for Floor Concrete Repair in Basin No. 4 -$11,700.00 CO5-9 Adjustment for Floor Concrete Repair in Basin Nos. 1, 2, and 3 -$47,775.00 CO5-10 Adjustment for Floor Expansion Joint Repair in Basin Nos. 1, 2, and 3 +$6,008.75 CO5-11 Adjustment for Caulking of Wall Expansion Joints in Basin Nos. 1, 2, and 3 +$320.00 CO5-12 Repair Receptacles on Basin Walkways +$462.00 CO5-13 Repair Screw Pump Channel Walls +$1,504.00 CO5-14 Field Paint Screw Pump Gear Reducers and Guards +$4,969.00 NET CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE -$14,443.25 BID AMOUNT OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT $3,487,000.00 PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDER ADJUSTMENTS +$457,025.00 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 188 / 318 2/5/2013 CO5-6 Effect on Contract Price Item Description Increase/Decrease In Contract Price (+/-) CURRENT CONTRACT AMOUNT $3,944,025.00 CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 -$14,443.25 ADJUSTED CONTRACT AMOUNT $3,929,581.75 Effect on Contract Time --Substantial Completion for Original Contract, Calendar Days (Date) 460 (May 6, 2012) --Final Completion for Original Contract, Calendar Days (Date) 520 (July 5, 2012) --Current Contract Time for Substantial Completion of Blower and Basin Work, Calendar Days (Date) 60 (July 5, 2012) --Current Contract Time for Substantial Completion of Screw Pump Rehabilitation, Calendar Days (Date) 80 (September 23, 2012) CO5-15 Contract Time Extension for Substantial Completion of Screw Pump Rehabilitation, Calendar Days (Date) 17 (October 10, 2012) --Current Contract Time for Project Final Completion, Calendar Days (Date) 110 (October 23, 2012) CO5-15 Contract Time Extension for Project Final Completion, Calendar Days (Date) 105 (February 5, 2013) No additional claims shall be made for changes in Contract Time arising from these work items. This change order includes all costs, direct, indirect, and consequential, and all changes in Contract Time arising from the work included in the items for Change Order No. 5. No additional claims shall be made for changes in Contract Price or Contract Time arising from these work items. All other provisions of the contract remain unchanged. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 189 / 318 2/5/2013 CO5-7 Agreed to this _______ day of _______________, 2013 Recommended:Approved: Black & Veatch Corporation City of Grand Island By:_______________________________By:_____________________________ Project Manager Date:_____________________________Date:____________________________ Approved: Oakview dck, LLC By:_______________________________ Date:____________________________ Approved as to Form ___________ March 12, 2013 City Attorney Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 190 / 318 Approved as to Form ¤ ___________ February 12, 2013 ¤ City Attorney R E S O L U T I O N 2013-67 WHEREAS, on December 7, 2010, by Resolution 2010-342, the City of Grand Island awarded Oakview dck, LLC of Red Oak, Iowa the bid in the amount of $3,487,000 for furnishing materials and services for WWTP-2010-3 Aeration Basin Improvements project at the Wastewater Treatment Plant; and WHEREAS, on August 9, 2011, by Resolution 2011-207, City Council approved a unit cost Change Order No. 1 for structural concrete sealing in joint work, in the amount of $89,252.00, for a revised contract in $3,576,252.00; and WHEREAS, on September 13, 2011, by Resolution 2011-243, City Council approved a unit cost Change Order No. 2 for Spiral Screw Pump modifications, in the amount of $397,897.00, for a revised contract in $3,974,149.00; and WHEREAS, on March 13, 2012, by Resolution 2012-63, City Council approved a unit cost Change Order No. 3 for miscellaneous changes to the work scope, in the credit amount of $(30,124.00), for a revised contract in $3,944,025.00; and WHEREAS, on June 26, 2013, by Resolution 2012-163, City Council approved a time extension Change Order No. 4 for blower, aeration basin improvements, and screw pump rehabilitation work covering substantial, and final completion contract time extension, in the no cost change of $0.00, for the contract amount of $3,944,025.00; and WHEREAS, such miscellaneous changes to the work have been negotiated as fair and reasonable, and incorporated into Change Order No. 5, at a credit of $(14,443.25), for a revised contract amount of $3,929,581.75; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA, that Change Order No. 5 with the contracting firm, Oakview dck, LLC of Red Oak, Iowa, for WWTP-2010-3 Aeration Basin Improvements project at the Wastewater Treatment Plant is hereby approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute such contract on behalf of the City of Grand Island. - - - Adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Island, Nebraska, March 12, 2013. _______________________________________ Jay Vavricek, Mayor Attest: _______________________________________ RaNae Edwards, City Clerk Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 191 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item G15 #2013-68 - Approving Contract for Annual City, Electric and Water Utility Audits Staff Contact: Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 192 / 318 Council Agenda Memo From:Jaye Monter, Finance Director Meeting:March 12, 2013 Subject:Approving Contract for the City, Electric Utility and Water Utility Audits Item #’s:G-15 Presenter(s):Jaye Monter, Finance Director Background The City of Grand Island is required each fiscal year to have an audit of its financial statements. The City’s practice has been to request proposals for audit services every five years. On September 30, 2012 the five year contract with Almquist, Maltzahn, Galloway & Luth, CPA’s ended. Discussion The City requested proposals in January of this year and received responses from two firms. Both firms were determined to be qualified but one firm scored higher overall in the following six categories: 1)Qualifications of personnel assigned to audit 2)Previous experience with audits of similar scope 3)Proposed contract terms and conditions 4)Proposed cost 5)Proposed approach and scope of services 6)Adherence to schedule as outlined in this RFP The recommendation is for Almquist, Maltzahn, Galloway & Luth, CPA’s of Grand Island, NE to perform the audits for the City, Electric Utility and the Water Utility for the years ending September 30, 2013 – 2017. The total cost proposed of $312,000 for the next five years of professional services represents no increase to the City from the previous five year contract for audit services. The five year savings between the two firms responding is $6,540. Their proposed fees by year are: Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 193 / 318 2013 $ 60,000 2014 61,100 2015 62,300 2016 63,600 2017 65,000 Alternatives The Council has the following alternatives concerning the issue at hand. The Council may: 1.Move to approve 2.Refer the issue to a Committee 3.Postpone the issue to future date 4.Take no action on the issue Recommendation City Administration recommends approval of the audit contract as presented. Sample Motion Move to approve the contract with Almquist, Maltzan, Galloway & Luth, CPA’s to perform the City, Electric Utility and Water Utility audits for the years ending September 30, 2013 - 2017. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 194 / 318 Purchasing Division of Legal Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Working Together for a Better Tomorrow, Today REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR AUDIT PROPOSALS RFP DUE DATE:January 24, 2013 at 4:00 p.m. DEPARTMENT:Finance PUBLICATION DATE:December 22, 2012 NO. POTENTIAL BIDDERS:3 SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS RECEIVED Almquist Maltzahn Galloway & Luth BKD LLP Grand Island, NE Lincoln, NE cc:Mary Lou Brown, City Administrator Jaye Monter, Interim Finance Director Darren Buettner, Utility Accountant P1608 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 195 / 318 March 6, 2013 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Grand Island City Hall 100 East First St. Grand Island, NE 68801 ALMQUIST MALTZAHN GALlDWAY &..LUTH We are pleased to confirm our understanding of the services we are to provide the City of Grand Island for the years ending September 30, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017. We will audit the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information, which collectively comprise the basic financial statements, of the City of Grand Island, Nebraska, as of and for the years ended September 3 0, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017. Accounting standards generally accepted in the United States of America provide for certain required supplementary information (RSI), such as management's discussion and analysis (MD&A), to supplement the City of Grand Island's basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. As part of our engagement, we will apply certain limited procedures to the City of Grand Island's RSI in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. These limited procedures will consist of inquiries of management regarding the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We will not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. The following RSI is required by generally accepted accounting principles and will be subjected to certain limited procedures, but will not be audited: 1) Management's Discussion and Analysis. 2) Budgetary Comparison Schedules. 3) RSI Disclosures for a Street System Based on a Percentage of Roads m Good or Substandard Condition. 4) Schedule of Funding Progress -Public Safety Employees Retirement System. We have also been engaged to report on supplementary information other than RSI that accompanies the City of Grand Island's financial statements. We will subject the following supplementary information to the auditing procedures applied in our audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the Wealth Management, LLC Registered Investment Advisor, is affiliated with Almquist, Maltzahn, Galloway & Luth, PC. and offers wealth management and investment advisory services. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS SHAREHOLDERS Robert D. Almquist Phillip D. Maltzahn TerryT. Galloway Marcy J Luth Heidi A. Ashby Christine R. Shenk 1203 W 2nd Street PO Box 1407 Grand Island, NE 68802 Ph. 308-381-1810 Fax 308-381-4824 Email: cpa@gicpas.com A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 196 / 318 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Grand Island March 6, 2013 Page 2 financial statements or to the financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and will provide an opinion on it in relation to the financial statements as a whole: I) Combining Statements -Nonmajor Governmental Funds. 2) Combining Statements -Internal Service Funds. 3) Combining Statements -Fiduciary Funds. 4) Combining Statements -Component Units. Audit Objectives The objective of our audit is the expression of opinions as to whether your basic financial statements are fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and to report on the fairness of the supplementary information referred to in the second paragraph when considered in relation to the financial statements as a whole. The objective also includes reporting on- • Internal control related to the financial statements and compliance with the provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a material effect on the financial statements in accordance with Government Auditing Standards. • Internal control related to major programs and an opinion (or disclaimer of opinion) on compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a direct and material effect on each major program in accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. The reports on internal control and compliance will each include a statement that the report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the body or individuals charged with governance, others within the entity specific legislative or regulatory bodies, federal awarding agencies, and if applicable, pass-through entities and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. Our audit will be conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards for financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996; and the provisions of OMB Circular A-133, and will include tests of accounting records, a determination of major program(s) in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, and other procedures we consider necessary to enable us to express such opinions and to render the required reports. If our opinions on the financial statements or the Single Audit compliance opinions are other than unqualified (unmodified), we will discuss the reasons with you in advance. If, for any reason, we are unable to complete the audit or are unable to form or have not formed opinions, we may decline to express opinions or to issue a report as a result of this engagement. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 197 / 318 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Grand Island March 6, 2013 Page 3 Management Responsibilities Management is responsible for the basic financial statements and all accompanying information as well as all representations contained therein. Management is also responsible for identifying government award programs and understanding and complying with the compliance requirements, and for preparation of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-133. As part of the audit, we will assist with preparation of your financial statements, schedule of expenditures of federal awards, and related notes. You are responsible for making all management decisions and performing all management functions relating to the financial statements, schedule of expenditures of federal awards, and related notes and for accepting full responsibility for such decisions. You will be required to acknowledge in the written representation letter our assistance with preparation of the financial statements and schedule of expenditures of federal awards and that you have reviewed and approved the financial statements, schedule of expenditures of federal awards, and related notes prior to their issuance and have accepted responsibility for them. Further, you are required to designate an individual with suitable skill, knowledge, or experience to oversee any nonaudit services we provide and for evaluating the adequacy and results of those services and accepting responsibility for them. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls, including internal controls over compliance, and for evaluating and monitoring ongoing activities, to help ensure that appropriate goals and objectives are met and that there is reasonable assurance that government programs are administered in compliance with compliance requirements. You are also responsible for the selection and application of accounting principles; for the fair presentation in the financial statements of the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Grand Island and the respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally. accepted accounting principles; and for compliance with applicable laws and regulations and the provisions of contracts and grant agreements. Management is also responsible for making all financial records and related information available to us and for ensuring that management is reliable and financial information is reliable and properly recorded. You are also responsible for providing us with (1) access to all information of which you are aware that is relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements, (2) additional information that we may request for the purpose of the audit, and (3) unrestricted access to persons within the government from whom we determine it necessary to obtain audit evidence. Your responsibilities also include identifying significant vendor relationships in which the vendor has responsibility for program compliance and for the accuracy and completeness of that information. Your responsibilities include adjusting the financial statements to correct material misstatements and confirming to us in the written representation letter that the effects of any uncorrected misstatements aggregated by us during the current engagement and pertaining to the latest period presented are immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate, to the financial statements taken as a whole. You are responsible for the design and implementation of programs and controls to prevent and detect fraud, and for informing us about all known or suspected fraud or illegal acts affecting the government involving (1) management, (2) employees who have significant roles in internal control, and (3) others where the fraud or illegal acts could have a material effect on the financial statements. Your responsibilities include informing us of your knowledge of any allegations of fraud or suspected fraud affecting the government received in communications from employees, former employees, grantors, regulators, or others. In addition, you are responsible for identifying and ensuring that the entity complies Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 198 / 318 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Grand Island March 6, 2013 Page 4 w�th applicable l�w.s, regulations, contracts, agreements, and grants. Additionally, as required by OMB Cir�ular �-133, 1t 1s management's responsibility to follow up and take corrective action on reported audit findings and to prepare a summary schedule of prior audit findings and a corrective action plan. The summary schedule of prior audit findings should be available for our review on November 15 of each year. You are. responsible for preparation of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in conformity with OMB Circular A-133. You agree to include our report on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in any document that contains and indicates that we have reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. You also agree to include the audited financial statements with any presentation of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards that includes our report thereon. Your responsibilities include acknowledging to us in written representation letter that (I) you are responsible for presentation of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in accordance with OMB Circular A-133; (2) that you believe the schedule of expenditures of federal awards, including its form and content, is fairly presented in accordance with OMB Circular A-133; (3) that the methods of measurement or presentation have not changed from those used in the prior period (or, if they have changed, the reasons for such changes); and ( 4) you have disclosed to us any significant assumptions or interpretations underlying the measurement or presentation of the supplementary information. You are responsible for the preparation of the other supplementary information, which we have been engaged to report on, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. You agree to include our report on the supplementary information in any document that contains and indicates that we have reported on the supplementary information. You also agree to include the audited financial statements with any presentation of the supplementary information that includes our report thereon. Your responsibilities include acknowledging to us in the written representation letter that (I) you are responsible for presentation of the supplementary information in accordance with GAAP; (2) that you believe the supplementary information, including its form and content, is fairly presented in accordance with GAAP; (3) that the methods of measurement or presentation have not changed from those used in the prior period (or, if they have changed, the reason for such changes); and ( 4) you have disclosed to us any significant assumptions or interpretations underlying the measurement or presentation of the supplementary information. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a process for tracking the status of audit findings and recommendations. Management is also responsible for identifying for us previous financial audits, attestation engagements, performance audits, or other studies related to the objectives discussed in the Audit Objectives section of this letter. This responsibility includes relaying to us corrective actions taken to address significant findings and recommendations resulting from those audits, attestation engagements, performance audits, or studies. You are also responsible for providing management's views on our current findings, conclusions, and recommendations, as well as your planned corrective actions, for the report, and for the timing and format for providing that information. Audit Procedures-General An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements; therefore, our audit will involve judgment about the number of transactions to be examined and the areas to be tested. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We will plan and perform the audit to Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 199 / 318 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Grand Island March 6, 2013 Page 5 obtain reasonable rather than absolute assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misst�tem�nt, whether from (1) errors, (2) fraudulent financial reporting, (3) misappropriation of assets, or ( 4) v10lat1ons of laws or governmental regulations that are attributable to the entity or to acts by management or employees acting on behalf of the entity. Because the determination of abuse is subjective, Government Auditing Standards do not expect auditors to provide reasonable assurance of detecting abuse. Because of the inherent limitations of an audit, combined with the inherent limitations of internal control and because we will not perform a detailed examination of all transactions, there is a risk that material misstatements or noncompliance may exist and not be detected by us, even though the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards. In addition, an audit is not designed to detect immaterial misstatements or violations of laws or governmental regulations that do not have a direct and material effect on the financial statements or major programs. However, we will inform the appropriate level of management of any material errors and any fraudulent financial reporting or misappropriation of assets that come to our attention. We will also inform the appropriate level of management of any violations of Jaws or governmental regulations that come to our attention, unless clearly inconsequential, and of any material abuse that comes to our attention. We will include such matters in the reports required for a Single Audit. Our responsibility as auditors is limited to the period covered by our audit and does not extend to any later periods for which we are not engaged as auditors. Our procedures will include tests of documentary evidence supporting the transactions recorded in the accounts, and may include tests of the physical existence of inventories, and direct confirmation of receivables and certain other assets and liabilities by correspondence with selected individuals, funding sources, creditors, and financial institutions. We will request written representations from your attorneys as part of the engagement, and they may bill you for responding to this inquiry. At the conclusion of our audit, we will require certain written representations from you about the financial statements and related matters. Audit Procedures-Internal Controls Our audit will include obtaining an understanding of the entity and its environment, including internal control, sufficient to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and to design the nature, timing, and extent of further audit procedures. Tests of controls may be performed to test the effectiveness of certain controls that we consider relevant to preventing and detecting errors and fraud that are material to the financial statements and to preventing and detecting misstatements resulting from illegal acts and other noncompliance matters that have a direct and material effect on the financial statements. Our tests, if performed, will be less in scope than would be necessary to render an opinion on internal control and, accordingly, no opinion will be expressed in our report on internal control issued pursuant to Government Auditing Standards. As required by OMB Circular A-133, we will perform tests of controls over compliance to evaluate the effectiveness of the design and operation of controls that we consider relevant to preventing or detecting material noncompliance with compliance requirements applicable to each major federal award program. However, our tests will be Jess in scope than would be necessary to render an opinion on those controls and, accordingly, no opinion will be expressed in our report on internal control issued pursuant to OMB Circular A-133. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 200 / 318 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Grand Island March 6, 2013 Page 6 An audit is not designed to provide assurance on internal control or to identify significant deficiencies or material weaknesses. However, during the audit, we will communicate to management and those charged with governance internal control related matters that are required to be communicated under AICPA professional standards, Government Auditing Standards, and OMB Circular A-133. Audit Procedures-Compliance As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatements, we will perform tests of the City of Grand Island's compliance with provisions of applicable laws, regulations, contracts, and agreements, including grant agreements. However, the objective of those procedures will not be to provide an opinion on overall compliance and we will not express such an opinion in our report on compliance issued pursuant to Government Auditing Standards. OMB Circular A-133 requires that we also plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the auditee has complied with applicable laws and regulations and the provisions of contracts and grant agreements applicable to major programs. Our procedures will consist of tests of transactions and other applicable procedures described in the OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement for the types of compliance requirements that could have a direct and material effect on each of the City of Grand Island's major programs. The purpose of these procedures will be to express an opinion on the City of Grand Island's compliance with requirements applicable to each of its major programs in our report on compliance issued pursuant to OMB Circular A-133. Engagement Administration, Fees, and Other We may from time to time, and depending on the circumstances, use third-party service providers in serving your account. We may share confidential information about you with these service providers, but remain committed to maintaining the confidentiality and security of your information. Accordingly, we maintain internal policies, procedures, and safeguards to protect the confidentiality of your personal information. In addition, we will secure confidentiality agreements with all service providers to maintain the confidentiality of your information and we will take reasonable precautions to determine that they have appropriate procedures in place to prevent the unauthorized release of your confidential information to others. In the event that we are unable to secure an appropriate confidentiality agreement, you will be asked to provide your consent prior to the sharing of your confidential information with the third-party service provider. Furthermore, we will remain responsible for the work provided by any such third-party service providers We understand that your employees will prepare all cash, accounts receivable, or other confirmations we request and will locate any documents selected by us for testing. At the conclusion of the engagement, we will complete the appropriate sections of the Data Collection Form that summarizes our audit findings. It is management's responsibility to submit the reporting package (including financial statements, schedule of expenditures of federal awards, summary schedule of prior audit findings, auditors' reports, and corrective action plan) along with the Data Collection Form to the federal audit clearinghouse. We will coordinate with you the electronic submission and certification. If applicable, we will provide copies of our report for you to include with the reporting package you will submit to pass-through entities. The Data Collection Form and the reporting package must be submitted within the earlier of 30 days after receipt of the auditors' reports or nine months after the end of the audit period, unless a longer period is agreed to in advance by the cognizant or oversight agency for audits. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 201 / 318 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Grand Island March 6, 2013 Page 7 The audit documentation for this engagement is the property of Almquist, Maltzahn, Galloway & Luth, P.C., and constitutes confidential information. However, pursuant to authority given by law or regulation, we may be requested to make certain audit documentation available to regulatory agencies or their designees, a federal agency providing direct or indirect funding, or the U.S. Government Accountability Office for purposes of a quality review of the audit, to resolve audit findings, or to carry out oversight responsibilities. We will notify you of any such request. If requested, access to such audit documentation will be provided under the supervision of Almquist, Maltzahn, Galloway & Luth, P.C., personnel. Furthermore, upon request, we may provide copies of selected audit documentation to the aforementioned parties. These parties may intend, or decide, to distribute the copies or information contained therein to others, including other governmental agencies. The audit documentation for this engagement will be retained for a minimum of five years after the report release or for any additional period requested by the regulatory agencies. If we are aware that a federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, or auditee is contesting an audit finding, we will contact the party(ies) contesting the audit finding for guidance prior to destroying the audit documentation. The fee for the audit engagement will not exceed $60,000 for the year ended September 30, 2013; $61,100 for the year ended September 30, 2014; $62,300 for the year ended September 30, 2015; $63,600 for the year ended September 30, 2016; and $65,000 for the year ended September 30, 2017. Billings for our services will be rendered approximately every four weeks, and payment is due within 30 days of the invoice date. This engagement does not include any services not specifically included in this letter. Additional services that you may request will be subject to arrangements made at the time requested. Should we become involved in a regulatory agency investigation or judicial proceeding as a result of this engagement, and are not determined to be liable, you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to all expenses, costs, legal fees, and charges for the time of our people incurred in connection therewith. We look forward to providing the services described in this letter, as well as other accounting services agreeable to us both. In the unlikely event that any differences concerning our services or fees should arise that are not resolved by mutual agreement, we both recognize that the matter will probably involve complex business or accounting issues that would be decided equitably to both parties by a judge hearing the evidence without a jury. Accordingly, you and we agree to waive any right to a trial by jury in any action, proceeding, or counterclaim arising out of or relating to our services or fees. Government Auditing Standards require that we provide you with a copy of our most recent external peer review report and any letter of comment, and any subsequent peer review reports and letters of comment received during the period of the contract. Our 2011 peer review report accompanies this letter. We agree to comply with all applicable State fair labor standards in the execution of this contract as required by law. We further agree to comply with the provisions of applicable law pertaining to contributions to the Unemployment Compensation Fund of the State of Nebraska. During the performance of this contract, we agree not to discriminate in hiring or any other employment practice on the basis of race, color, religion, age, or disability. We agree to maintain a drug-free workplace policy and will provide a copy of the policy to the City upon request. Also, we agree to provide workers' compensation to our employees who are engaged in the City's audits on the City's premises. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 202 / 318 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Grand Island March 6, 2013 Page 8 In accordance with City Code, we understand that it is unethical for any person to offer, give, or agree to give any City employee or former City employee, or for any City employee or former City employee to solicit, demand, accept, or agree to accept from another person, a gratuity or an offer of employment in connection with any decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation, or preparation of any part of a program requirement or a purchase request, influencing the content of any specification or procurement standard, rendering of advice, investigation, auditing, or in any other advisory capacity in any proceeding or application, request for ruling, determination, claim or controversy, or other particular matter, pertaining to any program requirement or a contract or subcontract, or to any solicitation or proposal therefor. It shall be unethical for any payment, gratuity, or offer of employment to be made by or on behalf of a subcontractor under a contract to the prime contractor or higher tier subcontractor or any person associated therewith, as an inducement for the award of a subcontract or order. We understand that cancellation due to unavailability of funds in succeeding fiscal periods could occur. When funds are not appropriated or otherwise made available to support continuation of performance in a subsequent fiscal period, the contract shall be canceled and the contractor shall be reimbursed for the reasonable value of any non-recurring costs incurred but not amortized in the price of the supplies or services delivered under the contract. The cost of cancellation may be paid from any appropriations available for such purposes. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to the City of Grand Island and believe this letter accurately summarizes the significant terms of our engagement. If you have any questions, please let us know. If you agree with the terms of our engagement as described in this letter, please sign the enclosed copy and return it to us. Sincerely, ALMQUIST, MALTZAHN, GALLOWAY & LUTH, P.C. ���� Terry T. Galloway, CPA tg/dkk/07735 Enclosure RESPONSE: This letter correctly sets forth the understanding of the City of Grand Island. By: _________________ _ Title: ------------------------ Date: ------------- Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 203 / 318 Grafton&Associatespc CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To the Shareholders Almquist, Maltzahn, Galloway, & Luth, P.C. Grand Island, Nebraska We have reviewed the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of Almquist, Maltzahn, Galloway, & Luth, P.C. (the Firm) in effect for the year ended April 30, 2011. Our peer review was conducted in accordance with the Standards for Performing and Reporting on Peer Reviews established by the Peer Review Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The firm is responsible for designing a system of quality control and complying with it to provide the firm with reasonable assurance of performing and reporting in conformity with applicable professional standards in all material respects. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the design of the system of quality control and the firm's compliance therewith based on our review. The nature, objectives, scope, limitations of, and the procedures performed in a System Review are described in the standards at www.aicpa.org/prsummary. As required by the standards, engagements selected for review included engagements performed under Government Auditing Standards and audits of employee benefit plans. In our opinion, the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of Almquist, Maltzahn, Galloway, & Luth, P.C. in effect for the year ended April 30, 2011 has been suitably designed and complied with to provide the firm with reasonable assurance of performing and reporting in conformity with applicable professional standards in all material respects. Firms can receive a rating of pass, pass with de.ficiency(ies) or fail. Almquist, Maltzahn, Galloway, & Luth, P.C. has received a peer review rating of pass. May 24, 2011 www.graftoncpa.com 5935 S. 56th Street• Suite A• Lincoln, NE 68516 ail eac a.com Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 204 / 318 Approved as to Form ¤ ___________ March 8, 2013 ¤ City Attorney R E S O L U T I O N 2013-68 WHEREAS, the City of Grand Island is required each fiscal year to have an audit of its financial statements; and WHEREAS, proposals were solicited to perform the audits for the City, Electric Utility and Water Utility for the years ending September 30, 2013 through 2017; and WHEREAS, the proposals received on January 24, 2013 were reviewed; and WHEREAS, the proposal submitted by Almquist, Maltzan, Galloway & Luth, CPA’s of Grand Island, Nebraska is in accordance with the terms of the Request for Proposals, for five years of audit services for fiscal years ending September 30, 2013 through 2017; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA, that Almquist, Maltzan, Galloway & Luth CPA’s of Grand Island, Nebraska will perform the annual audits of the City, Electric Utility and Water Utility for the five fiscal years ending September 30, 2013 through 2017 for the amount of $312,000. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute such agreements on behalf of the City of Grand Island. - - - Adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Island, Nebraska, March 12, 2013. _______________________________________ Jay Vavricek, Mayor Attest: _______________________________________ RaNae Edwards, City Clerk Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 205 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item G16 #2013-69 - Approving Contract for HIDTA Funding for 2013/2014 Staff Contact: Steven Lamken Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 206 / 318 Council Agenda Memo From:Steven Lamken, Police Chief Meeting:March 12, 2013 Subject:Approval of HIDTA Funding Item #’s:G-16 Presenter(s):Steven Lamken, Police Chief Background The Police Department has been a member of the Central Nebraska Drug and Safe Streets Task Force for several years. The City acts as the fiscal agent for a portion of the funds used by the Task Force to include off site facility maintenance, vehicle leases and operational funds. The 2013 HIDTA award, 13HD06, is for $55, 442.00 and does not require matching funds. Acceptance of the award will provide funding needed for the operations of the Task Force. Discussion The Grand Island Police Department has been a participating member of the regional High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area, HIDTA, Central Nebraska Drug and Safe Streets Task Force for several years. The Task Force serves a valuable role in the investigation and prosecution of drug offenders and violent criminals. The HIDTA designation provides Federal funding for the investigative operations of the Task Force. The City serves as the fiscal agent for part of the task force funding that supports the operation and maintenance of the off-site facility, vehicle and cell phone use, and operational funds that are used to buy drugs/weapons and pay informants. The 2013 HIDTA award to the Task Force is $55,442.00. Approval and acceptance of the funding will support the Task Force during the year. The funding does not require a local match. Alternatives It appears that the Council has the following alternatives concerning the issue at hand. The Council may: 1.Move to approve Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 207 / 318 2.Refer the issue to a Committee 3.Postpone the issue to future date 4.Take no action on the issue Recommendation City Administration recommends that the Council approve acceptance of the 2013 HIDTA award 13HD06 for $55,442.00 for the Central Nebraska Drug and Safe Streets Task Force. Sample Motion Move to approve acceptance of the 2013 HIDTA award 13HD06 for $55,442.00 for the Central Nebraska Drug and Safe Streets Task Force. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 208 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 209 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 210 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 211 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 212 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 213 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 214 / 318 Approved as to Form ¤ ___________ March 8, 2013 ¤ City Attorney R E S O L U T I O N 2013-69 WHEREAS, The Grand Island Police Department is a member of the Central Nebraska Drug and Safe Streets Task Force; and WHEREAS, The Task Force has been approved for $55,442.00 of HIDTA funding for the operations of the Task Force; and WHEREAS, The Task Force serves an effective role in the investigation and apprehension of drug dealers and violent criminals, and WHEREAS, The City serves as the fiscal agent for the Task Force operational funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA, To approve award 13HD06 of $55,442.00 of Federal HIDTA funding for the operation of the Central Nebraska Drug and Safe Streets Task Force. - - - Adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Island, Nebraska, March 12, 2013. _______________________________________ Jay Vavricek, Mayor Attest: _______________________________________ RaNae Edwards, City Clerk Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 215 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item H1 Consideration of Forwarding Blighted and Substandard Area Determination Analysis: Community Redevelopment Authority Analysis No. 12 Grand Island, Nebraska to the Hall County Regional Planning Commission Staff Contact: chadn Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 216 / 318 Council Agenda Memo From:Chad Nabity, AICP Meeting:March 1, 2013 Subject:Blighted and Substandard Study for CRA Area #12 Item #’s:H-1 Presenter(s):Chad Nabity, Director Grand Island CRA Background Attached is copy of a Substandard and Blight Study as prepared by Stahr & Associates, Inc. entitled “Blighted and Substandard Area Determination Analysis: Community Redevelopment Authority Analysis No. 12 Grand Island, Nebraska”. This area as defined by the study will be referred to as Community Redevelopment Authority (CRA) Area #12. The study as prepared and submitted indicates that this property could be considered substandard and blighted. A blight designation was previously sought on this property in January 2009. At that time Council made a decision not to forward the study to the Planning Commission for their review and recommendation. The area was not declared blighted and substandard. As shown in this study construction within this subdivision stopped not long after that and the infrastructure was left uncompleted. This infrastructure, including the streets and storm sewer has not been accepted into the city system and is deteriorating at a heightened rate due to the fact that it was never property completed. The decision on whether to declare an area substandard and blighted is entirely within the jurisdiction of the City Council with a recommendation from the Planning Commission. The question before Council is whether to send the Study to the Planning Commission for their review and feedback or not to send the Study to the Planning Commission. If the item is not sent to the Planning Commission the Council cannot declare the area substandard and blighted. The Planning Commission will meet on April 3rd and would likely have a recommendation ready for the April 23rd Council meeting. Once an area has been declared substandard and blighted the CRA can accept redevelopment proposals for the area that most likely will include an application for Tax Increment Financing. The decision to declare an area blighted and substandard is a policy decision made by the City Council. If Council decides to declare an area blighted and substandard they should expect and even encourage redevelopment projects; including Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 217 / 318 those that come forward requesting financial assistance through the use of Tax Increment Financing. Grand Island has 11 areas that have been declared blighted and substandard 3,348 acres. This represents 17.11% of the area of the City. Grand Island can declare up to 35% of its municipal area blighted and substandard. Declaring this area blighted and substandard would add 234 acres to the blighted and substandard area in Grand Island increasing the percentage by 1.24% to 18.35% well below the 35% limitation. Discussion The public hearing and action item tonight relate to the Study for proposed CRA Area #12 including the area of Indian Acres Subdivision and Copper Creek Estates west and south of Shoemaker School in northwest Grand Island. The study was prepared for 234.4 acres all of which are in the Grand Island City Limits. Robert Sivick, City Attorney has reviewed the Nebraska Statures and case law pertaining to the declaration of property as blighted and substandard. His comments on this application are as follows: The statutory procedures for accomplishing blight relief include the following steps: (1) the identification of a community redevelopment area consisting of portions of a city declared to be substandard or blighted in accordance with statutory definitions and in need of redevelopment, (2) the formulation of a redevelopment plan for such area or a redevelopment project within such area, and (3) the implementation of the redevelopment plan through various means including acquisition, sale, leasing, and contracting for redevelopment. Nebraska Revised State Statutes (NRSS) 18-2103, 18-2107, and 18-2109. Under this statutory scheme, a private development project would be eligible for tax increment financing only if it is included within an area which has previously been declared blighted or substandard and is in furtherance of an existing redevelopment plan for that area. The declaration of property as blighted or substandard is not simply a formality which must be met in order to assist a private developer with tax increment financing; it is the recognition of a specific public purpose which justifies the expenditure of public funds for redevelopment. See Monarch Chemical Works, Inc. v. City of Omaha, 203 Neb. 33, 277 N.W.2d 423 (1979), Fitzke v. Hastings, 255 NEB 46 (1998) At this point, Council is only considering point 1 of Mr. Sivick’s opinion. According to NRSS §18-2109, it is clear that the City Council must send the Study to the Planning Commission prior to declaring the property substandard and blighted. If Council wishes to consider a declaration of substandard and blight City Administration is recommending that the City Council ask the Planning Commission to: Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 218 / 318 1.review the study as presented, 2.take testimony from interested parties about the substandard and blight designation, 3.make findings fact, relative to the questions below and any others Council has with reference to the this request, based on the information and testimony presented and, 4.include those findings of fact as part of their recommendation to Council in regard to this request. Recommend Questions for Planning Commission Does this property meet the requirements to be considered blighted and substandard? One substandard condition and one blight condition is enough to support the declaration. Identify those conditions as findings of fact. The conditions can be identified from the study. (Definitions of substandard and blighted conditions per NRSS §18-2103) The blight study as presented includes a substantial amount of undeveloped property. Is it necessary to include this property within the blight and substandard area to effectively redevelop the other sites? (Fitzke v. Hastings) Is it reasonably necessary to use tax money either through TIF or other means to redevelop the area? Should additional property be included within this study area? Should less property be included within this study area? Is this property substantially different than similar properties on the urban fringe of the community? The Planning Commission recommendation should be done at the first available opportunity, as the Planning Commission has 30 days to respond to Council’s request for a recommendation. Alternatives It appears that the Council has the following alternatives concerning the issue at hand. The Council may: 1.Move to forward the Study to the Planning Commission for their recommendation with the specific questions listed above. This will result in the Planning Commission holding a hearing and considering the study at their meeting in February. Council would then hold a public hearing and consider a resolution to declare the area blighted and substandard. 2.Move to not forward the Study to the Planning Commission for their recommendation Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 219 / 318 This would indicate that Council has no desire to declare this property blighted and substandard or that council does not believe more intervention is necessary to facilitate development/redevelopment than is provided by the standard police powers (zoning and subdivision regulations, nuisance/code compliance regulations) already available. 3.Refer the issue to a Committee Council may wish to refer this issue to a committee to determine set guidelines for the creation of new blighted and substandard areas. This could be done even with action on this item. 4.Postpone the issue to future date If Council feels that they need additional information before referring this item to the Planning Commission this would be an appropriate action. The additional information needed should be specified so that staff and the applicant can provide it in a timely manner. 5.Take no action on the issue This does not give the developer an answer about making a declaration on this property but would indicate that Council has no desire to declare this property blighted and substandard or that council does not believe more intervention is necessary to facilitate development/redevelopment than is provided by the standard police powers (zoning and subdivision regulations, nuisance/code compliance regulations) already available. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Council forward the Study to the Planning Commission for their recommendation with the specific questions listed above if Council wishes to consider declaring this area blighted and substandard and eligible for tax increment financing. Sample Motion Move to forward the Study to the Planning Commission for their recommendation with the specific questions listed above. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 220 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 221 / 318 BLIGHTED & SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ANALYSIS AREA NO. 12 GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA SSTAHRTAHR && AASSOCIATESSSOCIATES,, IINCNC.. County and Community Planning - Economic Development Consultants Telephone: (402) 710-1819 1512 Road 13 Fax: (402) 362-2526 York, Nebraska 68467 E-Mail: ojstahr@hotmail.com Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 222 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 Purpose of this Analysis The purpose of this analysis is to identify and determine if an area within the City of Grand Island, Nebraska should be considered blighted and substandard under the criteria for such areas as set forth in the Nebraska Community Development Law, Section 18-2103. A field survey of an area within the City of Grand Island was conducted in October 2008 and updated in February, 2013 to determine if this area, in fact, has experienced structure and site deterioration or if the area is experiencing other negative influences which decrease the potential for redevelopment or new development. The boundaries of this area are indicated in Figure 1 and described in Appendix A. The following report describes this Analysis Area in detail, as well as, specifying the methods and procedures used to determine if this Area should be declared blighted and substandard under the Nebraska Community Development Law. Definitions The following are the specific definitions of "substandard" and "blighted" according to Nebraska State Law. These definitions serve to be the basis of this entire analysis and each portion of the definitions are examined individually throughout this document. Substandard Area Definition Under the above referenced Nebraska Statute, a substandard area is an area in which there is a predominance of buildings or improvements, whether non-residential or residential in character, which by reason of: dilapidation / deterioration, age or obsolescence, inadequate provision for ventilation, light, air, sanitation or open spaces, high density of population or overcrowding, the existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes, or any combination of such factors, is conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency and crime, and is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals and welfare of the residents of the community. Blighted Area Definition Section 18-2103 of the Nebraska Revised Statutes indicates that a blighted area shall mean an area, which by reason of the presence of: a substantial number of deteriorated or deteriorating structures, existence of defective or inadequate street layout, faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility or usefulness, unsanitary or unsafe conditions, deterioration of site or other improvements, diversity of ownership, tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land, defective or unusual conditions of title, Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 223 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 224 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 improper subdivision or obsolete platting, the existence of conditions which endanger the life or property by fire and other causes, or any combination of such factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the community, retards the provision of housing accommodations or constitutes an economic or social liability and is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use and in which there is at least one of the following present: unemployment in the designated area is at least one hundred twenty percent of the State of National average, the average age of the structures in the area is at least forty years old or older, more than one-half of the platted and subdivided property in the area is unimproved land that has been within the City for forty years and has remained unimproved during that time, the per capita income of the area is lower than the average per capita income of the municipality in which the area is designated, or the area has had either a stable or decreasing population based on the last two decennial censuses. Analysis Approach The approach and methodology utilized by Stahr & Associates, Inc. in conducting the Blighted and Substandard Area Determination Analysis included an assessment of all factors listed in the Nebraska Community Development Law as factors that indicate or contribute to making an area blighted and substandard. Data relating to factors such as building condition, building age, site conditions, adequacy of building sites, condition of public improvements and unsanitary or unsafe conditions were developed through field surveys on a structure by structure basis or through collection of data on a unit by unit basis available from public records at the Hall County Courthouse. Data relating to other factors such as the adequateness of street layouts, lot layouts and overall subdivision design were investigated on an area-wide basis. Assessment of potential blighting factors stemming from diversity of ownership and tax or special assessment delinquencies were conducted through evaluation of courthouse records on all property within the analysis area, now referred to as CRA Analysis Area No. 12. This analysis also utilized two guideposts in the investigation of blighted or substandard conditions. These included: Additional Public Intervention Necessary Although the presence of one or more of these substandard or blighting conditions may make it appropriate to declare an area substandard and blighted under the Statue, this analysis was conducted on the basis that additional public intervention over and above the exercise of the police power is necessary to overcome the problems that exist in any substandard and blighted area. Specifically, Section 18-2012 of the Nebraska Community Development Law states that a determination shall be made that the conditions existing in any such substandard and blighted area are beyond remedy and control solely by regulatory process in the exercise of police power and cannot be dealt with effectively by the ordinary operations of private enterprise without the aids provided under the Community Development Law. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 225 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 Substandard or Blighted Factor Distribution This analysis was conducted on the basis that the substandard or blighting conditions, as defined in the Statute, must be reasonably distributed within any area that is determined to be substandard or blighted. This basic distribution factor, used as a control factor in determining the extent of any substandard or blighted area, assures that areas or neighborhoods which are in good condition are not determined to be substandard or blighted due to proximity to areas which are to be substandard or blighted. Existing Land Use The land uses that now exist within the Analysis Area are depicted on Figure 2, consist of land uses which can be placed in three categories, including: Residential (single-family, mobile home and manufactured homes) Public streets and alleys Vacant / undeveloped land Table 1 EXISTING LAND USE – CRA ANALYSIS AREA No. 12Grand Island, Nebraska LAND USE CATEGORY CRA ANALYSIS AREA NO. 8 AREA (ACRES)*PERCENT OF TOTAL AREA Residential 63.9 27.3% Street / Alley Rights-of-Way 25.9 11.0% Vacant / Undeveloped Land 144.6 61.7% TOTAL 234.4 100.0% Source: Stahr & Associates, Inc., (2013) * Existing land use acreage totals are tabulated based upon scaled plat maps and field surveys The land uses indicated for the Analysis Area on Figure 2 are analyzed further in Table 1. The data detail the breakdown of land uses within this Analysis Area, as well as the total acreage within this Analysis Area. As indicated in Table 1, the largest land use in this Analysis Area is that of vacant and undeveloped land. This undeveloped land comprises a total of 144.58 acres, or 61.7% of the Analysis Area. This is the area that is expected to develop and redevelop during the next several years. It is located along south side of Old Potash Highway, in the west central edge of the City of Grand Island. The second largest land use in this Analysis Area is that of residential. This use comprises a total of 63.9 acres, or 27.3% of the Analysis Area. Residential uses consist of single-family dwellings, mobile homes and manufactured homes. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 226 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 12 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 227 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 6 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 The smallest land use within this Analysis Area is Public street rights-of-way. The street pattern in the Analysis Area consists primarily of a square to rectangular grid system. This system is relatively inefficient and typically is one of the larger land uses within an Analysis Area. However, in this case, due to the amount of undeveloped land without streets, it comprises 25.9 acres or only 11.0% of the Analysis Area. Current Zoning within the Analysis Area Although not included in the statutory list of factors which may contribute to blight or result in substandard conditions in an urban area, local zoning regulations may contribute to further blighting or retention of substandard conditions if such zoning is inconsistent with the demands of the land use marketplace or such zoning discourages redevelopment or improvement of existing built-up areas. For these reasons an evaluation of the consistency of the land uses present in the Analysis Area with the current zoning districts and regulations applied to land in the Analysis Area was conducted. Land use within the Analysis Area is regulated through zoning districts established by the City of Grand Island. The City of Grand Island has established and applied 3 zoning districts to this Area as depicted on Figure 3. These zoning districts include the: TA Transitional Agricultural Zoning District, LLR Large Lot Residential Zoning District M Manufactured Home Overly Zone R2 Lower Density Residential Zoning District An analysis of the consistency of the existing land use with the applicable zoning and the appropriateness of the zoning district applications and regulations as they relate to encouraging or minimizing blighting conditions indicates that the current zoning districts applied to the land within the Analysis Area reflects the land uses in place and the residential character of the Area. The district regulations allow a variety of housing types which is also consistent with the Area. The existing zoning is thus not a factor which could contribute to substandard or blighted conditions in this Analysis Area. Analysis of Substandard Factors 1. Dilapidation/Deterioration of Structures The determination and rating of building structure conditions is a major part of any substandard area determination. Therefore the system utilized for classifying the conditions is a major part of any substandard area determination. The system utilized for classifying the conditions of buildings and structures must be based upon established and consistent criteria. Stahr & Associates, Inc. utilized a field survey method for evaluating the exterior conditions and to identify and classify building sites and other localized environmental conditions or deficiencies of all structures within the Analysis Areas. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 228 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 7 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 All data regarding each structure was dated and recorded on a Structure / Site / Infrastructure Survey Form. This form was utilized not only to record the data collected for later evaluation, but to assure that similar data for each structure was evaluated. (See Structure / Site / Infrastructure Survey Form, Appendix B). During the field survey, each component of each structure in the Analysis Area was examined to determine whether it was in sound condition or had minor, major or critical defects. Two types of building components were evaluated. These included: Major Components These components include the basic structural elements of any building; the foundation walls, load bearing walls and columns and roof structure. Minor Components These components include the necessary secondary elements of any building; the wall surfaces and condition, paint or wall covering condition, the roof condition, windows, doors, porches, steps and stairways, fire escapes, chimneys and vents, gutters and downspouts, etc. Both the major and minor components were evaluated and ranked in one of four categories and each category was assigned a numerical value as follows: Ranking Category Numerical Value No Problems 1 Minor Problems 2 Major Problems 3 Critical Problems 4 The numerical rankings of each major and minor component were then combined to generate an overall building condition evaluation comprised of five categories as follows: Major Component Numerical Ranking Minor Component Numerical Ranking Combined Numerical Ranking Overall Building Condition 2 or less 6 or less 8 or less Sound 3 – 5 7 – 8 10 – 13 Minor Deficiencies 6 – 7 9 – 17 14 – 24 Major Deficiencies 7 – 9 18 – 19 25 – 29 Substandard 10 or more 20 or more 30 or more Dilapidated The overall building conditions are defined as follows: SOUND: A sound building is one that has been and can be kept in good condition with normal maintenance. A sound building has no major component defects, no minor component defects ranked as major or critical or with major deficiencies, but may have up to three minor components ranked as having minor defects. MINOR DEFICIENT: Buildings ranked as deficient are those that require only minor repairs, which have not more than one major component defect that is minor in nature, which has not more than one minor component defect that is ranked as major in nature, nor more than three minor component defects ranked as minor in nature. MAJOR DEFICIENT (DETERIORATING): Buildings ranked as deficient are buildings that require major repairs, which have not more than one major component ranked as critical or not more than two ranked as having deficiencies that are major in nature, nor more than five minor component defects ranked as major in nature. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 229 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 8 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 SUBSTANDARD: A structurally substandard building contains defects which are so serious and so extensive that the building may not be economically repairable. Buildings classified as substandard have not more than two major component defects ranked as critical or major in nature, nor more than four minor component defects ranked as critical. DILAPIDATED: A dilapidated building contains such a combination of serious defects that there is no question that the building is uninhabitable and should be razed. All major components of a dilapidated building have defects that are major or critical in nature or a combination of less serious major component defects together with at least four minor component defects that are ranked as critical in nature. Field Survey Results As indicated in Table 2, the field survey of exterior building conditions in this Analysis Area indicates the following: Table 2 EXISTING LAND USE – CRA ANALYSIS AREA No. 12 Grand Island, Nebraska BUILDING TYPE SOUND DEFICIENT (MINOR) DEFICIENT (MAJOR) SUBSTANDARD DILAPIDATED TOTAL BUILDINGS TOTAL SUBSTANDARD BUILDINGS % Residential 72 16 17 13 11 129 41 31.8% Outbuildings 57 37 22 13 12 141 47 33.3% TOTAL 129 53 39 26 23 270 88 32.6% Source: Stahr & Associates, Inc., (2013) 88 out of 129 primary structures in the Analysis Area are classified as being in sound condition or as having only minor defects. The additional outbuilding analysis indicates that 94 out of 141 outbuilding structures are in sound condition or have only minor defects. 17 out of 129 primary structures in the Analysis Area are classified as deteriorating because of having major deficiencies or major component defects. The outbuilding analysis indicated that 22 outbuildings are classified as having major defects within the Area. 13 of the 129 primary structures and 13 outbuilding structures in this Analysis Area are classified as substandard are probably beyond economically feasible rehabilitation. In addition, 11 primary structure and 12 outbuildings are classified as dilapidated and uninhabitable. Combined, 88 of the total 270 structures, or nearly 32.6% of all structures in this Analysis Area, are classified, in accordance with the Nebraska Community Development Law, as being deteriorated, substandard or dilapidated. As indicated on Figure 3, the structures with major deficiencies or in worse condition are distributed throughout the central and northern portions of this Analysis Area. This distribution of substandard / obsolete structures is an indication that this Area is experiencing deterioration. The location of older and deteriorating structures within this Area significantly diminishes the marketability of property, as well as, redevelopment potential throughout the Area and, as a result, is a factor contributing to the substandard conditions within the Analysis Area. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 230 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 9 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 12 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 231 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 10 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 Conclusion: The results of the field survey of exterior building conditions indicate that there a number of structures that have major deficiencies or are in substandard condition and probably cannot be economically rehabilitated. Nearly 1 in every 3 structures within this Analysis Area can be classified by the Nebraska Community Development Law as being substandard. The existence of this level of substandard structures constitutes a substantial presence of substandard conditions in this Analysis Area. 2. Age or Obsolescence As presented in Table 3, observations made and data collected with regard to age of structures indicates the following: Table 3AGE OF STRUCTURES – CRA ANALYSIS AREA No. 12 Grand Island, Nebraska BUILDING TYPE NEW TO 1 YEAR 1 - 5 YEARS 6 - 10 YEARS 11 - 20 YEARS 21 - 40 YEARS 41 YEARS OR OLDER TOTAL STRUCTURES PERCENT OVER 40 YEARS OLD Residential 6 7 9 16 75 16 129 11.7% Outbuildings 2 6 14 36 48 35 141 24.8% TOTAL 8 13 23 52 123 51 270 18.9% Source: Stahr & Associates, Inc., (2013) Survey results indicate that 91 primary structures and 83 outbuilding structures were constructed over 20 years ago. Of this total, 16 primary structures and 35 outbuildings were constructed over 40 years ago. In the Analysis Area a total of 51 structures out of 270 total structures, or 18.9%, are 40 plus years old. Analysis of the Hall County Assessors assessment records for each parcel in this Analysis Area indicated that over 83% of the structures in the 21 - 40 age group were at least 37 years old. The housing in this Area is rapidly aging. Conclusion: The findings of the field survey and analysis and interpretation of the resulting data indicates that 18.9% of all the structures in the Analysis Area are in excess of 40 years old. In order for an area to be designated substandard, the law specifies that there must be a predominance of older structures. In this analysis the word predominance is defined as meaning "most frequent" or "a majority". In accordance with this definition, structures which are in excess of 40 years old are not in the majority of this Area, thus this Area cannot, at this time, be considered to be substandard by reasons of structure age and / or obsolescence. 3. Inadequate Provisions for Ventilation, Light, Air, Sanitation or Open Space During the field survey conducted to determine building conditions, building and lot conditions were also evaluated with regard to factors that present on-going negative conditions or impacts and thus contribute to the physical decline of any developed urban area. The lack of adequate ventilation, sun light, clean air, proper Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 232 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 11 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 sanitation facilities and open space can be a contributing factor to the decline of any urban area and the presence of any or all of these in reasonable numbers or intensity is considered, under Nebraska Community Development Law, to contribute to the substandard character of any urban area. The survey did not reveal any appreciable problems with ventilation of structures or where the size of the building on the lot and / or the small lot size itself did contribute to situations where there is a lack of sunlight and lack of open space. There was adequate front and side yards according to adopted zoning regulations. As documented later in this report, the northern portion of this Analysis Area does have some substantial problems relative to sanitation. There are a number of instances in the northern portion of this Analysis Area where poor surface drainage results in areas of standing, stagnant water. This ponding of water can become a health hazard for area residents due to infestation of mosquitoes during the warmer months. The southern portion of this Analysis Area also exhibits problems with sanitation relating to inadequate surface drainage due to lack of a complete surface drainage system. As indicated in the photographs below, the incomplete surface drainage structures leave open swales and ditches where water ponds and stagnates, creating not only a physical, but potential health hazard for area residents due to increased potential for increased mosquito production. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 233 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 12 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 Conclusion: The field investigation documented that there are not any properties within the Analysis Area where the lack of adequate provisions for ventilation, light, air or open space contribute to the substandard factors of the Analysis Area. However, the severity of the problem with poor surface drainage and the ponding of water is a factor that contributes to substandard conditions in this Analysis Area. 4. Existence of Conditions which Endanger Life or Property by Fire or other Causes The field survey indicated that there are several conditions which endanger life or property to varying degrees within the Analysis Areas. These include: There are 34 instances in the Analysis Area where various amounts of combustible items are stored or where there are junk, debris or waste tires stored very near or against the walls of the primary building on the lot. The presence of this combustible material, junk and debris constitutes a substantial fire hazard which could endanger both life and property. The analysis of the average age of structures within the Analysis Area indicates that 174 of the 270, or over 64% of all structures in the Area are in excess of 20 years old. Also, 69 of the 129, or 53% of the primary structures are either mobile or manufactured homes that are 20 years old. These types of structures and there age are by nature highly flammable, and along with the presence of large amounts of junk and debris create a fire hazard. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 234 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 13 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 There are numerous locations in the southern portion of the Analysis Area where open manholes and storm drainage structures present a severe falling and entrapment hazards. As indicated in the photographs below, these structures are only partially finished and their continued existence also can provide breeding grounds for mosquitos and other vermin which could present additional life threatening hazards. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 235 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 14 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 Conclusion: A number of conditions which endanger life or property through fire or other causes, do now exist in this Analysis Area. These conditions are sufficient in number and distribution to be a contributing factor to a blighted designation. 5. Any Combination of Factors which are conducive to Ill Health, Transmission of Disease, Infant Mortality, Juvenile Delinquency and Crime, and is Detrimental to the Public Health, Safety, Morals or Welfare The above listed factors indicate substandard conditions that do exist in the Analysis Areas. These conditions also present a real potential for detrimental effects on the safety and health of the citizens residing within the Analysis Areas when two or more of the substandard conditions occur in the Area. An evaluation of the various combinations of substandard conditions listed above produced the following findings. The combination of older housing, type of housing and a high percentage of junk or debris present within the Area (all factors listed above), combine to create negative factors that are detrimental to the public health, safety, morals and welfare of the citizens residing within this Analysis Area: The combination of the presence of flammable junk and debris create a fire-spreading hazard resulting in possible property loss and endangerment of life. The presence of older housing, the significant numbers of either mobile or manufactured homes and the presence of large amounts of junk increases the risk of fire spreading from one structure to another again resulting in possible property loss and endangerment of life. The presence of junk and debris on the lots not only create potential fire hazards, but also create unsanitary conditions, as well as, diminishes the overall physical appearance of the Area. In addition, this combined with the fact that rats and other vermin frequently utilize these areas for breeding grounds; all conditions that are detrimental to the health and welfare of the citizens. The existence of an inadequate surface system in the southern portion of the Area presents additional threats to health. The incomplete surface drainage structures leave open swales and ditches where water ponds and stagnates, creating not only a physical, but potential health hazard for area residents due to increased potential for increased mosquito production. Conclusion: The combination of these types of substandard factors throughout the Analysis Area significantly effects the local population working and residing in this Area. The level of impacted population is sufficient to conclude that this combination of negative factors is in and of itself a contributing factor to a blighted and substandard designation. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 236 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 15 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 Analysis of Blight Factors 1. Presence of a Substantial Number of Deteriorated or Deteriorating Structures As presented in the previous evaluation of the "Substandard Factors", a total of 88 of the 270 primary and accessory buildings in the Analysis Area are judged to be in deteriorating or worse condition. These deteriorating buildings represent over 32% of all structures in the Analysis Area. Conclusion: The presence of over 1 substandard structure for every 3 structures in the Analysis Area indicates that deteriorating and deteriorated structures represent a reasonable number of the total structures in the Analysis Area. This level of substandard structures is a contributing condition of blight. 2. Existence of Defective or Inadequate Street Layout The street pattern in the Analysis Area consists primarily of a network of arterials, collectors and local streets that provide access to locations throughout the area. The street system in the Analysis Area, for the most part, is a typical grid pattern that provides reasonable access to individual properties. Conclusion: The Analysis Area does not have inadequacies in the form of traffic movement capabilities and real property access. Defective or inadequate street layout thus cannot be considered a factor contributing to blighted conditions in this Area. 3. Faulty Lot Layout in Relation to Size, Adequacy, Accessibility or Usefulness The field survey, combined with investigations of property ownership and plat maps indicate that few problems exist relative to lot layout, lot size, adequacy, accessibility or usefulness within the Analysis Area. Those problems that do exist with regard to faulty lot layout are limited. There are two large lots on the north side of Old Potash Highway and west of Dale Roush Second Subdivision in which further subdivision will be difficult due to lack of accessibility. Conclusion: Although there are a limited number of problems associated with faulty lot layout and usefulness within this Analysis Area, the problems that currently exist, indicated above, should be considered only a limited factor contributing to blighted conditions in this Analysis Area. 4. Unsanitary and Unsafe Conditions As stated previously in the analysis of "substandard" factors, there are several instances within the Analysis Areas where unsanitary and unsafe conditions exist. These include: Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 237 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 16 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 The 34 instances in the Analysis Area where various amounts of combustible items are stored or where there are junk, debris or waste tires stored very near or against the walls of the primary building on the lot. The presence of this combustible material, junk and debris constitutes a substantial fire hazard which creates unsafe conditions within the Area. The average age of residential structures within the Analysis Area indicate that over 62% of such structures in the Area are in excess of 20 years old and the field survey indicates that most of these structures are either mobile or manufactured homes. These types of structures are by nature highly flammable. The existence of W. Old Potash Road, an arterial street, crossing through the center of the Analysis Area, presents a safety hazard for pedestrians and traffic along this road. The lack of sidewalks contributes to the increased risk for pedestrians along this road. Nearly all sites within the Analysis Area do not have sidewalks. The lack of sidewalks contributes to the increased risk for pedestrians throughout the Analysis Area, as pedestrians must use the streets/roads to move from one portion of the Area to another. The existence of large amounts of junk and / or debris in this area presents a significant fire hazard, in that a fire can spread easily from one structure to another. This creates unsafe conditions within the Area. In addition, the presence of junk and debris can create breeding ground for rats and other vermin that would result in unsanitary conditions within the Analysis Area. Over 83% of the lots within the Analysis Area have some type of drainage problem. This can become problematic as winter snow falls and / or melts or as spring and summer rains fall resulting in situations that disallow easy access to personal property within the Area. In addition, in both the northern and southern portions of this Analysis Area ponding water often becomes a health hazard with the infestation of mosquitoes during the warmer months. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 238 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 17 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 There are numerous locations in the southern portion of the Analysis Area where open manholes and storm drainage structures present a severe falling and entrapment hazards. As indicated in the photographs below, these structures are only partially finished and their continued existence also can provide breeding grounds for mosquitos and other vermin which could present additional life threatening hazards. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 239 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 18 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 Conclusion: There are numerous instances in the Analysis Area where unsanitary and unsafe conditions exist. These conditions do contribute to the unattractiveness of the Area and can thus be considered a major contributing factor to a blighted condition. 5. Deterioration of Site and Other Improvements The field survey also included an evaluation of the condition of site improvements including: street surface conditions, curbs and gutters, street width adequacy, sidewalks, driveways, and off-street parking facilities, fencing and drainage facilities. The data presented in Table 4 document the present condition of these improvements in the Analysis Areas. The lack of or deterioration of site improvements include: All of the primary structures have off-street parking. However, 89 of the 129, or nearly 70% of the primary structures have off-street parking on gravel / dirt surfaces. Often this parking can become problematic as winter snow falls and / or melts or as spring and summer rains fall resulting in situations that disallow easy access to personal property within the Area. In the southern portion of this Analysis Area, there is at least one instance where natural gas and storm sewer lines and pipes are uncovered and exposed to the elements. This can result in deterioration of these lines and pipes and present substantial safety hazards. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 240 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 19 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 Table 3SITE COMPONENT CONDITIONS – CRA ANALYSIS AREA No. 12 Grand Island, Nebraska TOTAL RESIDENTIAL STREET CONSTRUCTION CONCRETE/ASPHALT 130 130 GRAVEL / DIRT 0 0 STREET WIDTH ADEQUATE 130 130 INADEQUATE 0 0 STREET/CURB AND GUTTER CONDITION GOOD 130 130 FAIR 0 0 POOR 0 0 SIDEWALK CONDITION GOOD 7 7 FAIR 3 3 POOR 0 0 NONE 120 120 DRIVEWAY / OFF-STREET PARKING CONSTRUCTION CONCRETE/ASPHALT 41 41 GRAVEL / DIRT 89 89 NONE 0 0 DRIVEWAY / OFF-STREET PARKING CONDITION GOOD 71 71 FAIR 41 41 POOR 18 18 FENCING GOOD 42 42 FAIR 10 10 POOR 14 14 NONE 64 64 APPEARANCE UNKEPT 6 6 DEBRIS / JUNK 34 34 SURFACE DRAINAGE ADEQUATE 113 113 MINOR PROBLEMS 13 13 MAJOR PROBLEMS 4 4 OVERALL SITE CONDITION GOOD 85 85 FAIR 19 19 POOR 26 26 Source: Stahr & Associates, Inc. Field Survey, February, 2013 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 241 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 20 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 Nearly all of the primary structures in this Area, are not served by a sidewalk system. The non- existence of a sidewalk system contributes to generating traffic hazards for children and other pedestrians and to decreasing the desirability of this Area and thus contributes to the blighting factors that now exist. Over 30% of the lots in this Area are unkept and / or contain substantial amounts of junk and debris. This relatively high level of poorly maintained properties within this Analysis Area represents a considerable blighting factor. Over 83% of the lots within the Analysis Area have some type of drainage problem. This can become problematic as winter snow falls and / or melts or as spring and summer rains fall resulting in situations that disallow easy access to personal property within the Area. In addition, in both the northern and southern portions of this Analysis Area ponding water often becomes a health hazard with the infestation of mosquitoes during the warmer months. Conclusion: A combined rating of overall site improvements, as indicated on Table 4, indicates the majority of overall site improvements are in good condition. However, the fact that over 34% of the existing lots contain deteriorating site improvements creating a fair or poor rating implies that the Area is experiencing deterioration thus strongly contributing to the blighted conditions already present. In addition, the lack of site improvements in locations throughout the Analysis Area also serves to be a limiting factor to future development in the Area and thus is an additional factor contributing to blight. 6. Diversity of Ownership Stability and the livelihood of any urban area is dependent to a large extent on slow, but consistent, renewal of the area through maintenance and modernization or replacement of the existing developments. The ability to renew an area is thus partially dependent on the ability of the private and public sectors to acquire land of sufficient size to develop new housing or other land uses. The existence of smaller than optimal lots, under separate ownership make it difficult and expensive, if not impossible, to consolidate a sufficient amount of land to facilitate such renewal or redevelopment. Analysis of assessment records and plat maps of the Analysis Area indicate that, although the majority of platted lots are individually owned, the platted lots are of sufficient size to respond to the markets. Conclusion Diversity of ownership is not a significant factor contributing to blight in the Analysis Areas. 7. Tax or Special Assessment Delinquency Exceeding the Fair Value of the Land Correspondence with the Hall County Treasurer's Office, as well as, the Hall County Assessor's Office indicated that there are not any tax or special assessment delinquencies in excess of the fair value of the property within this Analysis Area. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 242 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 21 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 Conclusion Tax or special assessment delinquencies exceeding the fair value of the land are not found to be a significant factor contributing to blight in the Analysis Areas. 8. Defective or Unusual Conditions of Title A random examination of deeds and encumbrances on properties within the Analysis Areas was conducted as part of this Blighted and Substandard Area Determination Analysis. The examination indicated that few, if any defective or unusual conditions of title in this Analysis Area. Conclusion Defective or unusual conditions of title are not found to be a significant factor contributing to blight in the Analysis Areas. 9. Improper Subdivision and Obsolete Platting The field surveys, combined with investigations of property ownership and plat maps, indicate that any a few problems exist in the Analysis Areas with regard to improper subdivision or obsolete platting. There are two large lots on the north side of Old Potash Highway and west of Dale Roush Second Subdivision in which further subdivision will be difficult due to lack of accessibility. Conclusion Improper subdivision and obsolete platting is a limited factor contributing to blight in the Analysis Areas. 10. Existence of Conditions which Endanger Life or Property by Fire and other Causes The same factors listed in the "substandard factor" analysis that endangers life or property by fire and other causes can directly be correlated to conditions that cause blight. Therefore, those factors also contribute to the blighted character within the Areas. These factors include: The 34 instances in the Analysis Area where various amounts of combustible items are stored or where there are junk, debris or waste tires stored very near or against the walls of the primary building on the lot. The presence of this combustible material, junk and debris constitutes a substantial fire hazard which could endanger both life and property. The analysis of the average age of residential structures within the Analysis Area indicate that over 62% of such structures in the Area are in excess of 20 years old and the field survey indicates that a majority of these structures are mobile or older manufactured homes, which by nature are highly flammable. This combination of older and type of structures presents a substantial potential for endangerment of life and property. The existence of W. Old Potash Road, an arterial road that extends through the center of the Analysis Area, presents a safety hazard for pedestrians and traffic around this road. The lack of sidewalks contributes to the increased risk for pedestrians along this road. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 243 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 22 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 Nearly all sites within the Analysis Area do not have sidewalks. The lack of sidewalks contributes to the increased risk for pedestrians throughout the Analysis Area, as the must use the streets/roads to move from one portion of the Area to another. There are numerous locations in the southern portion of the Analysis Area where open manholes and storm drainage structures present a severe falling and entrapment hazards. As indicated in the photographs below, these structures are only partially finished and their continued existence also can provide breeding grounds for mosquitos and other vermin which could present additional life threatening hazards. Conclusion: A number of conditions which endanger life or property through fire or other causes now exist in this Analysis Area. These conditions, listed above, are sufficient in number and distribution in this Analysis Area to qualify as a major blighting factor. 11. Combination of Blighting Factors Section 18-2103 of the Nebraska Community Development Law, in its definition of blighted area, indicates that an area may be considered blighted if there exists any combination of the above factors which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the community, retards the provisions of housing accommodations or constitutes an economic or social liability and is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition or use, and in which there is at least one of the following present: Unemployment in the designated area is at least 120% of the state or national average; The average age of the residential or commercial units in the area is at least forty years; More than one-half of the platted and subdivided property in the area is unimproved land that has been within the City for forty years and has remained unimproved during that time; The per capita income of the area is lower than the average per capita income of the City in which the area is designated; or The area has had either stable or decreasing population in the last two decennial censuses. Examination of U. S. Census data completed as part of this Analysis indicates the existence of the following conditions which impede the sound growth of the Analysis Area: The per capita income of the area, U.S. Census Bureau Lots 1013 - 1016 is lower than the average per capita income of entire U.S. Census Bureau Tract 6 and the City of Grand Island in which the Analysis Area is located. The area has had either stable or decreasing population in the last two decennial censuses. Conclusion: The combination of the above factors which limit sound development of the City, impede development and redevelopment and produce an ongoing economic liability, are sufficient to be considered blighting factors in Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 244 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 23 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 the Analysis Area. In addition, in accordance with the requirements of this Section of the law, the per capita income of the area, U. S. Census Lots 1013 - 1016 is lower than the average per capita income of U. S. Census Tract 6 and also the City of Grand Island and the Area has had a stable population during the last two decennial censuses. 12. Other Blighting Factors In Section 18-2102, the Legislative Findings and Declarations (Introduction) of the Community Development Law, states in part some additional criteria for identifying blighting conditions including "economically or socially undesirable land uses". Factors which are commonly used to evaluate undesirable land uses include: 1) mixing of incompatible land uses, 2) economic obsolescence of the land uses or the land uses ability to compete in the market place, and 3) functional obsolescence of the land uses or the physical utility of the land and structures. This Analysis Area has a number of properties where the unsecured storage of junk and other debris constitutes a fire hazard and potential health hazards and where poor surface drainage results in problems with access to property and mosquito health hazards. Considerable amounts of junk and debris and poor drainage are "unattractive" environmental factors which contribute to undesirable land usage. The southern portion of the Analysis Area which is occupied by the Copper Creek Estates Subdivision is in very poor condition and has remained only partially developed due to the fact that it is economically obsolete in today’s residential market. Copper Creek Estates is presently perceived as a poor area to locate in and has become a blighting influence in and of itself. Conclusion: Economically and socially undesirable land uses exist in this Analysis Area and constitute a blighting influence within this Analysis Area and the City of Grand Island. These negative factors will continue to be a blighting influence without proper measures and public intervention. SUMMARY DETERMINATION OF THE ANALYSIS AREA AS BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD The land area contained within the Analysis Area, as set forth in Figure 1, meet the requirements of the Nebraska Community Development Law for designation as both a "substandard" and "blighted" area. As documented in this report, there is a varying, but reasonable distribution of 4 of the 6 factors that indicate that Analysis Area is substandard. These substandard factors and the intensity of occurrence are as follows: Present to a Strong Degree Existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes, and Dilapidation and deterioration of buildings and improvements, and Combinations of these factors which are conducive to ill health and detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. Present to a Reasonable Degree Inadequate Provisions for Ventilation, Light, Air, Sanitation or Open Space Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 245 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 24 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 Not Present Age and obsolescence of buildings and improvements, High density of population or overcrowding. Also documented in this report, there is a predominance of the factors regarding the characteristics of buildings and improvements, as set forth in the Nebraska Community Development Law. In fact, 6 of the 10 factors set forth in the law are predominate in the Analysis Area and thus the Area can be considered blighted in accordance with the Law. Present to a Strong Degree Unsanitary and unsafe conditions, and Existence of conditions which endanger the life or property by fire and other causes. Present to a Reasonable Degree A substantial number of deteriorated or deteriorating structures, Improper subdivision or obsolete platting, Deterioration of site and other improvements, and Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility or usefulness, Not Present Existence of defective or inadequate street layout, Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land, Diversity of ownership, and Defective or unusual conditions of title. Combinations of these blighting factors which substantially impair or arrest the sound growth of the community, retards the provisions for housing accommodations and constitute an economic and social liability and which area detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare are present to a reasonable degree. In addition, two of the five critical factors for blight determination is present as follows: Present The per capita income of the area is lower than the average per capita income of the City in which the area is designated. The area has had either stable or decreasing population in the last two decennial censuses. DETERMINATION OF NEED FOR PUBLIC INTERVENTION Section 18-2102 of the Nebraska Community Development Law requires that in determining whether or not any area is blighted or substandard, the conditions of the area must be such that arresting of the blight and substandard conditions within the area be beyond the remedy and control of the City solely by regulatory control and exercise of the police power and cannot be effectively dealt with by the ordinary operations of private enterprise without the aids provided under this law. Evaluation of the conditions of the Analysis Area, as determined by the analysis of each substandard or blight factor, indicate that although Grand Island can encourage long-term improvement of conditions within the Analysis Areas through implementation of zoning districts and zoning regulations, through replacement or improvement of streets, sidewalks, alleys and utilities and through improved overall law enforcement, it cannot overcome these problems without substantially increasing property taxes or creating property assessment districts to finance the Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 246 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 25 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 improvements needed. Increasing taxes or assessments over the existing levels will only serve to reduce spendable incomes in the City resulting in a further decline in the maintenance and thus the quality of structures and infrastructure within the areas. Copper Creek Estates Subdivision, which comprises the majority of this Analysis Area, has failed to be completed and sold as a residential subdivision because the costs associated with the acquisition of the land and installation of the necessary public infrastructure improvements have proven to make the sale of lots in the subdivision impossible. As a result, the subdivision has been left unmaintained with substantially incomplete infrastructure improvements which, in turn, has resulted in a perception of poor quality and an undesirable place to reside. In short, Copper Creek Estates itself has become a substandard area and a blighting influence which not only has but will continue to negatively impact the development of the subdivision and the areas adjoining this subdivision. As documented in prior housing market studies for the City, a primary housing demand which is not being met is that of housing for middle income households. An analysis of the current residential housing and lots on the market indicates that Copper Creek Estates is the only subdivision in the City at the present time which is designed to provide such affordable housing. If the development of Copper Creek Estates is to be successfully completed in a manner which will provide “affordable” housing in Grand Island, a method of offsetting at least a portion of the development cost has been proven and will be necessary. In summary, if the blighting and substandard conditions in the Analysis Area are to be effectively arrested within a time frame that will minimize further deterioration of the Area, the City of Grand Island and private enterprise working together through actions of local investors, government officials, the aids provided through Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and the use of other grant funds targeted to arrest the causes of the blighted and substandard conditions, identified herein, is necessary, essential and warranted. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 247 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 26 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 248 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 27 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 APPENDIX A LEGAL DESCRIPTION - CRA ANALYSIS AREA No. 12 Grand Island, Nebraska Beginning at the northeast corner of Center Township M and M Subdivision, Lot 1 in the NW1/4, NW1/4, Section 23, Township 11 North, Range 10 West of the 6th P. M., Hall County, Nebraska, thence north along an extension of the east line of said M and M Subdivision to the north right-of-way line of Old Potash Highway, thence eastward along the north right-of-way line of Old Potash Highway to the west line of Miscellaneous Tracts14-11-10 Part of the East ½, Southwest ¼, Section 14, Township 11 North, Range 10 West, thence north along the west line of said Miscellaneous Tracts 14,11-10, Part of the East 1/2 , Southwest ¼, Section 14 and the west line of Dale Roush Second Subdivision to the north line of Dale Roush Second Subdivision, thence eastward along the north line of said Dale Roush Second Subdivision to the east line of said Dale Roush Second Subdivision, thence southward along the east line of said Dale Roush Subdivision to the south line of Dale Roush Second Subdivision, thence south along an extension of the east line of said Dale Roush Second Subdivision to the south right-of-way line of Old Potash Highway, thence westward along the south right-of-way line of Old Potash Highway to a point on a line which is a northward extension of the east line of Lot 23, Copper Creek Estates Subdivision, thence southward along said extension line and the east line of Copper Creek Estates Subdivision and the east line of Miscellaneous Tracts in Section 23-11-10, Part of the E ½, Northwest ¼ , except the east 35’ and part of the West ½, Northwest ¼ of said Section 23 to the south line of said Miscellaneous Tracts in Section 23-11-10, Part of the E ½, Northwest ¼, except the east 35’ and part of the West ½, Northwest ¼, of said Section 23, thence westward along the south line of said Miscellaneous Tracts in Section 23-11-10, Part of the E ½, Northwest ¼, except the east 35’ and part of the West ½, Northwest ¼, of said Section 23 to the west line of said Miscellaneous Tracts in Section 23-11-10, Part of the E ½, Northwest ¼, except the east 35’ and part of the West ½, Northwest ¼, of said Section 23, thence northward along the west line of said Miscellaneous Tracts in Section 23-11-10, Part of the E ½, Northwest ¼, except the east 35’ and part of the West ½, Northwest ¼, of said Section 23 to the south line of Center Township, M and M Subdivision, Lot 1 in the NW1/4, NW1/4, Section 23, Township 11 North, Range 10 West of the 6th P.M, Hall County, Nebraska, thence eastward along the south line of said Center Township, M and M Subdivision, Lot 1 in the NW1/4, NW1/4, Section 23, Township 11 North, Range 10 West of the 6th P.M, Hall County, Nebraska to the east line of said Center Township, M and M Subdivision, Lot 1 in the NW1/4, NW1/4, Section 23, Township 11 North, Range 10 West of the 6th P.M, Hall County, Nebraska, thence northward along the east line of said Center Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 249 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 28 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 Township, M and M Subdivision, Lot 1 in the NW1/4, NW1/4, Section 23, Township 11 North, Range 10 West of the 6th P.M, Hall County, Nebraska to the northeast corner of said Center Township, M and M Subdivision, Lot 1 in the NW1/4, NW1/4, Section 23, Township 11 North, Range 10 West of the 6th P.M, Hall County, Nebraska, which is the point of beginning. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 250 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 29 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 APPENDIX B Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 251 / 318 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 30 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AREA DETERMINATION ANALYSIS ▪ GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA ▪ 2013 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 252 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item I1 #2013-70 - Consideration of Approving One and Six Year Street Improvement Program This item relates to the aforementioned Public Hearing item E-2. Staff Contact: Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 253 / 318 Approved as to Form ¤ ___________ March 8, 2013 ¤ City Attorney R E S O L U T I O N 2013-70 WHEREAS, the Regional Planning Commission, after public notice having been published in one issue of the Grand Island Independent, and such notice also having been posted in at least three places in areas where it was likely to attract attention, conducted a public hearing on February 6, 2013, on the One and Six Year Street Improvement Plan for the City of Grand Island; and WHEREAS, at the February 6, 2013 public hearing, the Regional Planning Commission approved the One and Six Year Street Improvement Plan 2013-2018, and recommended that such program be approved by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Grand Island City Council, after public notice having been published in one issue of the Grand Island Independent, and such notice also having been posted in at least three places in areas where it was likely to attract attention, conducted a public hearing on March 12, 2013, on the One and Six Year Street Improvement Plan for the City of Grand Island; and WHEREAS, this Council has determined that the One and Six Year Street Improvement Program as set out in Exhibit “A” should be adopted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA, that the One and Six Year Street Improvement Program 2013-2018, based on priorities of needs and calculated to contribute to the orderly development of city streets, and identified as Exhibit “A”, is hereby approved and adopted by this Council. - - - Adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Island, Nebraska, March 12, 2013. _______________________________________ Jay Vavricek, Mayor Attest: _______________________________________ RaNae Edwards, City Clerk Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 254 / 318 2013 ONE AND SIX YEAR STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 255 / 318 Sheet 1 of 1 County:City:Village: LENGTH UNIT OF MEASURE PROJECTED COST CONTRACT PROJECT OWN FORCES DATE COMPLETED (Nearest Tenth) (Thousands)(Actual or Estimated) M-310 (89)1.2 MILE Delayed, Construction in 2015 M-310 (411)2.0 MILE 2,794 X Est. June 2013 M-310 (508)0.7 MILE Delayed to 1-Year Plan M-310 (515)0.2 MILE 248 X July 2012 M-310 (537)300.0 FEET Delayed to 1-Year Plan M-310 (578)1.9 MILE 1,144 X October 2012 M-310 (579)4.5 MILE Delayed to 1-Year Plan, construction completed in 2014 M-310 (591)100.0 FEET Delayed to 1-Year Plan M-310 (593)1.3 MILE 603 X August 2012 M-310 (267)220.0 FEET Delayed to 2014 M-310 (459)Deleted, not street improvement project M-310 (461)Deleted, not street improvement project M-310 (544)Deleted, not street improvement project M-310 (595)Deleted, not street improvement project M-310 (596)Deleted, not street improvement project M-310 (447)Deleted, not street improvement project M-310 (572)Deleted, not street improvement project M-310 (590)Deleted, not street improvement project M-310 (597)0.0 MILE 102 X June 2012 Signature:Title:Date: NBCS Form 11, Jul 96 Street Superintendent PROJECT NUMBER Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 11 Report of Previous Year Highway or Street Improvement Year Ending:December 31, 2012 GRAND ISLAND Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 256 / 318 Sheet:1 of 1 County:City:Village: PRIORITY NUMBER LENGTH UNIT OF MEASURE ESTIMATED COST (Nearest Tenth) (Thousands) 1 M-310 (579)4.5 MILE 3,413 2 M-310 (508)0.7 MILE 1,495 3 M-310 (537)300.0 FEET 384 4 M-310 (591)100.0 FEET 40 5 M-310 (588)1.0 MILE 1,200 Signature:Title:Date: NBCS Form 8, Jul 96 Shoulder Imp @ BNSF Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 8 Summary of One-Year Plan Year Ending:December 31, 2012 GRAND ISLAND Federal Aid Project PROJECT NUMBER REMARKS Federal Aid Project Federal Aid Project Blaine Street Paving Street Superintendent Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 257 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 258 / 318 Sheet:1 of 1 County:City:Village: PRIORITY NUMBER LENGTH UNIT OF MEASURE ESTIMATED COST (Nearest Tenth) (Thousands) 1 M-310 (579)4.5 MILE 3,413 2 M-310 (508)0.7 MILE 1,495 3 M-310 (537)300.0 FEET 384 4 M-310 (89)1.2 MILE 8,151 5 M-310 (581)12.2 MILE 5,745 6 M-310 (623)9.6 MILE 6,019 7 M-310 (591)100.0 FEET 40 8 M-310 (267)220.0 FEET 200 9 M-310 (624)0.4 MILE 160 10 M-310 (622)0.8 MILE 250 11 M-310 (588)1.0 MILE 1,200 12 M-310 (598)600.0 FEET 45 13 M-310 (353)0.4 MILE 820 14 M-310 (609)1.0 MILE 800 15 M-310 (599)1.0 MILE 700 16 M-310 (520)2.0 MILE 1,500 Signature:Title:Date: NBCS Form 9, Jul 96 Blaine St Paving from Schimmer to Wildwood - CDBG Blaine St Bridges Stuhr Rd Concrete Overlay Shady Bend Rd - Mill & Resurface/Bridge Repair Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 9 Summary of Six-Year Plan Six-Year Period Ending:December 31, 2012 GRAND ISLAND Custer & 15th - Realign Dwy/Traffic Signal Install - FED AID Capital Avenue Widening - Webb to Broadwell Hwy 30 Resurfacing - NDOR Hwy 281 in GI & North - NDOR Broadwell Ave Shoulder Improvement @ BNSF Crossing PROJECT NUMBER REMARKS Various Location Resurfacing - FED AID US Hwy 30 Drainage Improvements - FED AID Skypark Rd Improvements - Capital to Airport Skypark Rd Improvements - Airport to Abbott Capital Ave Widening - Broadwell to Skypark Skypark & Airport Intersection Improvements Faidley Ave extention to North Rd Street Superintendent Reasons for major changes in the Six-Year program are as follows: Leadership change in the City of Grand Island Public Works Department recongnizing the need to revise and edit the projects being listed on the annual One- and Six-Year Plan. A list of the deleted projects, as well as, projects that have been removed until they are programmed/funded are attached. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 259 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 260 / 318 M-310 (447)Trail along Moores Creek Drain - State to Capital Connector M-310 (459)Southwest Drainage Project (CCC to Wood River) M-310 (461)Construction of NW GI Flood Control Project M-310 (485)PVIP Drainage Project - Phase I (Design) M-310 (507)Independence - Construct Culverts & Fill in West Ditch M-310 (511)Moores Creek - Old Potash to Edna M-310 (544)Concrete Lining of Drainage Ditches M-310 (559)Concrete Lining of Drainage Ditches M-310 (563)Concrete Lining of Drainage Ditches M-310 (565)Trail along Locust from US Hwy 34 to Stagecoach M-310 (568)Update Moores Creek Drainage Plan M-310 (572)Annual Sidewalk Projects M-310 (576)Misc. Major Drainage Development M-310 (590)Third & Wheeler Downtown Historical Lighting Project M-310 (595)Highway 281 Drainage Project - Phase I M-310 (596)Storm Cell Improvements M-310 (600)Annual Asphalt Resurfacing Project M-310 (601)Storm Cell Improvements M-310 (602)Highway 281 Drainage Project - Phase II M-310 (603)Comprehensive Drainage Plan M-310 (605)Trail along Broadwell Ave - Capital Ave to Eagle Scout Park - PE M-310 (611)Annual Asphalt Resurfacing Project M-310 (612)Highway 281 Drainage Project - Phase III M-310 (613)Storm Cell Improvements M-310 (616)Annual Asphalt Resurfacing Project M-310 (617)Storm Cell Improvements M-310 (619)Annual Asphalt Resurfacing Project M-310 (620)Storm Cell Improvements M-310 (621)Annual Asphalt Resurfaincg Project M-310 (499A)Broadwell Ave/UPRR - Environmental Study/Preliminary Engineering M-310 (507A)Independence Avenue Drainage - Design M-310 (584A)Stolley Park Corridor Improvements (Design) DELETED PROJECTS Deleted & Removed Projects City of Grand Island - 2013 1 of 2 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 261 / 318 Deleted & Removed Projects City of Grand Island - 2013 M-310 (352)Hwy 30 Relocation - US 281 West M-310 (458)Signal @ US Highway 34/281 and Wildwood Rd M-310 (497)Lighting on US Highway 281 from Stolley Park Rd to Old Potash Hwy M-310 (499)Broadwell Ave/UPRR - Construction M-310 (502)Shady Bend Rd @ UPRR -E Bypass M-310 (518)Quiet Zone - UPRR Corridor - Lincoln, Broadwell & Blaine/Custer M-310 (521)Swift Rd - WWTP to Stuhr Rd M-310 (527)Misc. Safety Projects - TBD M-310 (528)State/Diers Intersection Improvements M-310 (533)Husker Hwy W of US Hwy 34/281 Intersection M-310 (535)Barr Middle School Traffic Circulation Improvements M-310 (538)Capital Ave & North Rd Intersection Improvement M-310 (539)3rd St Widening - Adams to Eddy M-310 (540)North Rd & 13th St Intersection Improvements M-310 (545)Signal @ US Hwy 34/281 and Rae Rd M-310 (546)Annual Paving Program (Assessment Districts) - W Stolley Park Rd & Westwood Park Sub M-310 (550)Left Turn Lane - North Rd @ NWHS M-310 (551)Stolley Park Rd & North Rd Intersection M-310 (552)Left Turn Lane on Husker Hwy @ HLHS M-310 (553)Left Turn Lane on 13th @ Redwood/Mansfield M-310 (554)Resurface Wildwood from US Hwy 281 to Locust St M-310 (556)North Rd over UPRR M-310 (564)Stolley - Fonner/HEC/Fair Entrance to Stuhr Rd M-310 (574)Misc. Signals - TBD M-310 (580)Highway 281 Southbound Repair M-310 (583)North Rd & Old Potash Intersection Improvements M-310 (585)State Street - Webb Rd to Broadwell Ave Safety Improvement M-310 (586)Broadwell Ave - Capital to Airport Rd M-310 (587)Webb Rd - UPRR to south of Stolley Park Rd M-310 (599)Sky Park Improvements - Airport Rd to Abbott Rd M-310 (604)Highway 281 Safety Enhancement Improvement Project M-310 (606)Webb Rd & State St Intersection (Geometrics) M-310 (607)Diers Ave & State Street / US Hwy 281 - Design (Geometrics) M-310 (608)Locust St & Anna St (Geometrics) M-310 (610)Sycamore St Underpass - Complete Rebuild/Rehab (drainage/pavement) - Phase I M-310 (618)Eddy Street Underpass Complete Rebuild/Rehab (drainage/pavement) - Phase I M-310 (535A)Barr Middle School Traffic Circulation Improvements (Design) REMOVED PROJECTS 2 of 2 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 262 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Capital Avenue from Webb Road to Broadwell Avenue Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphalt Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = 8,749, 2031 = 11,000 Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Urban Minor Arterial PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Municipal Surfacing Thickness: 8" Width: 62' Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Double 12' Rise: 4' Length: 50' Type: Concrete Culvert Diameter: 48" Length: 175' Type: Concrete Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Widen roadway to from 2 lanes to 5 lanes with curb & gutter. Federal Aid Project No. URB-5436(5) ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 1,630 6,521 8,151 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 1.2 Mile Project No.: M-310(89) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 263 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Blaine Street N of Hwy 34 at Wood River crossing Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) 2 (two) Bridges - See bridge inventory data attached for existing attributes U104513905 - South Structure U104513910 - North Structure Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = 2815, 2031 = 6,000 Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Collector PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Municipal (HL93) Surfacing Thickness: varies Width: 18' or 25' Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: 12' Rise: 6' Length: 48' Type: Concrete Culvert Diameter: 42" Length: 48' Type: Arch RCP Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Bridge U104513910 to be replaced by two box culverts of the same size. Bridge U104513905 to be replaced by two Arch RCP culvert pipes. Hydraulic Analysis was conducted in 2002 and will be double checked before final design is approved. ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 200 200 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 220 Feet Project No.: M-310(267) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 264 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 265 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 266 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 267 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 268 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 269 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 270 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 271 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 272 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 273 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 274 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 275 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 276 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 277 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Faidley Avenue from North Road to East end of Faidley Ave. Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) None (new construction) Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = 0, 2031 = 2,000 Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Collector PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Local Surfacing Thickness: Width: Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: New construction - Design has not been completed. Form 7 will be updated as the design is finalized. Noted on 2004 Comprehensive Transportation Plan. ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 800 800 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 0.4 Mile Project No.: M-310(353) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 278 / 318 City of Grand Island, Nebraska Page 36 Comprehensive Transportation Plan 6.2 East / West Traffic Flow Improvements Widen US Highway 30 on 2nd Street between Grant and Greenwich Streets: As shown in the appendix, this proposal would involve widening US Highway 30 in order to provide a center left turn lane through a heavily commercialized area, west of the downtown district. Typically, a facility of this type would have a capacity of about 16,700 vpd. However, it carries upwards of 20,000 vpd between Grant and Greenwich Streets, which shows that the functional usefulness of this roadway is being taxed. It is forecasted to carry about 22,000 vpd in 2020 with V/C ratios of about 1.2. Thus a 4 lane cross section would be inadequate to serve future traffic. Adding a center left turn lane in this location would increase the capacity of the facility by approximately 30%. The center left turn lane would increase the safety in the corridor by removing turning movements from the through traffic flow. Moreover, the existing level of access to businesses and residences adjacent to the highway would be maintained but the access points may need some relocation. Because of the operational improvements, widening of US Highway 30 would be expected to attract an additional 2000 vpd. The widening of this roadway would have adjacent land use impacts. The minimum travel way for a 5-lane section would be approximately 64 feet. The typical existing cross section is about 44 to 50 feet. Construction of an additional roadway width would require removal of a number of adjacent trees and the relocation of existing sidewalks. The 1990 Comprehensive Plan also recommended this project in light of the capacity deficiency identified on this roadway. Restripe Stolley Park Road between Webb Road and Locust Street: As shown in the appendix, this proposal would involve striping Stolley Park Road between Webb Road and Locust Street from 2 lanes to 3. Stolley Park Road between Webb Road and Locust Street has a typical capacity between 8,400 and 10,900 vpd and carries about 10,000 vpd. Widening this roadway would help alleviate some of the congestion associated with this roadway in the present and in the future. It is forecasted to carry about 12,000-13,000 vpd between Webb Road and Locust Street in 2020 in the absence of any improvements. This results in a V/C ratio between 1.0 and 1.4. Widening Stolley Park Road from 2 to 3 lanes (to provide a capacity approximately 12,500 vpd) from Webb Road to Locust Street would draw an additional 1500-3000 vpd on Stolley Park Road, on the average, and a reduction in V/C ratios to between 1.0 and 1.2. This project was also recommended in the 1990 Comprehensive Plan to alleviate the capacity deficiencies identified on this roadway. Extend Faidley to North Road: This project involves the extension of Faidley to North Road. This roadway would serve as an east/west collector and would likely carry 2,000 vpd in 2020. This project was not incorporated in the 1990 Comprehensive Plan. Widen Husker Highway between Route 30 and Stuhr Road: This project involves the widening of Husker Highway from 2 to 4 lanes between US Highway 30 and Stuhr Road. Husker Highway currently has a capacity on the order of 9,000-13,700 vpd. Husker Highway currently carries the following traffic volumes: x 1,500 vpd west of Grand Island between US Highway 30 and US Highway 281 x 5,000 vpd south of Grand Island between US Highway 281 and Locust Street x 4,000 vpd east of Grand Island between Locust Street and Stuhr Road Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 279 / 318 County:City:Village: 2012 2032 Thickness:Width: X Grading X Concrete X Right of Way X Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments Armor Coat X Drainage Structures Fencing Asphalt X Erosion Control Sidewalk Length: Length: Span:Rise:Length: Length: *County:*City:*State:*Federal:*Other:*Total: Signature:Title:Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- & Six- Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project GRAND ISLAND Design Standard Number:Surfacing Municipal Location Description: US Hwy 34 from US Hwy 281 to South Locust St Project Description: Nebraska Department of Roads Project No. STP-34-4 (126). Concrete repair, add turn lanes at Blaine Street, and bridge repair. Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Concrete Average Daily Traffic:Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Major Arterial PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT New Bridge:Roadway Width:Type: Bridge to Remain in Place:Roadway Width:Type: Box Culvert Type: Culvert Diameter:Type: Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)124 3,882 Bridges and Culverts Sized X YES N/A Street Superintendent 4,006*OPTIONAL Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)Project No.: 2.0 M-310(411) Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 280 / 318 NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF ROADS NOTICE OF HIGHWAY PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING Thursday, January 5, 2011; 4:00 – 6:00 PM Information Open House Public Meeting Central Community College, 3134 W. US Highway 34, Grand island, NE STPD-34-4(126), US-281 to Locust St., Grand Island; CN 41994 The Nebraska Department of Roads (NDOR) will hold a public information open house regarding the refurbishment of U. S. Highway 34 (US-34) from the intersection of U. S. Highway 281 (US-281) to South Locust Street, in Grand Island. The meeting will be held at Central Community College in Grand Island, Thursday, January 5, 2012, 4:00-6:00 P.M. Identified as STPD-34-4 (126), US-281 to Locust St., Grand Island, C.N. 41994, the proposed project would be constructed entirely within Hall County, Nebraska, mostly within the city limits of Grand Island. This proposed project would resurface the existing two-lane asphalt roadway and shoulders, including refurbishment of two bridge structures. The project consists of concrete repair as needed, plus milling and overlaying the existing US-34 roadway and surfaced shoulders with new asphalt. At the Blaine Street intersection, US-34 would be widened to add left-turn lanes. A short raised island on the north leg of Blaine Street would be added to better direct southbound traffic as it approaches the intersection. New roadway lighting will be provided at the intersection. Just east of Wortman Drive, the Union Pacific Railroad crossing approaches would be improved. The Wood River Bridge, between Garland and Blaine Streets, would be widened from 30-feet to 44-feet and refurbishments include a new roadway overlay, new approach sections, and new guardrails installed. The Wood River overflow bridge, just west of Blaine St., would be removed and replaced with a concrete box culvert. Two existing culverts east of Blaine would also be extended. The proposed construction is scheduled to commence in the summer of 2012 and take approximately five months. The construction will require the project to be built with detouring of US-34 traffic, using Interstate 80 (I-80) and South Locust Street. US-34 in Grand Island will be open to local traffic except during construction of the bridge, box culvert and widening for the left-turn lanes at Blaine Street. It is estimated US-34 would be closed to local traffic between Blaine Street and Catfish Avenue for three weeks and between Garland Street and Blaine Street for three months. The remainder of the project will be constructed “under traffic” with appropriate traffic control. Detour maps and information will be available at the meeting. Acquisition of a total of 0.16 acres of new right-of- way (ROW) will be required for this project from three tracts located adjacent to US-34 at the Blaine Street intersection; negotiations are in progress. The existing Control of Access along US-34 at the Blaine Street intersection will be perpetuated. Wetlands have been delineated along portions of this project. There will be minimal impacts resulting from construction activities, however no wetland mitigation will be required. The public meeting is being held to provide information and receive input regarding this project. All citizens are invited to attend and present relevant comments and questions. Design information will be displayed and personnel from NDOR will be present to answer questions and receive comments. The information “open house” format allows the public to come, gather pertinent information about the project, speak one-on-one with project personnel, and leave as they wish. All materials will be presented in both English and Spanish. A translator will be present. ____________________________________ NDOR will make every reasonable accommodation to provide an accessible meeting facility for all persons. Appropriate provisions for the hearing and visually challenged or persons with limited English proficiency (LEP) will be made if the Department is notified by December 22, 2011. Notification should be submitted to: Greg Weinert, Public Hearings Officer, Nebraska Department of Roads, P.O. Box 94759, Lincoln, NE 68509-4759; greg.weinert@nebraska.gov; voice telephone (402) 479-4871, TDD telephone (402) 479-3834, Fax (402) 479-3989. Information regarding the proposed project will be available after the meeting on the NDOR website at www.transportation.nebraska.gov/projects/ by clicking on the “US-34 GI” link. For further information, contact Don Turek, NDOR Roadway Design, (402) 479-4441, don.turek@nebraska.gov; or Wes Wahlgren, NDOR District Four Engineer, (308) 385-6265, wes.wahlgren@nebraska.gov. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 281 / 318 NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF ROADS Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 282 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Logan St from 2nd St to 1st St; Harrison St from 1st to Division St; Broadwell Ave from 2nd St to Division St; Monroe St. from Division St to Koenig St Madison St from 2nd St to Division St; 1st St from Logan St to Harrison St; & Division St from Harrison St to Madison St Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Concrete and/or concrete with bituminous overlay, storm sewer Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = , 2031 = Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Urban Minor Aterial/Local Roads PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Municipal Surfacing Thickness: Width: Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Underground storm drainage pipe construction, PCC pavement removal & replacement, landscaping and seeding. Federal Aid Project ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 542 953 1,495 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 0.7 Mile Project No.: M-310(508) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 283 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 284 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: 2012 Program will be for the construction of "quite zones" along the UPRR Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Varies from concrete, asphalt and brick depending on location. Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = 2,500, 2031 = 5,000 Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Urban Minor Arterial/Local Roads PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Surfacing Thickness: Width: Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Specific locations for quite zones in 2009 are the Walnut, Elm, Pine and Oak Street crossings with the UPRR ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 107 140 247 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) N/A Project No.: M-310(515) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 285 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Capital Avenue from Broadwell Avenue to Sky Park Rd Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphalt Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = 8,616, 2031 = 12,500 Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Other Arterial PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Municipal Surfacing Thickness: 8" Width: 24' Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Widen to three-lane section add pipe to connect existing culverts. ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 1,500 1,500 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 2.0 Miles Project No.: M-310(520) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 286 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Custer Avenue and 15th Street Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Concrete Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = 6,000, 2031 = 12,000 Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Urban Collector PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Municipal Surfacing Thickness: Width: Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: New Traffic Signal installation Federal Aid Project No. STRS-40(57) ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 67 317 384 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 300 Feet Project No.: M-310(537) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 287 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Highway 30 - Grant St to Claude Rd Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Concrete Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = , 2031 = Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) N/A PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Surfacing Thickness: Width: Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Full-depth concrete repair and diamond grinding. This is a NDOR project with city financial contributions. ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 572 572 1,144 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 1.6 Project No.: M-310(578) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 288 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Various Locations - Resurfacing 1.Blaine St from Garland to Stolley Park; 2. Blaine St from Stolley Park to crossing with Bike Trail; 3. 1st St trom Walnut to Sycamore; 4. North Road from 13th to State; 5. Independence Ave from Captial to Hwy 2; 6. Broadwell Ave from Anna to 2nd ; & 7. Broadwell Ave from 2nd to State Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphaltic Concrete Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = , 2031 = Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Various PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Municipal Surfacing Thickness: Width: Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Asphalt resurfacing for various federal aid routes within the City. Received Relaxation of Standards for shoulder width from the NBCS at October 19, 2012 meeting. ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 683 2,730 3,413 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) UNK Project No.: M-310(579) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 289 / 318 Stuhr Rd S13th St WNorth Rd NLocust St SWebb Rd NBlaine St SCapital Ave W Diers Ave NState St W St Paul RdEngleman Rd N3 rd S t WBroadwell Ave NAirport Rd E Oak St NCapital Ave E Airport Rd W 4 th S t E North Rd SUS Highway 281 SCuster Ave NA n n a S t W U S H ig hw ay 30 W J o h n S t W Sky Park Rd1 s t S t W El m St NK o e n ig S t W L o u is e S t WEd d y St NOld Potash Hwy W Webb Rd S7 th S t E Pi ne St ND iv is io n S t W 7 t h S t W Husker Hwy C h a rle s S t W O ld H igh w a y 30 W 9 th S t W Faidley Ave W Syc amo r e St N6 th S t W North Front St W 8 th S t W Wal nut St NVi ne St NAdams St SWheel er Ave NCl ar k St N4th St W 5th St W Bismark Rd E College St Park Ave N2 n d S t W US Highway 34 W Ch e rr y St SNebraska Highway 2 W Redwood RdForrest St Old Highway 2 W Cottage St Huston Ave NIndependence AveVine St SAr t h u r St SCl ar k St SClaude Rd5 t h S t E Oak St SKi mb all Ave NUS Highway 281 N US Highway 34 E Stolley Park Rd W Stagecoach Rd James RdKennedy DrEngleman Rd SBeal St Allen DrPioneer BlvdLariat Ln U S Hi g h way 3 0 E Bass Rd Stolley Park Rd EHancock AveMidaro Dr Fonner Park Rd EElm St SWhite AveSylvan StGrand Island Ave N11th St W 1 0 th S t WNorthwest AveMansfield RdGr ant St SStauss Rd Blake St Geddes StLafayette Ave NHarrison St SPark Dr August St STalc DrRiverside DrSouth St W Mason Ave S o u th F ro n t S t W Til den St SChurch Rd Dodge St W e s tg a te R d 1 s t S t E Manchester Rd Macron StTrust St Gold RdEddy St SJay StRainbow RdJan StApache RdHagge Ave 2 n d S t E Hall St K e n t A ve 3 r d S t E Farmstead RdCe d ar St N20th St E South St E Ada StShanna St Howard Ave N12th St E 14th St E Taft Av eRoush Ln Li ncol n Av e SPonderosa DrLillie Dr Cannon Rd Arapahoe AveSchroeder Ave8 t h S t EIdaho AveCarleton AveSagewood AveDriftwood Dr Wort man DrCraig Dr Brentwood BlvdPiper StKay Ave Edna Dr Riverview DrGeorge St Sandalwood Dr Oriole St 17th St W India nhe ad D rDel Mar AveCherokee Ave NLamar Ave Pine St S11th St E Graham AveMary Ln Kimball Ave SEbony Ln18th St E Spur Ln Cottonwood RdBl ai ne St NAllen Ave Ruby AveSycamore St SEwoldt Rd Roth Rd Ramada RdArrowhead RdY u n d S tMeadow RdA r c h A v e Kruse AveBellwood DrReed Rd I ngall s StO Flannagan StGateway AveWaugh St W West LnReuting Rd Plum St SBrahma StFrontage Rd Lake St 2 1 s t S t E Norwood Dr Angel LnSunset Ave EWillow StSandra Rd Old Lincoln Hwy W Garland StFonner Park Rd W Cochin StSt Patrick AveHampton Rd Madi son St NMemorial Park RdOrleans DrKaufman AveIndianhead Rd Holland DrNordic Rd Marian Rd Elmwood Dr Capital Trailer CtLee StreetFreedom DrWicklow Dr18th St W Enterprise Ave Cl ebur n St NIndian Grass Rd Johnson DrS o u th F ro n t S t E Commanche AveSothman DrOxnard Ave Eilenstine Rd ERoberts St E Phoenix Ave EAspen CirNorseman Ave Windridge AveOverland DrWilliam St2 3 r d S t W Oklahoma Ave EUPRR Dri v eAster Dr Lakeview CirChant ill y St Greenwood Dr Augusta Parkway Doreen StMabel DrIsland Cir Vi a Tri voli Catfish AveLaura AveWeis DrHillside DrArt h ur St N1 s t S t W Engleman Rd SUS Highway 281 NHusker Hwy Hall St Hall St North Rd SAda St5 th S t W Norseman AveIdaho AveUS Highway 281 SSunset Ave E 4 t h S t W 10th St W 6th St WUS Highway 281 NStolley Park Rd W 11 t h S t W PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FEDERAL AID PROJECTS BLAINE ST. - Garland to Stolley Park Rd BLAINE ST. - Stolley Park Rd to Bike Trail 1st ST - Walnut to Sycamore NORTH ROAD - 13th to State INDEPENDENCE AVE. - Capital Ave to Neb. Hwy #2 BROADWELL AVE. - 2nd to State BROADWELL AVE. - Anna to 2nd £ PLOT 01-25-2011-----FED- Aid-Overlay-2013.mxd Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 290 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 291 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 292 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 293 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 294 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 295 / 318 Grand IslandCouncil Session - 3/12/2013Page 296 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: US Highway 30 - Wood River to Grand Island Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphalt (3R Project) Average Daily Traffic: 2010 = 5300, 2030 = UNK Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Major Arterial PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: 001.03 Surfacing Thickness: Width: Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: US Highway 30 resurfacing, NDOR Project with City financial contribution. NDOR Project No. STPD-30-4(149) ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 584 5,161 5,745 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 12.2 Mile Project No.: M-310(581) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 297 / 318 County:City:Village: 2012 1,326 2032 2,000 Thickness:Width: 8 IN.28 FT. X Grading X Concrete Rigt of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments Armor Coat X Drainage Structures Fencing Asphalt X Erosion Control Sidewalk Length: Length: Span:Rise:Length: Length: *County:*City:*State:*Federal:*Other:*Total: Signature:Title:Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- & Six- Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project GRAND ISLAND Design Standard Number:Surfacing Municipal Location Description: Blaine Street from Schimmer Dr. to Wildwood Dr. Project Description: Concrete paving for industrial development site partially funded through Community Block Development Grant and LB-840 Funds. Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Gravel Average Daily Traffic:Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Local PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT New Bridge:Roadway Width:Type: Bridge to Remain in Place:Roadway Width:Type: Box Culvert Type: Culvert Diameter:Type: Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Funding: 575,000 - LB840 and 382,000 - CDBG ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)243 957 Bridges and Culverts Sized YES N/A 1,200*OPTIONAL Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)Project No.: 1.0 MILE M-310(588) Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 298 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Broadwell Avenue from 45' South of BNSF Crossing (north of Hwy 2) to BNSF Crossing. Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphaltic Concrete, Dirst Shoulder Average Daily Traffic: 2008 = 5,135, 2028 = UNK Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Other Arterial PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Municipal Surfacing Thickness: 6" Width: 27' Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Shoulder Widening: 8' Concrete shoulder through the crossing, both sides of roadway. ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 52 52 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 100 Feet Project No.: M-310 (591) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 299 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Annual Asphalt Resurfacing Project - various areas throughout the City Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphalt - Maintenance Project Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = , 2031 = Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Various PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Maintenance Surfacing Thickness: Width: Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 603 750 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 1.3 Project No.: M-310(593) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 300 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Various locations throughout the City Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Concrete or Asphalt Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = , 2031 = Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) N/A PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Surfacing Thickness: Width: Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Install ADA compliant handicap sidewalk ramps in various areas of the City - this program follows the City's previous year asphalt resurfacing project ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 125 125 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) UNK Project No.: M-310(597) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 301 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Airport Rd & Sky Park Rd Intersection Improvements Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphalt Average Daily Traffic: 2011 = 1,550, 2031 = Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Local PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Municipal Surfacing Thickness: UNK Width: 24' Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Widen turning radii at intersection ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 45 45 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 600 Feet Project No.: M-310(598) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 302 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Sky Park Road Improvements - Airport Rd to Abbott Rd Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphalt Average Daily Traffic: 2008 = 1,550, 2031 = TBD Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Local PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Municipal Surfacing Thickness: 8" Width: 24' Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Widen roadway and add lighting to improve safety and accommodate higher traffic volume for increased Airport usage. ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 700 700 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) 1.0 Mile Project No.: M-310(599) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 303 / 318 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- and Six-Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project County: City: Grand Island Village: Location Description: Sky Park Road from Capital Avenue to Airport Road Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphalt Average Daily Traffic: 2008 = 1,280, 2031 = TBD Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Local PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Design Standard Number: Municipal Surfacing Thickness: 8" Width: 24' Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments .............................................................. Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing .............................................................. Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalks .............................................................. Bridge to Remain in Place Roadway Width: Length: Type: New Bridge Roadway Width: Length: Type: Box Culvert Span: Rise: Length: Type: Culvert Diameter: Length: Type: Bridges and Culverts Sized Yes N/A Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: Improve roadway for potential Truck Route. ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)  OPTIONAL  COUNTY  CITY  STATE  FEDERAL  OTHER TOTAL 800 800 Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure) UNK Project No.: M-310(609) Signature: Title: Street Superintendent Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 304 / 318 County:City:Village: 2013 2,420 2033 TBD Thickness:Width: 8"24' X Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments Armor Coat X Drainage Structures Fencing X Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalk Length: 40' Length: Span:Rise:Length: Length: *County:*City:*State:*Federal:*Other:*Total: Signature:Title:Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- & Six- Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project GRAND ISLAND Design Standard Number:Surfacing Municipal Location Description: Shady Bend Rd just north of Gregory Ave to Bismark Rd. Project Description: Resurfacing project to restore roadway to structually sound state and to accommodate increasing truck traffic. Minor bridge repair and box culvert repair as will be determined. Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphalt, bridge, box culvert, guardrail Average Daily Traffic:Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Other Arterial & Local PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT New Bridge:Roadway Width:Type: Bridge to Remain in Place:Roadway Width:Type: 40'Concrete Box Culvert Box Culvert Type: Culvert Diameter:Type: Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)250 Bridges and Culverts Sized YES N/A Street Superintendent 250*OPTIONAL Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)Project No.: 0.8 MILE M-310(622) Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 305 / 318 County:City:Village: 2012 2032 Thickness:Width: Grading Concrete Right of Way Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter Utility Adjustments Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing Asphalt Erosion Control Sidewalk Length: Length: Span:Rise:Length: Length: *County:*City:*State:*Federal:*Other:*Total: Signature:Title:Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Street Superintendent 6,019*OPTIONAL Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)Project No.: 9.6 (Total)M-310 (623) Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)1,166 4,853 Bridges and Culverts Sized YES N/A Box Culvert Type: Culvert Diameter:Type: Bridge to Remain in Place:Roadway Width:Type: New Bridge:Roadway Width:Type: Design Standard Number:Surfacing 3R on Municipal State Hwy Location Description: Hwy 281 from mile post 68.90 to Ref. Post 78.5; In GI City Limits from Viaduct over Old Hwy 30 to Airport Road (3.7 Miles) Project Description: Full Depth Concrete Repair and Resurfacing; NDOR Project No. NH-281(127) with City participation Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Concrete Average Daily Traffic:Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Major Arterial PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- & Six- Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project GRAND ISLAND Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 306 / 318 County:City:Village: 2008 5,010 2028 TBD Thickness:Width: X Grading X Concrete X Right of Way X Lighting Aggregate Curb & Gutter X Utility Adjustments X Shoulder Widen Armor Coat Drainage Structures Fencing Asphalt X Erosion Control Sidewalk Length: Length: Span:Rise:Length: Length: *County:*City:*State:*Federal:*Other:*Total: Signature:Title:Date: NBCS Form 7, Feb 07 Board of Public Roads Classifications and Standards Form 7 One- & Six- Year Plan Highway or Street Improvement Project GRAND ISLAND Design Standard Number:Surfacing Municipal Location Description: Stuhr Rd from just south of BNSF crossing to Bismark Rd Project Description: Concrete overlay with shoulder widening Existing Surface Type and Structures: (Such as dirt, gravel, asphalt, concrete, culvert, or bridge) Asphalt Average Daily Traffic:Classification Type: (As shown on Functional Classification Map) Other Arterial PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT New Bridge:Roadway Width:Type: Bridge to Remain in Place:Roadway Width:Type: Box Culvert Type: Culvert Diameter:Type: Hydraulic Analysis Pending Other Construction Features: ESTIMATED COST (in Thousands)160 Bridges and Culverts Sized YES N/A Street Superintendent 160*OPTIONAL Project Length: (Nearest Tenth, State Unit of Measure)Project No.: 0.4 Mile M-310(624) Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 307 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item I2 #2013-71 - Approving Boundaries for Downtown Business Improvement District 2013 Staff Contact: Marco Floreani Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 308 / 318 Council Agenda Memo From:Marco Floreani, Community Development Administrator Meeting:March 12, 2013 Subject:Approval of Downtown Business Improvement District 2013 Boundaries and Initial Board Item #’s:I-2 Presenter(s):Marco Floreani, Community Development Administrator Background Business Improvement District #8 is set to expire on September 30, 2013. In a letter to the Mayor and City Council dated February 12, 2013, business and property owners expressed an interest to form a new business improvement district with the same boundaries as BID #8. State statutes allow for the creation of business improvement districts and the expenditure of funds for improvement of public places or facilities within the district, including the acquisition, construction, maintenance, and operation of such improvements, creation and implementation of a plan for improving the general architectural design of public areas within the district, the development of any public activities and promotion of public events, including the management and promotion and advocacy of retail trade activities or other promotional activities, and employing or contracting for personnel for any improvement program under the act. Chapter 19 of State Statutes sets forth the regulations pertaining to the formation of a business improvement district. The Statutes (19-4021) provide for the appointment of a business improvement board consisting of property owners, residents, business operators, or users of space within the business area to be improved. Discussion A Business Improvement District for the downtown has been in place for approximately 25 years. Business Improvement District #8 is set to expire on September 30, 2013. A nine member volunteer board oversees the activities and the budget for the District. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 309 / 318 The general boundaries are outlined on the attached map. The proposed initial board for Downtown 2013 is comprised of individuals who are currently serving on the Downtown Business Improvement District Board and are Downtown property owners or are employees of Downtown property owners. The identification of boundaries and formation of an initial board are the first steps in the creation of the district. Approval is recommended. If approved, the board members will make a plan and City Council will ask the Regional Planning Commission for a recommendation. Once the Planning Commission makes a recommendation, City Council may adopt a resolution to establish the business improvement district. There will then be a period for the property owners in the district to protest the formation of the BID. City Council will then hold a public hearing to create the district. After the hearing Council may pass an ordinance to establish the district. Alternatives It appears that the Council has the following alternatives concerning the issue at hand. The Council may: 1.Move to approve 2.Refer the issue to a Committee 3.Postpone the issue to future date 4.Take no action on the issue Recommendation City Administration recommends that the Council approve boundaries for Downtown BID 2013 and that the following be confirmed as board members for this Business Improvement District area: Amos Anson Craig Hand Mark Stelk Dee Johnson Tom Ziller Kurt Haecker Eric Edwards Kris Jerke Dave Wetherilt Sample Motion Move to approve the recommendations as submitted. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 310 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 311 / 318 Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 312 / 318 R E S O L U T I O N 2013-71 WHEREAS, Downtown property owners have recommended that the City of Grand Island create a business improvement district with boundaries set out below; and WHEREAS, Section 19-4021, R.R.S. 1942, indicates that the boundaries of a business improvement district shall be declared by the city council prior to or at the same time as the appointment of the business improvement board; and WHEREAS, the outer boundaries of the potential Downtown Business Improvement District 2013 are described on the attached map, marked Exhibit “A”; and WHEREAS, it is suggested that a business improvement board be appointed to make recommendations to the city council for the potential establishment of a district and plans for improvements if any, for such district; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA, that the property set our within the above- identified boundaries be declared as future Downtown Business Improvement District 2013. Be it further resolved, that the following individuals be initially appointed to serve on the business improvement board: Amos Anson, Craig Hand, Mark Stelk, Dee Johnson, Tom Ziller, Kurt Haecker, Eric Edwards, Kris Jerke, and Dave Wetherilt. - - - Adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Island, Nebraska, March 12, 2013. ______________________________ Jay Vavricek, Mayor Attest: ___________________________________ RaNae Edwards, City Clerk Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 313 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item I3 #2013-72 - Approving Surplus Equipment for Disposal from the Wastewater Division of the Public Works Department Staff Contact: Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 314 / 318 Council Agenda Memo From:Marvin Strong, Wastewater Plant Engineer Meeting:March 12, 2013 Subject:Approving Surplus Equipment for Disposal from the Wastewater Division of the Public Works Department Item #’s:I-3 Presenter(s):Terry Brown, Interim Public Works Director Background The Wastewater Division of the Public Works Department has a surplus of equipment at the plant that is recommended for disposal. Discussion City staff has evaluated the daily operations and have deemed the following equipment surplus and no longer needed at the Wastewater Treatment Plant: 1995 4x4 Chevy 3500 pickup with 106,000 miles – 5.7L with automatic transmission, VIN #1GTHK34K8SE506255 1994 International truck with a compost mixer body with 10,700 hours – has a DT 466, automatic transmission and scales, VIN #1HTSHAAR4RH598518 1995 International truck with a compost mixer body with 10,800 hours – has a DT 466, automatic transmission and scales, VIN #1HTSHAAR1SH682513 1996 Ford 8000 dump truck with a 20 yard box with 534,000 miles – has 275 hp Cummins and 9 speed transmission, VIN #1FDZW82E5TVA24567 785 John Deere manure spreader, VIN #W00785X003290 1980 4640 John Deere tractor with duals and front weights, VIN #018319R .75 yard dump box for an easement machine It is recommended that this surplus equipment be disposed of at Wieck’s Auction on March 16, 2013. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 315 / 318 Alternatives It appears that the Council has the following alternatives concerning the issue at hand. The Council may: 1.Move to approve 2.Refer the issue to a Committee 3.Postpone the issue to future date 4.Take no action on the issue Recommendation City Administration recommends that the Council approve the disposal of the equipment deemed surplus at the Wastewater Treatment Plant at Wieck’s Auction on March 16, 2013. Sample Motion Move to approve the resolution. Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 316 / 318 Approved as to Form ¤ ___________ March 8, 2013 ¤ City Attorney R E S O L U T I O N 2013-72 WHEREAS, the Wastewater Division of the Public Works Department for the City of Grand Island has a surplus of equipment at the plant that is recommended for disposal; and WHEREAS, City staff has evaluated the daily operations and have deemed the following equipment surplus: 1995 4x4 Chevy 3500 pickup with 106,000 miles – 5.7L with automatic transmission, VIN #1GTHK34K8SE506255 1994 International truck with a compost mixer body with 10,700 hours – has a DT 466, automatic transmission and scales, VIN #1HTSHAAR4RH598518 1995 International truck with a compost mixer body with 10,800 hours – has a DT 466, automatic transmission and scales VIN #1HTSHAAR1SH682513 1996 Ford 8000 dump truck with a 20 yard box with 534,000 miles – has 275 hp Cummins and 9 speed transmission VIN #1FDZW82E5TVA24567 785 John Deere manure spreader, VIN #W00785X003290 1980 4640 John Deere tractor with duals and front weights, VIN #018319R .75 yard dump box for an easement machine; and WHEREAS, it is recommended that this surplus equipment be disposed of at Wieck’s Auction on March 16, 2013. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA, that the disposal of such equipment deemed surplus at the Wastewater Treatment Plant is approved for disposal on March 16, 2013 at Wieck’s Auction. - - - Adopted by the City Council of the City of Grand Island, Nebraska, March 12, 2013. _______________________________________ Jay Vavricek, Mayor Attest: _______________________________________ RaNae Edwards, City Clerk Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 317 / 318 City of Grand Island Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Council Session Item J1 Approving Payment of Claims for the Period of February 27, 2013 through March 12, 2013 The Claims for the period of February 27, 2013 through March 12, 2013 for a total amount of $4,809,800.90. A MOTION is in order. Staff Contact: Jaye Monter Grand Island Council Session - 3/12/2013 Page 318 / 318